Monthly Archives: February 2013

The European Commission requested consultations from the pubic regarding establishing an EU Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).

Title

Consultation on the "Use of an EU Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)" [short-name: EUTIN]

Policy fields

Taxation

Target groups

All citizens and organisations are welcome to contribute to this consultation. Contributions are particularly sought from individual citizens, businesses, tax practitioners, academics, intergovernmental, non-governmental and business organizations, tax administrations.

Period of consultation

From25.02.2013 to 17.05.2013

Objective of the consultation

The Commission adopted on 27th June 2012 a Communication on the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion. An Action Plan which details concrete proposals to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion was adopted on the 6th of December 2012.   One of the 34 measures contained in the Action Plan is the creation of a European Taxpayer Identification Number (EU TIN) which is described as follows (action 22):   "TINs are considered as providing the best means of identifying taxpayers under automatic exchange of information.   The national TINs are however built according to national rules which differ considerably and make it difficult for third parties (financial institutions, employers, other) to correctly identify and register foreign TINs and for the tax authorities to report back this information to the other tax jurisdictions.   The creation of an EU TIN might constitute the best solution to overcome the current difficulties faced by Member States in properly identifying all their taxpayers (natural and non-natural persons) engaged in cross border operations.   Whether this could be a unique EU number or the addition of an EU identifier to existing national TINs is an issue which should be further explored, as should be explored links with the other existing EU registration and identification systems.   Although the concept of an EU TIN is simple, its implementation is a complex issue which calls for a step-by-step approach.   A public consultation will be launched by March 2013. The presentation of a subsequent legislative proposal requires further in-depth studies and the strong support of the Member States. As a first step, a possibility would be to further develop the "TIN on EUROPA" portal, by making it possible to check the validity of national TINs by linking this application with Member States' databases." The Commission services are launching this public consultation in order to collect the opinions of all interested stakeholders on the creation of an EU Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). The Commission is seeking to collect information on the possible scope of an EU TIN (both in terms of operations and taxpayers covered), its practical aspects (including possible simplification and a step-by-step approach), its design and functioning, as well as various legal considerations (a.o. data protection).   The views expressed by the contributors will be used by the Commission services to identify the appropriate approach to the creation of an EU TIN and to develop the appropriate policy response.   The contributions may also be used in the possible preparation of the relating impact assessment.

The Joint Committee Released Their Explaniation of American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) of 2012.

This document, prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation in consultation with the staffs of the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance, provides an explanation of tax legislation enacted in the 112th Congress.

The explanation follows the chronological order of the tax legislation as signed into law. For each provision, the document includes a description of present law, explanation of the provision, and effective date. Present law describes the law in effect immediately prior to enactment. It does not reflect changes to the law made by the provision or subsequent to the enactment of the provision. For many provisions, the reasons for change are also included.

In some instances, provisions included in legislation enacted in the 112th Congress were not reported out of committee before enactment. As a result, the legislative history of such provisions does not include the reasons for change normally included in a committee report.

In some cases, there is no legislative history for enacted provisions. For such provisions, this document includes a description of present law, explanation of the provision, and effective date, as prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

In some cases, technical explanations of certain bills were prepared and published by the staff of the Joint Committee. In those cases, this document follows the technical explanations.

Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the ‘‘Code’’) unless otherwise indicated. 

File Size:  904.52 Kb 

File Type: pdf

U.S. states could collect millions of dollars in online sales taxes, with members of both parties in Congress sponsoring legislation that would resolve states' decades-long struggle to tax businesses beyond their borders.

A bipartisan group of 53 lawmakers in the Senate and House backed the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013 last Thursday, Febuary 15, 2013, which aims to resolve the differences between bills introduced in the Senate and House in the last Congress. 

The proposed legislation permits States to enforce the Collection of Sales & Use Taxes from Internet Retailers, placing them on a par with brick and mortar businesses.  

This Act permits States to require qualifying Sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes on remote sales, but the States must implement certain simplification requirements.  

In the last decade, Internet sales have gone from 1.6 percent of all U.S. retail sales to more than 5 percent, according to Commerce Department data, a proportion that will likely grow as shoppers turn more to handheld devices to make purchases. In the third quarter of 2012, retail "e-commerce" sales were $57 billion, the department said. 

Large Internet retailers are worried the tax could drive up the cost of doing business. They would also have to create new systems and software to collect the surcharges, adding to their costs.

Amazon said in July it prefers having the tax issue resolved at the federal level. States and cities say they can recoup billions of dollars with the tax. Some estimate around $11 billion in tax revenues are currently being lost, due to exempt internet sales.

In the last decade, Internet sales have gone from 1.6 percent of all U.S. retail sales to more than 5 percent, according to Commerce Department data, a proportion that will likely grow as shoppers turn more to handheld devices to make purchases. In the third quarter of 2012, retail "e-commerce" sales were $57 billion, the department said.

Large Internet retailers are worried the tax could drive up the cost of doing business. They would also have to create new systems and software to collect the surcharges, adding to their costs. Amazon said in July it prefers having the tax issue resolved at the federal level.

Tribes That Have Entered into Settlement Agreements of Tribal Trust Cases

1. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation

2. Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

3. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation

4. Bois Forte Band of Chippewa

5. Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Rancheria

6. Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation

7. Coeur d’Alene Tribe

8. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes

9. Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians

10. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

11. Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation

12. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe

13. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma

14. Hualapai Indian Tribe

15. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska

16. Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of Arizona 　

17. Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas

18. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

19. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

20. Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe

21. Lower Brule Sioux Tribe

22. Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Reservation

23. Mescalero Apache Tribe

24. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe

25. Nez Perce Tribe

26. Nooksack Indian Tribe

27. Northern Cheyenne Tribe of Indians

28. Omaha Tribe o Nebraska

29. Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine

30. Pawnee Nation

31. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation

32. Pueblo of Zia

33. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation

34. Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

35. Rincon Luiseño Band of Indians

36. Rosebud Sioux Tribe

37. Round Valley Indian Tribes

38. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

39. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska

40. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe

41. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation

42. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians

43. Spirit Lake Dakotah Nation

44. Spokane Tribe of Indians

45. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe

46. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians

47. Summit Lake Paiute Tribe

48. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community

49. Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians

50. Tohono O’odham Nation

51. Tulalip Tribes

52. Tule River Indian Tribe

53. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation

54. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe

55. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska

56. Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska

57. Tlingit & Haida Tribes of Alaska

58. Northwestern Band of Shoshone Indians

59. Hoopa Valley Tribe

60. Ak-Chin Indian Community

61. Oglala Sioux Tribe

62. Yurok Tribe

63. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe