Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: April 2012

Final Regulations on Treatment of Gain With Stock in Foreign Corporations Issued by IRS

The Internal Revenue Service released final regulations (T.D. 9585) April 23 on the treatment of gain recognized with stock in certain foreign corporations upon distributions.

The new rules finalize proposed regulations (REG-147636-08) issued in February 2009 that cross referenced final and temporary regulations (T.D. 9444) involving tax code Sections 367(a) and 367(b) to certain transfers of stock to foreign corporations under Section 304.

The final regulations remove the temporary regulations and provide that gain recognized under Section 301(c)(3) on the receipt of a distribution of property from a foreign corporation with respect to its stock will be treated for purposes of Section 1248(a) as gain from the sale or exchange of the stock of such corporation.

A. Modified Application of Section 367(a) to Deemed Section 351 Exchanges

Consistent with the final 2006 regulations, the temporary regulations under section 367(a) generally provide that if, pursuant to section 304(a)(1), a United States person is treated as transferring stock of a domestic or foreign corporation to a foreign corporation in exchange for stock of such foreign corporation in a deemed section 351 exchange, the deemed section 351 exchange is not a transfer to a foreign corporation subject to section 367(a). However, if the distribution received by the United States person in redemption of the foreign acquiring corporation stock received in the deemed section 351 exchange is subject to section 301 (by reason of section 302(d)), the temporary regulations provide an exception to the general rule if the distribution is applied against and reduces (in whole or in part), pursuant to section 301(c)(2), the basis of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by the United States person other than the stock deemed issued to the United States person in the deemed section 351 exchange. In such a case, the United States person shall recognize gain under section 367(a)(1) equal to the amount by which the gain realized by the United States person with respect to the transferred stock in the deemed section 351 exchange exceeds the amount of the distribution received by the United States person in redemption of the foreign acquiring corporation stock that is treated as a dividend under section 301(c)(1) and included in gross income by the United States person. Thus, in the hypothetical transaction described above, if any amount of the distribution received by P in redemption of the F2 stock was applied against the basis of the F2 stock held by P before (and after) the transaction, then under the temporary regulations P would recognize $100x gain under section 367(a)(1) in connection with its transfer of the F1 stock to F2 in the deemed section 351 exchange.

The exceptions to the application of section 367(a)(1) for transfers of stock provided in §1.367(a)-3 are not available to transfers covered by the temporary regulations. For example, a United States person cannot avoid gain recognition under the temporary regulations by entering into a gain recognition agreement under §§1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(ii) and 1.367(a)-8 with respect to the deemed section 351 exchange.

The temporary regulations provide rules to coordinate the recognition of gain under the temporary regulations and the corresponding increase to the basis of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation received by the United States person in the transaction. Under such rules the increase to the basis of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation by reason of gain recognized by the United States person under the temporary regulations would be taken into account before determining the consequences of the redemption of the shares of the foreign acquiring corporation. For example, in the hypothetical transaction described above, the basis of the F2 stock deemed received by P in exchange for the F1 stock would be increased to $100x under section 358 before determining the consequences of the redemption of such stock under section 301. The gain recognized by P will be treated as recognized with respect to the F1 stock transferred in the deemed section 351 exchange in proportion to the gain realized with respect to the F1 stock.

B. Modified Application of Section 367(b) to Deemed Section 351 Exchanges

The temporary regulations make similar revisions to the final 2006 regulations under section 367(b). Specifically, the temporary regulations provide that §1.367(b)-4(b) shall apply to a deemed section 351 exchange to the extent the distribution received by the exchanging shareholder in redemption of the stock deemed issued by the foreign acquiring corporation is applied against and reduces, pursuant to section 301(c)(2), the adjusted basis of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by the exchanging shareholder before the transaction.
The temporary regulations provide rules to determine the amount of an income inclusion that is attributable to the shares of stock of the foreign acquired corporation transferred in the deemed section 351 exchange when the income inclusion required under the regulations is less than the aggregate section 1248 amount attributable to all of the shares of stock transferred in the deemed section 351 exchange.

