Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2013

Federal Courts Authorize John Doe Summonses Seeking Identities of Credit Card Use For Norweign Tax Authority!

Ten Lawsuits Initiated Pursuant to Tax Treaty Between United States and Norway; Seven Petitions Granted, Three Petitions Remain Pending
 
The Justice Department announced July 29, 2013 that federal courts in Minnesota, Texas, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Virginia and California have entered orders over the past week authorizing
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to serve John Doe summonses on certain U.S. banks and financial institutions, seeking information about persons who have used specific credit or debit cards in Norway. 

The summonses are referred to as “John Doe” summonses because the IRS does not know the identity of the person being investigated.  While orders have been entered in seven of these cases, the United States’ petitions in three additional cases remain pending. 

 
The lawsuits, filed on July 19 and 22, 2013, in nine federal districts, were initiated at the request of the Norwegian government under a treaty between Norway and the United States. 
 
The treaty allows the two countries to cooperate in exchanging information that is helpful in enforcing each country’s tax laws.  The United States is seeking the identities of persons who have used specific debit or credit cards issued by certain U.S. financial institutions so that Norway can determine if those persons have complied with Norwegian tax laws. A total of 18 U.S. financial institutions are identified in the government’s court filings. The filings do not allege that these financial institutions have violated any U.S. laws with respect to these accounts.
 
As alleged in court papers filed by the Justice Department, Norwegian authorities have reason to believe, based upon the use of payment cards in Norway that were issued by U.S. banks, that unidentified card holders may have failed to report financial account information or income on their Norwegian tax returns.  Court papers cite examples where individuals using non-Norwegian payment cards have claimed to be tax residents of other countries but were found to have resided in Norway for sufficient time to subject them to taxes in Norway.   
 
 “The Department of Justice and the IRS are committed to working with our treaty partners to fight tax evasion wherever it occurs,” said Kathryn Keneally, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Tax Division. “All taxpayers should know that our efforts in this area are global, coordinated and will continue.”
 
  “These summonses reflect our continuing efforts to work with our international partners on offshore tax evasion,” said Douglas O’Donnell, IRS Assistant Deputy Commissioner, Large Business & International (LB&I). “By using effectively our existing network of bilateral agreements, countries can help one another put an end to the global practice of evading taxation by hiding assets abroad.”
 
The lawsuits are a part of ongoing international efforts to stop persons from using foreign financial accounts as a way to evade taxes.  Courts have previously approved John Doe summonses allowing the IRS to identify individuals using offshore accounts to evade their U. S tax obligations. 
 
In the present suits, the Justice Department is seeking the identities of persons who may be attempting to hide their Norwegian taxable income in U.S. financial accounts. 
 
Becoming A Believer That Fiscal Transparency Really Exists?

Have Undeclared Income from an Offshore Account?

Contact the Tax Lawyers
at Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

 
 
Source:
 
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Advice on Self Cancelling Note and The Associated Gift & Estate Tax Consequences.

On 7/26/2013 the Office of Chief Counsel issued Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) 201330033,  where the IRS has addressed:  

ISSUES:

1.      Does all or any portion of the Date 1 transfers of stock from the decedent to the grantor trusts in exchange for the notes with the self-cancelling feature constitute a gift?
2.      How should the fair market value of the notes with the self-cancelling feature be determined? 
3.      If the Date 1 transfers do not constitute a gift, what are the estate tax consequences of the cancellation of the notes with the self-cancelling feature upon the decedent’s death?

FACTS: 

Taxpayer transferred stock to a grantor trust in return for notes receivable. The notes had the following terms:

1.      The term of the notes was based on the taxpayer's life expectancy as determined in the Sec. 7520 tables.
2.      Each note required only payments of interest during the note term and the payment of principal to the note holder on the last day of the term.
3.      Each of the notes contained a self-cancelling feature. This feature relieved the issuer of the obligation to make any further payments on the note if the taxpayer died before all of the payments under the note came due.
4.      The total face value of one group of the notes was almost double the appraised value of the stock transferred for those notes. The higher value of the notes supposedly compensated the taxpayer for the risk that he would die before the end of the note term and thus not receive the full amount of interest or any of the principal.
5.      The total face value of the rest of the notes equaled the appraised value of the stock transferred for those notes. To account for the possibility that the self-cancelling feature would take effect, these notes contained an above-market interest rate.
The taxpayer was in very poor health at the time of the transfer and died less than six months after the transfer. He received neither the interest payments nor the principal due on the notes. 

