2 All references to “section” are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Read more at: Tax Times blog
August 6, 2012
2 All references to “section” are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Read more at: Tax Times blog
August 6, 2012
Sean and Nadia Roberts of Tehachapi, California, were also ordered to pay $3.2 million in restitution and fines, the U.S. Justice Department said. He is 77 years old and she is 64.
The couple pleaded guilty in 2011 to filing a false income tax return. From 2004 to 2008, they failed to report interest income from millions held in offshore accounts, falsely deducted bank transfers and under-reported income, prosecutors said.
One other former UBS client, Richard Werdiger, has received a prison term that long, according to an Internal Revenue Service-maintained list of UBS cases. Other clients have received a combination of probation, home confinement and fines.
The Robertses had requested probation, and their lawyer Nina Marino on Monday called the prison sentence "a travesty of justice" because of their age, restitution and other factors.
The sentence is likely to discourage restitution in future cases and reflects the Justice Department's "rigid and barbaric approach to these matters," Marino said.
Prosecutors asked the court to impose a two-year prison sentence because, according to court papers, the couple took steps to keep their offshore holdings secret after the investigation into UBS became publicly known.
The tax returns in question covered both individual income and the couple's income from two corporations they ran, a pilot-testing school and an aircraft-maintenance company.
If you have a Swiss Bank Account, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
Read more at: Tax Times blog
August 6, 2012
Switzerland's Finance Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf says the US is 'constantly making new demands that we cannot accept', thus delaying resolution of their dispute over the prosecution of 11 Swiss banks.
For more information on this story go to Reuters
Read more at: Tax Times blog
August 6, 2012
The fallout extended to U.S. depositors at LGT who were investigated by the IRS. Since then the IRS has promoted several voluntary disclosure initiatives to attempt to convince U.S. persons who failed to file FBARs to settle up with the IRS. To date those programs have resulted in over 30,000 individuals making voluntary disclosures of the offshore bank accounts to the IRS. These programs have been accused by some tax lawyers as being too much stick, and not enough carrot.
U.S. owners of these offshore accounts have difficult choices to make in a short period of time. Should they enter the IRS' Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), before it's not too late? Should they appeal the turnover of information by LLB through the Lichtenstein court system? Should they wait and do nothing?
Each of these solutions has its own set of risks and rewards. Entering the OVDP will be expensive. Penalties of 27.5% of the offshore account balances can be expected. In addition, other non-financial assets may also be subject to the 27.5% penalty. In addition, back taxes must be paid, generally going back to 2004. On top of that expect additional penalties, and interest.
On the other hand not entering the OVDP can lead to FBAR penalties equaling 300% of the foreign bank account balances, as well as possible criminal tax evasion charges. The bottom line is that everyone's situation is different, and only consultation with a tax lawyer experienced in these offshore issues will begin to help in coming to the right personal decision.
Read more at: Tax Times blog