C. Treatment of Gain Recognized under Section 301(c)(3) for Purposes of Section 1248(a)

The temporary regulations under section 1248(a) provide that gain recognized under section 301(c)(3) on the receipt of a distribution of property from a foreign corporation shall be treated, for purposes of section 1248(a), as gain from the sale or exchange of the stock of such corporation. The temporary regulations preserve the policies underlying section 367(b), are consistent with the premise of the final 2006 regulations, and ensure that the earnings and profits of lower-tier foreign subsidiaries described in section 1248(c)(2) are taken into account.

D. Effective Dates

The temporary regulations apply to transfers or distributions occurring on or after February 10, 2009.

The final regulations (T.D. 9585) publish April 24 in the Federal Register.

Text of T.D. 9585 is at http://www.irs.gov/irb/2009-09_IRB/ar06.html.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Barnesandnoble.com Owes New Mexico $534,000 in Sales Taxes


A nationally known online bookseller must pay more than a half million dollars in taxes for books, music and movies bought by customers in New Mexico, the state Court of Appeals has ruled in a dispute over the state's power to tax corporate chains and Internet shopping.

The court's decision came Wednesday in a case involving an out-of-state online business, Barnes&nobles.com, LLC, which was part of the corporate family of bookseller Barnes & Noble Inc.

The online retailer was assessed gross receipts taxes in 2006 of $534,563 for sales from 1998 to 2005. The company protested and a state agency hearing officer agreed with the company that it wasn't required to collect and pay the tax because it had no presence in the state or what is known as a "substantial nexus" with New Mexico.
The online retailer was organized under Delaware laws and it had no employees or offices in the state. However, a separate Barnes and Noble company operates three bookstores in New Mexico, with the first of those started in Albuquerque in 1996 and the most recent in Las Cruces in 2003.

Traditionally, online retailers have been required to collect taxes on sales to customers in New Mexico if the company has a physical store, a warehouse or other facilities in the state.
The Department of Taxation and Revenue contended that activities at the in-state stores, including gift cards that could be redeemed online and a membership plan that offered online discounts, created the necessary connection to New Mexico to require the Internet retailer to collect and pay the state's tax. Books purchased online also could be returned for credit at the Barnes & Noble stores in New Mexico.

The Court of Appeals said those activities alone weren't enough to justify taxing the online sales, but it concluded the "in-state use of the Barnes & Noble's trademarks was sufficient to meet the constitutional standard" to permit the New Mexico tax.
Because the trademarks were licensed to the online retailer and the company with in-state stores, Barnes & Noble "was in effect telling customers to consider taxpayers (the online retailer) and booksellers to be one and the same," the court said.

"The goodwill developed both directly, by in-store activities promoting taxpayer's website, and indirectly, by consumers' increased awareness of Barnes & Noble due to the presence of in-state stores, helped to establish and maintain a market in New Mexico for taxpayer," the court said.
Attorneys for Barnes & Noble did not immediately return telephone and email messages on Thursday seeking comment on the court ruling and whether their client plans to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court.

Text of the opinion is available at http://op.bna.com/dt.nsf/r?Open=vmar-8tjtkm.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Foreign accounts in Miami to be disclosed….

Tax rule would force banks to disclose identities of foreigners who make US deposits.

 
Over the objections of Florida lawmakers, the U.S. Treasury Department has issued a new rule that will force banks to disclose the identity of foreigners who deposit their money in America.
The regulation - which represents a major shift in policy - goes into effect next January and has alarmed the entire Florida congressional delegation, which is concerned the requirement will prompt foreigners to move their money to countries that require less disclosure.

"This is going to have a devastating impact on Florida and Florida banks," said U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who has filed legislation, along with U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., to block the rule.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Large Taxpayers still on IRS Radar Near-Term.

The Internal Revenue Service will continue to have a presence with the nation's largest taxpayers despite its plans for a gradual move away from a model where examination coverage is often determined by a taxpayer's size, IRS Large Business & International Commissioner Heather Maloy said April 18.

Her comments came while discussing the vision for a new audit process that eventually may shift some resources away from Coordinated Industry Case (CIC) taxpayers, first unveiled by IRS Deputy Commissioner for Service and Enforcement Steven Miller at the end of March.

“We will always have some type of presence among companies with the highest assets and the highest income. We are going to have to ensure the compliance of this population,” Maloy said on a webcast sponsored by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Washington, D.C.

In response to questions from Kevin Brown, a principal in PwC's tax controversy and dispute resolution practice, she said, “I don't think CIC taxpayers should expect in the near term that there won't be any type of IRS presence.”

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help