CONCLUSIONS

1.      1. If the fair market value of the notes is less than the fair market value of the property transferred to the grantor trusts, the difference in value is a deemed gift.
2.      The notes should be valued based on a method that takes into account the willing-buyer willing seller standard of § 25.2512-8 and should also account for the decedent’s medical history on the date of the gift.
3.      In this case, we believe there is no estate tax consequence associated with the cancellation of the notes with the self-cancelling feature upon the decedent’s death.
 
Need Help With Estate or Gift Taxes?

Contact the Tax Lawyers
at Marini & Associates, P.A.

 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

 

Source:

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Who Knew that Golf was such a Taxing Sport?

On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 we posted Professional Golfer Sergio Garcia "Whiffs" Tax Case regarding US Tax on "Image Rights" which discusses that the US Tax Court has ordered professional golfer Sergio Garcia to pay tax on endorsement income he had claimed was tax-free under the US-Switzerland tax treaty.
The court decided Garcia's contract with his sponsor TaylorMade had attributed too much of the money to royalty payments for image rights, which the treaty exempts from US tax.  p http://i.forbesimg.com t Move down

                    
Mickelson capped a dominant fortnight in Scotland by shooting a final round 66 to come from behind and win The Open Championship. He also won the Scottish Open the previous week. For his two weeks of play, earned £1,445,000, or about $2,167,500. 

The United Kingdom, which has authority to set Scotland’s tax rate until 2016, graduates to a 40% tax rate when income hits £32,010 then 45% when it reaches £150,000. Mickelson will pay £636,069 ($954,000, or 44.02%) on his Scottish earnings. 

But that’s not all. The UK will tax a portion of his endorsement income for the two weeks he was in Scotland. It will also tax any bonuses he receives for winning these tournaments as well as a portion of the ranking bonuses he will receive at the end of the year, all at 45%.  

The good news for Mickelson is that he can take a foreign tax credit on his US return so he is not double-taxed at the federal level on this income. The bad news is that the credit does not cover self-employment taxes (2.9%) or the new Medicare surtax (0.9%). Additionally, California does not have a foreign tax credit so he will have to fork out 13.3% there as well. Although he receives federal deductions for his California tax and half of his self-employment tax, these deductions do not benefit him on this income because as they reduce his federal tax they reduce his foreign tax credit. 

Without considering expenses, Mickelson will pay 61.12% taxes on his winnings, bringing his net take-home winnings to about $842,700. When expenses are considered (10% to caddy Jim “Bones” Mackay, airfare, hotel, meals, agent fees on endorsement income/bonuses—all tax deductible here and in the UK), his take-home will fall closer to 30%.
 
Professional Golfers & Athlete's Need Professional Tax Advice!
 
Don't Let The Taxing Authorities put you in the Ruff!
 
Need a Scratch Tax Attorney! 

Contact the Tax Lawyers
at Marini & Associates, P.A.

 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

 
 
 

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Releases 2010 Form 8805 -Foreign Partner's Information Statistics.

Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, U.S. partnerships are required to withhold income tax on "effectively connected taxable income" deemed allocable to foreign partners.

The U.S. partnership must file a Form 8805, Foreign Partner's Information Statement of Section 1446 Withholding Tax, to show the amount of effectively connected taxable income and the total tax credit allocable to the foreign partner for the partnership's tax year.

Foreign partners must attach this form to their U.S. income tax returns to claim a withholding credit for their shares of the Section 1446 tax withheld by the partnership.

New Advise Regarding Foreign Partners?

Contact the Tax Lawyers
at Marini & Associates, P.A.

 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

 

 

 Source:

IRS Issue Number:    2013 - 9

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help