Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: July 2016

US Expatriates Face Up to 25 Days to Complete ALL Required US Tax Forms!

Moodys Gartner a tax advisory law & chartered accounting firm has a chart where they estimated that the amount of time US expats spend filing their statutory tax declarations.

An analysis of this chart, considering only the most common types of forms that need to be filed annually for most ex-pats, indicate that it takes roughly 106 hours or 13 working days to for an Ex-Pat to complete the necessary forms for his/her annual US tax filing.

Depending on the complexity of the taxpayer's foreign country's tax affairs, the US Internal Revenue Service's estimate exceeds 25 working days for an Ex-Pat to complete the necessary forms for his/her annual US & Foreign Country's tax filings.

Now it's more important than ever for Ex-pats to file the return, as we previously postedTax Delinquents May Have Passports Canceled, where we discussed that the bill, known as the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (S. 1269), was approved by on May 13, 2015 and signed into law by President Obama on February 24, 2016 .

It includes amendments to the tax code that would allow authorities to revoke or deny the passport of any US taxpayer who has unpaid taxes in excess of $50,000 or who have not obtained or won’t provide a Social Security number.

 

Need Help With Your Ex-Pat Return?

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini & Associates, P.A.


for a FREE Tax Consultation

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888)882-9243.


 





 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Time to Compare Candidate's Tax Plans!

 

As the Republican and Democratic national conventions begin, it's a good time to compare and contrast each candidates tax plan

 Clinton Tax Plan         
Hillary Clinton proposes raising taxes
on high-income taxpayers, modifying
taxation of multinational corporations, repealing fossil fuel tax incentives, and increasing estate and gift taxes.

  • Her proposals would increase revenue by $1.1 trillion over the next decade.
  • Nearly all of the tax increases would fall on the top 1 percent; the bottom 95 percent of taxpayers would see little or no change in their taxes.
  • Marginal tax rates would increase, reducing incentives to work, save, and invest, and the tax code would become more complex.
  • The analysis does not address a forthcoming proposal to cut taxes for low- and middle-income families.
  Trump Tax Plan     


His plan would significantly reduce marginal tax rates on individuals and businesses, increase standard deduction amounts to nearly four times current levels, and curtail many tax expenditures.

  • His proposal would cut taxes at all income levels, although the largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households.
  • The plan would reduce federal revenues by $9.5 trillion over its first decade before accounting for added interest costs or considering macroeconomic feedback effects.
  • The plan would improve incentives to work, save, and invest.
  • However, unless it is accompanied by very large spending cuts, it could increase the national debt by nearly 80 percent of gross domestic product by 2036, offsetting some or all of the incentive effects of the tax cuts.

Candidates Differ on Taxing Corporations

The corporate income tax is a major revenue source for the U.S. government, but it has been shrinking for decades, and the three main presidential candidates could not differ more dramatically on what to do about it.

Trump Plan

Donald Trump, the Republicans' nominee for the Nov. 8 election, wants to cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 15%.

While the Tax Policy Center, a Washington D.C. based tax research group, has said that under Trump's plan, corporate income tax revenues would fall $1.9 trillion from 2016 to 2026, Trump, a real estate developer, described his proposals as revenue neutral, saying that reduced tax rates would be paid for by eliminating some tax breaks and repatriating corporate cash held overseas.

Steven Rosenthal, a Tax Policy Center senior fellow, said Trump's plan is a standard business focused approach, but notes that it was difficult to fully evaluate because the drafting was incomplete.

Clinton Plan
 
Hillary Clinton,  has not promised a corporate tax cut. Like Trump, she has called for closing loopholes that corporations use to avoid taxes.

But unlike Trump, her plan would raise corporate tax revenues by $136 billion over 10 years, the Tax Policy Center said.
                              

Have a Tax Problem?
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at 
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Mid-Year National Tax Advocate's Report is Wary of IRS' “Future State.”

In her 2016 mid-year report to Congress, National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA) Nina Olson has again expressed concern about IRS's “Future State” plans, which envisions how the agency will operate in five years and beyond. In addition, the NTA presented a review of the 2016 filing season and identified the priority issues that the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) will address during the upcoming fiscal year. IR 2016-97
For the last two years, the IRS has been developing a “Future State” plan that envisions how the agency will operate in five years and beyond.  A central component of the plan is the development of online taxpayer accounts. 

