Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: September 2012

Troubled times for Swiss Bankers

The Swiss banking sector is keeping its head above water in increasingly choppy seas, but must pass a series of crucial tests to thrive in future, according to the industry’s lobby group.

The Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) identified rampant regulation, the global tax evasion row and barriers to key markets as the main challenges ahead.

Swiss banks suffered a 3.8 per cent drop in turnover last year to SFr59.4 billion ($62 billion), the SBA reported on Tuesday. Profits (SFr13 billion) and the number of employees (108,100) remained stable, but banks have shed a number of those jobs already this year.

But the still unresolved tax evasion dispute is hanging over the industry like a dark cloud and could hinder growth prospects once the global economy starts to improve.

Withholding tax deals with Austria and Britain are done and dusted, but political opponents in Germany, the most important partner, are threatening to torpedo the government’s agreement with Switzerland.

The latest dark twist to the tax evasion saga is taking place in the United States, where the authorities have pieced together enough information (from voluntary tax disclosures and the handover of Swiss banking data) to identify employees – leaving them open to potential prosecutions.

If you have Unreported Income From Swiss Banks, contact the Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Consultation at www.TaxAid.usor www.TaxLaw.msor Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Call US before Uncle Sam finds you!

Swissinfo

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Unwelcome fallout from HSBC Mexico affair for the CAYMAN ISLANDS

As Cayman faces a visit from the OECD in connection with its international obligations regarding tax transparency and anti-money laundering, Premier McKeeva Bush has raised his concerns about HSBC Mexico, which has a class B banking licence in Cayman, and the recent accusations of poor regulation on thousands of its Cayman Islands accounts found to have links to organized crime.

Speaking in the Legislative Assembly on Friday, Bush said his government was “extremely concerned” about the potential impact on Cayman. “The actions or lack thereof by the bank officials and alleged misuse of the Cayman entity can undermine the jurisdiction’s hard work and accomplishments in the AML regime,” Bush said.

CNS Business

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Florida Banks Explain 2013 IRS Reporting Rule For Foreigners

The new rule, which goes into effect Jan. 1, 2013, requires banks to report information to the Internal Revenue Service on non-taxable interest paid on accounts held by non-resident foreign nationals. It applies to accounts that earn more than $10 in interest in a year.

Potentially such information could be shared with the account holders’ home countries, raising privacy concerns among some international account holders. Some fear their home governments might make politically motivated requests for their bank information or that data indicating their wealth will leak out, bankers said.

And those jitters have prompted some depositors to move their money to jurisdictions such as Panama or the Cayman Islands that have stronger privacy laws, said David Schwartz, executive director of FIBA. Anecdotally, he said, FIBA has heard that several million dollars have left Florida for other jurisdictions since the new regulation was passed in April.

“The U.S. banking system is still the safest and soundest place in the world to put your money,’’ said Schwartz. “There is no reason to panic. There is a process by which the information is collected but not automatically exchanged with home countries.’’

It is the IRS that will make the determination on whether to release the information — and only as a part of a tax evasion investigation or something of that nature, said Vega. 

Rev. Proc. 2012-24,2012-20 I.R.B. 913,  published contemporaneously with the final regulations, provides a list of the countries whose residents will be subject to reporting under the final regulations. The revenue procedure specifically states that the listed countries are those with which the United States has in effect an income tax or other convention or bilateral agreement relating to the exchange of information pursuant to which the United States agrees to provide, as well as to receive, information, and under which the Competent Authority is the Secretary of Treasury or his delegate. 

Accordingly, bank deposit information reported pursuant to the final regulations will be exchanged only with foreign governments with which the United States has an agreement providing for the exchange of information and only when certain additional requirements are satisfied.
 
The IRS noted that, even when such an agreement exists, the IRS is not compelled to exchange information, including information collected pursuant to these regulations, if there is concern regarding the use of the information or other factors exist that would make exchange inappropriate. 

The revenue procedure also includes a second list identifying the countries with which the IRS has determined it is appropriate to have an automatic exchange relationship regarding interest subject to reporting under the final regulations. The IRS currently exchanges deposit interest information on an automatic basis with Canada.
 
Residents of countries not on the information sharing agreement list published in the revenue procedure are not subject to reporting under the final regulations. However, the IRS notes that banks can elect to report interest payments to all of their nonresident alien depositors as a way to address any potential burden associated with determining which depositors are subject to reporting. Thus, residents of non-sharing countries can become subject to reporting even though their country of residence is not listed in the revenue procedure.

According to Treasury and the IRS, the extension of the reporting requirement is considered appropriate because of the importance of cooperative information exchange for tax purposes. The information gathered, as a result of information exchange relationships with other jurisdictions, can be utilized by the United States to identify potential U.S. taxpayers that evade tax by hiding income and assets offshore.


If you have questions regarding this New Reporting Requirement, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREETax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Sources:

Miami Herald

Rev. Proc. 2012-24,2012-20 I.R.B. 913,

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

A $200,000 UBS Account Grew Into A $21 Million IRS Penalty


Another former holder of a secret UBS AG account got off with probation Tuesday, when federal sentencing guidelines suggested a sentence of six months to a year. But it’s hard to argue that 84-year-old Jules Robbins, a World War II vet who settled in Long Island and built a nice business (Webster Watch) importing and selling watches to the likes of Kmart and Family Dollar Stores, got off cheaply.

Here’s his intriguing tale, as pieced together from documents on file at the U.S. District Court for Southern New York. (Robbins’ lawyers declined further comment.) In 1967, Robbins made a $200,000 deposit into an account with UBS in Vaduz, Liechtenstein, in the name of a Swiss foundation. In 2000, he transferred the account’s balance into a different UBS account in the name of a sham Hong Kong corporation, Waldenburg Finance Ltd.

By the end of 2007, the $200,000, largely invested in U.S. stocks, had grown to $41.7 million, a 14% annual average compounded return and three points better than the S&P 500. In addition to apparently smart stock picking, the account benefitted from decades of tax evasion; during that period, Robbins never reported the account, or any of its capital gains or other earnings to the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Then came 2008, not a good year for Robbins. The market crashed, and the securities in his Swiss account “lost approximately half of their value” according to a pre-sentencing memo filed by his attorneys. Plus, the federal government was closing in on the names of U.S. customers with unreported accounts at UBS. Robbins hired lawyers, filed back FBARs, sent $1 million to the IRS and began putting together accurate amended returns for 2002 through 2007.


As part of his 2010 plea deal, Robbins agreed to pay a hefty FBAR penalty—$20.8 million, or 50% of that bull market 2007 balance of $41.6 million. That was more than was left in the account and Robbins was forced to tap assets outside his UBS account to pay the penalty. In their sentencing memo, Robbins’ lawyers said the penalty wiped out 78% of his net worth. By contrast, California real estate developer Igor Olenicoff paid just $52 million in back taxes, fines and civil fraud penalties for hiding more than $200 million off shore.

“Unlike a defendant with an undisclosed cash account, Mr. Robbins is paying a penalty on the basis of unrealized gains that have long since evaporated,’’ his attorneys noted in their sentencing memo.

If you have Unreported Income From Swiss Banks, contact the Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Consultation at www.TaxAid.usor www.TaxLaw.msor Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Call US before Uncle Sam finds you!

Source:

Forbes

 


Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help