The Internal Revenue Service announced on May 16, 2019 a key advancement in how it identifies its biggest and most complex large corporations. The IRS's Large Business and International Division (LB&I) began a new application of data analytics for determining the population of its largest and most complex corporate taxpayers. This new Large Corporate Compliance (LCC) program replaces the Coordinated Industry Case (CIC) program and covers compliance oversight for LB&I’s largest corporate taxpayers. LCC is one of LB&I’s portfolio of compliance programs.

LCC employs automatic application of the large case pointing criteria to determine the LCC population. For example, pointing criteria include such items as gross assets and gross receipts.  In the past, this was done on a manual, localized basis. Automated pointing allows a more objective determination of the taxpayers that should be part of the population.

The LCC program further improves LB&I's ability to efficiently focus its resources on noncompliance.

LCC works in tandem with LB&I agents and examiners who apply their experience and expertise in undertaking compliance actions and determining compliance treatment streams of the biggest and most-complex corporate taxpayers. Each enhances the other.

The program includes continuous improvement using an agile model principle to continually monitor and improve based on feedback from stakeholders including field teams, practice networks, and data scientists.

  
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini& Associates, P.A. 

 

 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:

www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com or

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

According to Law360, a deceased Tennessee man’s estate was liable for $1.3 million in taxes owed by his defunct bowling company since asset transfers to another company were fraudulent, the Sixth Circuit said in a Wednesday affirmation of a U.S. Tax Court decision.

Billy F. Hawk Jr.'s estate is liable for the taxes because Holiday Bowl Inc.’s 2003 sale of assets, bowling alleys, to MidCoast International Inc. was a sham transaction under Internal Revenue Code Section 6901(a) and the Tennessee Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Circuit Judge Jeffrey Stuart Sutton said in the published opinion.

The taxes associated with the one-time bowling company were never paid, and it eventually dissolved in 2006, according to the opinion. The Internal Revenue Service examined MidCoast and uncovered not only the Holiday Bowl sale but at least 60 other similar transactions, according to the opinion.

MidCoast, Sequoia Capital LLC, which had originally given money to MidCoast to fund the purported purchase — and a law firm were investigated, Judge Sutton said. As a result, the government launched a civil collection against the Hawks, according to the opinion.

The Tax Court was correct to conclude that Sequoia’s loan to MidCoast was a fake transaction and that Holiday Bowl had merely distributed cash to the Hawks, who were liable for taxes as fraudulent transferees of Holiday Bowl, Judge Sutton said.

MidCoast had received loans from Sequoia, but those loans were issued and repaid on the same day as the MidCoast transaction, according to a November 2017 Tax Court opinion. The stock redemption and the MidCoast transaction failed to hold up under Tennessee’s adoption of the Tennessee Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, or TUFTA. Rather, they were part of the same event: a distribution of assets in complete liquidation, according to the order.

The dispute focused on certain transactions made in 2003 related to Holiday Bowl after Hawk died, when the estate sold its shares in the company, which was characterized as a stock sale, to MidCoast Investment Inc. for about $3.4 million, which immediately resold the stock to another third party. However, Holiday Bowl had no operating assets or employees, just cash and tax liabilities, according to court documents.

Nancy Hawk, widow of Billy F. Hawk and co-executor of the estate along with Regions Bank, had argued in August that TUFTA was incorrectly applied in the Tax Court decision. The court was wrong to deem that a loan used to purchase the Holiday Bowl shares was a sham, it incorrectly found that the company was insolvent, and there was no evidence that tax advisers who evaluated the transactions should have suspected tax avoidance, they said.

The U.S. urged the appeals court in November to affirm the Tax Court's decision finding the estate liable for the $1.3 million, saying that under both Section 6901(a) and TUFTA, the estate was transferees. Tennessee law allowed the government to reject Holiday Bowl's original description of a stock sale with MidCoast International Inc., and the Internal Revenue Service could recharacterize the stock sale under the substance-over-form doctrine, according to the U.S.

Have a US Estate Tax Problem?

Robert S. Blumenfeld  - 

“Insufficient IRS funding creates incentives for some taxpayers to take aggressive tax positions,” he said.

 

 

“Well-advised taxpayers, including multinational companies and high-income taxpayers, have the incentives and the resources to do just that.”  
While high-income taxpayers have the most opportunity to engage in tax avoidance planning, the IRS isn’t focusing its audits on them. “Instead, in 2017, the IRS targeted low-income, Earned Income Tax Credit taxpayers,” said Neal. “Many question why the IRS is using its limited resources in this manner rather than deploying them on high-income taxpayers and corporations where the return is greater per hour of a revenue agent’s time.

Taxpayers are more compliant when they may be audited. 

 But the overall audit rate has plummeted below .005. 

• IRS examination personnel have decreased by nearly 5,000 employees or 38 percent over seven years, and
• IRS revenue officers have decreased by over 1,600 employees or 42 percent during the same period.  

This All May Well Be an Academic Exercise,

As Any Bill Has Almost No Chance of Passing a

Republican-Controlled Senate, Let Alone a Republican President, Who Has Been under Audit Every Year.

 

 

J. Russell George, inspector general at TIGTA, presented a report on the tax gap and taxpayer noncompliance and pointed to some of TIGTA’s earlier reports on taxing the gig economy. In a report evaluating the gig economy’s impact on self-employment tax compliance, TIGTA reported that cases with billions of dollars in potential tax discrepancies involving taxpayers who earn income in the gig economy are not being worked by the IRS,” he said.

 

“Many cases were not selected to be worked by the IRS due to the large volume of discrepancies that were identified

and resource constraints.

 

 

In addition, a lack of an overall gig economy compliance strategy led IRS employees to remove thousands of cases from inventory without justification or with justifications

that were inaccurate.”

 

James R. McTigue, Jr., director of strategic issues at the Government Accountability Office, also presented a report by the GAO on how multiple strategies are needed to address taxpayer noncompliance. “GAO’s work has demonstrated that no single approach will fully and cost effectively address noncompliance since the problem has multiple causes and spans different types of taxes and taxpayers,” said the report. For example, expanding third-party information reporting could increase voluntary compliance and providing IRS with the authority to regulate paid tax return preparers could improve the accuracy of the tax returns they prepare.”  

 

Need an Reliable Tax Planning?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini& Associates, P.A.  
 

 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:

www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com 

or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243 





 

 

 
Sources
 
Rep Tom Suozzi
 
TaxProToday