In the National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2015 Annual Report to Congress, Olson praised aspects of the plan but expressed concern that:

  1. The IRS’s intent in developing online accounts is largely to save money in light of recent budget cuts by reducing telephone and face-to-face assistance and 
  2. Many taxpayers will not conduct business with the IRS through online accounts because they lack Internet access or skills, cannot complete the authentication process required to set up an account, do not trust the security of the IRS system, or would prefer to speak with an IRS employee.  As a result, she expressed concern that critical taxpayer needs may go unmet under the Future State plan.

To provide a vehicle for direct public comment, Olson announced plans to hold Public Forums around the country, some in conjunction with Members of Congress who serve on committees actively engaged in IRS oversight.

To date, Olson has held eight Public Forums and has several more planned. Among the panelists at the Public Forums in Washington, DC, were representatives of four Federal advisory committees to the IRS and four major national organizations of tax practitioners.  Olson writes:

  “I continue to be concerned that the IRS’s design for the Future State ignores or dismisses the significant body of data that shows large portions of the taxpaying public is either unable or unwilling to engage with government online services for anything
other than the most routine tasks, if those.” 

The report also points out that only about 30 percent of taxpayers seeking to register for the IRS’s “Get Transcript” application over the last month were able to do so because of enhanced authentication measures, which suggests many taxpayers may not even be able to establish online accounts in the current environment.

Today’s report contains extended excerpts from the transcripts of the Public Forums, organized around key concerns that Olson identified in her earlier report or that panelists consistently raised. 

Information on the Public Forums, including complete transcripts, is available at http://taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/news/national-taxpayer-advocate-public-forums.

Olson announced that TAS will conduct a nationwide survey of a statistically representative sample of U.S. taxpayers about their needs, preferences, and experience with IRS taxpayer service and will hold focus groups on the IRS Future State at the IRS Tax Forums this summer.

Because the IRS Future State plan aims to establish how the IRS will interact with taxpayers in the coming years, TAS views it as its most important area of focus.  TAS’s overriding goal will be to work with the IRS to ensure the plan provides for high quality taxpayer service and the protection of taxpayer rights. 

Based on the results of the National Taxpayer Advocate Public Forums, the nationwide survey, and the Tax Forum focus groups, Olson plans to “set forth our vision of the IRS Future State in the 2016 National Taxpayer Advocate’s Annual Report to Congress.  This plan, I can say with confidence, will be based on taxpayers’ needs and preferences, as they and their representatives have expressed them to us.”

Olson also address the IRS' limited assistance with Tax-Law Questions.  Both on its phone lines and in its TACs, the IRS continued recent restrictions on answering tax-law questions.  During the filing season, the IRS answered only “basic” questions, deeming more complex questions “out of scope.” 

After the filing season, the IRS is not answering any tax-law questions at all, even though many taxpayers obtain legally authorized extensions of time to file.  Last year, nearly 15 million returns were submitted after the filing season.

Have a Tax Problem?

 

 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

US Offshore Tax Cheats Who Lied on Their Streamline Corrective Filings May Do Jail Time!

Bloomberg's article America’s Offshore Tax Cheats Are Feeling the Heat Once Again 
reports that U.S. taxpayers who entered into an IRS program that made it easier to disclose their hidden offshore bank accounts may have thought they put their legal troubles behind them.

 Instead, Prosecutors May Try To Put Some Of Them
In Jail For Not Telling All!
 

 We’re “taking all of that data and scrubbing it for leads,” Nanette Davis, a trial attorney in the Justice Department’s tax division, said at the New York University Tax Controversy Forum last week.   

The Effort Has Been Fruitful Already,
she said. With some taxpayers,

 
“We Say We Could Indict This Case Tomorrow,”
said Davis, who is overseeing the review.

The risk of being scrutinized falls on those taxpayers who came forward under the government’s so-called Streamlined Program. Those living in the U.S. paid penalties of 5 percent of their undisclosed offshore assets, while overseas residents paid none.

It’s been clear to us as tax advisers that the Justice Department might prosecute people who lied in their streamlined declarations.

IRS trial attorney John C. McDougal suggested at the conference that the review of the streamlined submissions isn’t as dire as Davis made it sound because they’re being looked at in the same way as other tax returns. The IRS has begun formal examinations in some of the cases, he said.

 

 Do You Have Undeclared Offshore Income?


 Want to Know if the Streamlined Program is Right for You?
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini& Associates, P.A.  
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help