Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: July 2013

IRS Can Subpoena a U.S. Bank on Behalf of the Mexican Taxing Authority!


The Tenth Circuit  of the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the denial of a motion by a Mexican citizen to quash a subpoena issued on behalf of the Mexican taxing authority (Villarreal v. United States, 10th Cir., No. 12-01131, 4/22/13).

The subpoena was issued by the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of the Mexican taxing authority, Servicio de Administracion Tributaria (SAT), to assist with SAT's investigation of Villarreal's 2009 tax liabilities. IRS's assistance was pursuant to an income tax treaty with Mexico.
 
The facts are straightforward. In March 2011, and pursuant to an income-tax treaty between the United States and Mexico, an official with Mexico’s taxing authority, the Servicio de Administraciόn Tributaria (SAT), asked the IRS for help in its investigation of Mr. Villarreal’s 2009 tax liabilities.
 
IRS issued a summons to the Bank that requested copies of account opening documents, signature cards, monthly statements, and certain deposit and withdrawal documents “pertaining to account no. [xxxxxxxx] and any other account associated with [Mr. Villarreal] (including any private banking
accounts associated with this account) for the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.”

Notice was sent to Mr. Villarreal as required by law, who then filed a motion to quash pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2). In the motion, Mr. Villarreal asked the district court to either quash the summons outright or conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the IRS acted in bad faith.

Mr Villarreal made a motion to quash the subpoena and the court ruled against his motion.

Are you a Mexican Hiding Assets in the US?

Contact the Tax Lawyers

at Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).




 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

What your Phone Can Reveal About You – Like How Many Days in the US?

In the modern world of communication, the cell phone has become an extension of ourselves, and some may even refer to it as 'the appendage that is not attached to you.' Your phone might be essential when it comes to organizing your business appointments, reminding you about your wedding anniversary and finding out the latest scores of the football game. However, if it were to fall into the hands of law enforcement officials, you might be surprised at the revealing things it will say about you. 

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) published a report that it obtained from a drug investigation by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, documenting the search and seizure of a suspect's iPhone from her bedroom. The agents were able to get personal information, including call logs, photos, videos, text messages, web history, and passwords for various services.


But the biggest surprise was the 659 previous locations of the phone invisibly gathered from wi-fi networks and cell towers. If you think a passcode or login safeguard is going to protect your information, you are sorely mistaken. Law enforcement have other tools at their disposal so that they can bypass your security measures, including mailing the phone to the manufacturer and having them extract the data. 

The legality of warrantless phone searches remains an open issue. For almost forty years, the Supreme Court has held that officers, when making any lawful arrest, have the right to search any containers found on the arrestee. ("Search incident to a lawful arrest"). A cellphone is like a briefcase or a notebook, and the law is clear that those items can be examined without a warrant when they are found on a person who is lawfully arrested. However, the Florida Supreme Court is currently reviewing the issue of warrantless cellphone searches incident to a lawful arrest. Until the Florida Supreme Court reaches a ruling, the law in State v. Glasco, 90 So. 3d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) is valid and binding across the state. The rule promulgated in that case was that when a suspect is lawfully arrested, some place other than a vehicle, police are allowed to seize and search a cellphone found on the suspect during the arrest. 

Losing Sleep Wondering How the IRS Will Know?

 

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers
at Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

Source:

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help