Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: May 2012

Foreign Banks refuse to handle accounts of Americans.

That's what some of the world's largest wealth-management firms are saying ahead of Washington's implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, known as Fatca, which seeks to prevent tax evasion by Americans with offshore accounts.
HSBC Holdings, Deutsche Bank, Bank of Singapore and DBS Group Holdings all say they have turned away business. "I don't open US accounts, period," said Su Shan Tan, head of private banking at Singapore-based DBS, Southeast Asia's largest lender, who described regulatory attitudes toward US clients as "Draconian."
The government needs to be tougher on offshore tax crimes than it has been, said US Representative Richard Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat and one of the original sponsors of the legislation. Fatca, introduced after Zurich-based UBS said in 2009 that it aided tax evasion by Americans and agreed to pay $780 million (Dh2,868 million) to avoid prosecution, is already helping to improve banking transparency, he said.
"Most of the hedge funds I know in Asia won't take American clients," said Faber.
Bank of Singapore, the private-banking arm of Oversea-Chinese Banking, ranked strongest in the world for the last two years by Bloomberg Markets magazine, has turned away millions of dollars from Americans because it doesn't want to deal with the regulatory hassle, according to Chief Executive Officer Renato de Guzman. The bank had $32 billion under management as of the beginning of the year.
At industry meetings he attends in Singapore, not accepting US clients is "quite a prevailing sentiment," de Guzman said. There are 18 private banks operating in Singapore, including units run by UBS, Credit Suisse Group, Deutsche Bank and HSBC, he said.
For more go to: Gulfnews.com

Read more at: Tax Times blog

It may be better to take a hit on FATCA?

The Association of Investment Companies (AIC) has suggested to members with modest investments in US securities that they may be better off not signing up to controversial tax initiative FATCA and taking the penalty charge.

FATCA, or the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, is a set of measures designed to fight offshore tax evasion by US citizens. It will be a significant cost and administrative burden for financial institutions and investment companies.

For companies which do not derive a significant proportion of their revenues from the US and have few US investors, the cost of complying outweighs the 30% withholding penalty, the AIC said.

The number of US shareholders with stakes in UK registered trusts is minimal, argues the AIC.

“If you are not invested in the US, or have minimal exposure, it might be better to take the modest hit from the 30% withholding tax as opposed to racking up much more substantial costs from all the administration in complying,” said Ian Sayers, director general at the AIC .

“For these trusts the impact would be too small, so it is not worth signing up.

“VCTs, for example, are predominately made up of UK retail money and UK investments, so they may not have to sign up and in fact will be better off not complying.”

FATCA timetable

Autumn 2012:IRS to publish final model FFI agreement.
January 2013: Entities can start signing IRS agreements.
January 2014: Start of withholding of US-source income to non-participating entities.
January 2015: Start of withholding of US-source gross proceeds to non-participating entities, also reporting of ‘passthru payments’ commences.
January 2017: Institutions required to withhold on their payments to other non-participating institutions.

For more go to IFALogo   

Read more at: Tax Times blog

10 Strategies Used by the Rich to Pay No Taxes!

If you have lots of money, Tuesday, April 17, was one of the best tax days since the early 1930s: Top tax rates on ordinary income, dividends, estates, and gifts remain at or near historically low levels. That’s thanks, in part, to legislation passed in December 2010 by the 111th Congress and signed by President Barack Obama. Starting next January, rates may be headed higher.

For the 400 U.S. taxpayers with the highest adjusted gross income, the effective federal income tax rate—what they actually pay—fell from almost 30 percent in 1995 to just over 18 percent in 2008, according to the Internal Revenue Service. And for the approximately 1.4 million people who make up the top 1 percent of taxpayers, the effective federal income tax rate dropped from 29 percent to 23 percent in 2008. It may seem too fantastic to be true, but the top 400 end up paying a lower rate than the next 1,399,600 or so.

That’s not just good luck. It’s often the result of hard work, as suggested by some of the strategies below. Much of the income among the top 400 derives from dividends and capital gains, generated by everything from appreciated real estate—yes, there is some left—to stocks and the sale of family businesses. As Warren Buffett likes to point out, since most of his income is from dividends, his tax rate is less than that of the people who clean his office.

For more go to Blumberg Business Week.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help