Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: April 2012

APAs – IRS 2011 Annual Report Shows Applications & Completions Down.

The IRS completed 43 advance pricing agreements in 2011, down from a total of 69 in 2010, while the number of pending requests increased from 350 in 2010 to 445 in 2011, according to the IRS's annual statutory report on APAs released April 2.

In Announcement 2012-13, IRS attributed the decline in case closures to the amount of staff time directed toward creating the new Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement (APMA) Program, a merger of the former APA Program with the portion of the Office of U.S. Competent Authority that resolves transfer pricing cases under U.S. treaty mutual agreement procedures.

Acting APMA Director John Hinding, meanwhile, said the slow processing times also may have contributed to the decline in submissions, which in 2011 dropped to 96 from an all-time high of 144 in 2010.

In addition, the decline of APA personnel during 2011, and the record number of new APA applications filed in the past four years, contributed to the slowdown in processing cases. The average time to complete an APA increased from 37.2 months in 2010 to 40.7 months in 2011, according to the report.

As of Jan. 25, 2012, for the resolution of transfer pricing cases, U.S. Competent Authority employed seven managers, 57 analysts, five economists, and five support staff. These personnel, combined with the APA personnel, form the APMA program.

The APMA also will handle negotiations for transfer pricing and other allocation adjustments arising out of domestic and foreign audits—so-called double tax cases.

“These cases were previously handled, along with APA negotiations with treaty partners, by Competent Authority,” he explained. “So the staff will be employed both for APA and double tax work.”

The growing backlog of cases may have contributed to the decline in submissions in 2011.

Further, the program has become aggressive about including additional years in completed APAs. Because it takes several years to process an APA application, the term of the initial request in many cases is nearly expired by the time the application is approved.

The remedy has been to automatically add additional years to the term, thus negating the need for taxpayers to file for renewal almost immediately.

The impact of the APMA reorganization might not be seen in 2012, but certainly by 2013 you'll see a big difference.

According to the report, APMA expects APA applications to rebound in 2012, possibly reaching the same high levels as in 2008-2010.

In addition, the report noted that:
 
• of the 96 APA applications filed in 2011, 20 were unilateral and 76 were bilateral;
• the 43 APAs completed included 15 renewals and one revised or amended APA;
• the 445 pending requests include 258 requests for new APAs and 187 requests for renewals;
• two APAs were canceled or revoked; and
• nine APA applications were withdrawn.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Owe The IRS? Get ready to have your Passport Suspended.

LOS ANGELES (CBS)— A bill authored by a Senator Barbara Boxer that could potentially allow the federal government to prevent any Americans who owe back taxes from traveling outside the U.S. is one step closer to becoming law.

Senate Bill 1813 was introduced back in November by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Los Angeles) to “reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes” . 

In addition to authorizing appropriations for federal transportation and infrastructure programs, the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act” or “MAP-21″ includes a provision that would allow for the “revocation or denial” of a passport for anyone with “certain unpaid taxes” or “tax delinquencies”.

Section 40304 of the legislation states that any individual who owes more than $50,000 to the Internal Revenue Service may be subject to “action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport”.

There does not appear to be any specific language requiring a taxpayer to be charged with tax evasion or any other crime in order to have their passport revoked or limited — only that a notice of lien or levy has been filed by the IRS.

Boxer vowed last week to push House Republicans to pass the bipartisan transportation bill that would keep the Highway Trust Fund from going bankrupt.

“Thousands of businesses are at stake, and eventually we are talking about nearly three million jobs at stake,” she said in a statement. “There are many people on both sides of the aisle in the Senate who want to get our bill, MAP-21, passed into law, and I am going to do everything I can to keep the pressure on the Republican House to do just that.”

Read more at: Tax Times blog

UBS exec criticizes U.S. effort to get account data

A top UBS AG executive told a U.S. lawmakers that the Swiss bank regrets breaking U.S. tax laws, but criticized U.S. authorities' efforts to obtain information on thousands of bank accounts suspected of being used by American tax dodgers.

"We deeply regret our breaches of U.S. laws," UBS' Mark Branson told a Senate subcommittee hearing into a crackdown on offshore tax havens that has called into question Switzerland's cherished tradition of banking secrecy.

Branson called for a diplomatic resolution of U.S. government efforts to get information from UBS on as many as 52,000 undisclosed accounts sought in a civil lawsuit filed against the bank by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

"UBS believes the dispute should be resolved through diplomatic discussions" between the governments of Switzerland and the United States, Branson said, adding that the bank believes it has complied as much as possible with the lawsuit.

"The IRS is attempting to resolve this diplomatic dispute in a courtroom, which is neither productive, nor proper," he said.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

How to end tax fraud?

On March 28, the U.S. Justice Department sought to close a nationwide chain of income tax preparation shops it accuses of fraud. The action underscores the potential for abusive business practices that taxpayers face because Congress has failed to embrace technology that would eliminate most tax returns.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help