Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: August 2016

U.S. Treasury Seeks Comments on Form 8975 – CbC Reporting Form

On May 5, 2016 we posted Possible CbC Optional Reporting for 2016 Under Consideration by US Treasury where we discussed that the Treasury and IRS were working towards a solution that would allow optional CbC reporting for 2016 and that more work would be needed to ensure that allowing optional filing for 2016 in the US would be effective in obviating the need for local filing. The Treasury and IRS also requested that US MNCs to engage in the global debate to ensure optional CbC reporting will be enough to protect US MNCs from becoming subject to secondary reporting requirements. 
The OECD recommended that the information required for the master and local files be filed by the MNEs directly with the local tax administrations. On the other hand, the CbC report would be filed in the jurisdiction of the tax residence of the ultimate parent entity and shared between jurisdictions through automatic exchange of information, pursuant to government-to-government mechanisms such as the multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, bilateral tax treaties, or tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs).
As noted above, the final BEPS Action 13 report recommends that data collection for CbC reporting purposes begin in 2016 for reporting/filing in 2017. Under the secondary mechanism, U.S. Multi-National Enterprisess may be required to file CbC reports directly with other countries in 2017, as a result of the one year gap between when the proposed regs are expected to be finalized and the CbC reporting requirements that are already in place in other countries for 2016.

The IRS had issued final regs. on June 29, 2016 that require annual country-by-country (CbC) reporting by U.S. persons that are the ultimate parent entity of a multinational enterprise (MNE) group that has annual revenue for the preceding annual accounting period of $850 million or more. This information reporting requirement is satisfied by submitting the just released Form 8975, Country-by-Country Report, with an income tax return. TD 9773, 06/29/2016, Reg. § 1.6038-4

On June 29, the same day that IRS issued final Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting regs, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) published guidance on the implementation of CbC reporting under Action 13 of the G20/OECD base erosion and profit shifting project. The guidance addresses issues arising due to the U.S.'s comparatively delayed implementation date for CbC reporting and specifically provides a voluntary, transitional filing optional called “parent surrogate filing.” OECD, “Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Reporting: BEPS Action 13” (June 29, 2016). 
 

Now on August 22, 2016, Treasury published a notice in the Federal Register seeking comments on IRS Form 8975 (Country-by-Country Report), which ultimate parent entities of U.S. multinational enterprise (MNE) groups will use for country-by-country (CbC) reporting purposes. Written comments are due by September 21, 2016.
The notice says that "businesses or other for-profits"
are to be affected by the new CbC
reporting requirement, which Treasury estimates
will take 4,680 Hours to comply with each year!


The Regulation § 1.6038-4(d)(1) says that the following information must be included on Form 8975 with respect to each constituent entity of the U.S. MNE group, as required:

  • The complete legal name of the constituent entity.
  • The tax jurisdiction, if any, in which the constituent entity is resident for tax purposes.
  • The tax jurisdiction in which the constituent entity is organized or incorporated (if different from the tax jurisdiction of residence).
  • The tax identification number, if any, used for the constituent entity by the tax administration of the constituent entity's tax jurisdiction of residence.
  • The main business activity or activities of the constituent entity.

In addition, Form 8975 must contain the following information for each tax jurisdiction in which one or more constituent entities of a U.S. MNE group is resident, presented as an aggregate of the information for the constituent entities resident in each tax jurisdiction (Reg. § 1.6038-4(d)(2)) :

  • Revenues generated from transactions with other constituent entities.
  • Revenues not generated from transactions with other constituent entities.
  • Profit or loss before income tax.
  • Total income tax paid on a cash basis to all tax jurisdictions, and any taxes withheld on payments received by the constituent entities.
  • Total accrued tax expense recorded on taxable profits or losses, reflecting only operations in the relevant annual period and excluding deferred taxes or provisions for uncertain tax liabilities.
  • Stated capital, except that the stated capital of a PE must be reported in the tax jurisdiction of residence of the legal entity of which it is a PE unless there is a defined capital requirement in the PE tax jurisdiction for regulatory purposes.
  • Total accumulated earnings, except that accumulated earnings of a PE must be reported by the legal entity of which it is a PE.
  • Total number of employees on a full-time equivalent basis-see Reg. 1.6038-4(d)(3)(iii) for the treatment of independent contractors and other details.
  • Net book value of tangible assets, which does not include cash or cash equivalents, intangibles, or financial assets.

The reporting period covered by IRS Form 8975 is the period of the ultimate parent entity's applicable financial statement prepared for the 12-month period (or a 52-53 week period described in Section 441(f)) that ends with or within the ultimate parent entity's tax year.

If the ultimate parent entity does not prepare an annual applicable financial statement, the reporting period covered by Form 8975 is the 12-month period (or a 52-53 week period described in Section 441(f)) that ends on the last day of the ultimate parent entity's tax year. (Reg. 1.6038-4(c)).

Whatever the reason for the strides, US Multi-National Entities may soon have an optional method for satisfying their CbC reporting requirements for 2016.
 
 Have an International Tax Problem?  

Contact the Tax Lawyersat

Marini & Associates, P.A.

 

 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at

or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Criminal Defense Lawyer's 5th Amendment Privilege Trumps an IRS Summon

Defense Lawyer Pleading The 5th Beats IRS Summons preview imageAccording to Law360, A Minnesota federal judge has denied the IRS’ request to enforce a summons against a local criminal defense lawyer the agency accused of hiding tax-related information, agreeing with his Fifth Amendment objection citing the right against self-incrimination.

Attorney Martin S. Azarian had provided the tax agency certain documents in response to a summons over his income taxes. The IRS then sued in Minnesota federal court to obtain more information from him that he allegedly improperly withheld. The attorney pushed back, asserting a reasonable fear of prosecution under the Fifth Amendment.
Agreeing with a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, U.S. District Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright ruled Tuesday that Azarian's Fifth Amendment privilege assertion is valid.

Have a Tax Problem?
 

 



Need to Quash an IRS Summons?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

In the late 1980s, two Texas attorneys, John Porter and Stacy Eastland, introduced a new discounting technique relating to the formation of family limited partnerships which resulted in discounts of 30% and more to the value of the artificially created family limited partnership (FLP).  This technique was an anathema to the Internal Revenue Service; a review of many estate tax court cases litigated in the last 20 years involve the discounts taken on  FLPs. The bulk of these discounts were related to intrafamily transfers, many times saving millions of dollars in estate tax.

Now, the Internal Revenue Service is fighting back. A proposed regulation would beef up section 2704 of the IRC of 1986 to preclude many of the presently available discounting techniques. In addition, this proposed regulation would expand the purview of section 2704 to include not only partnerships and corporations but LLCs, S corporations, and other family "business" transfer entities.

Part of the proposal includes drawing a bright line between the family members and nonfamily members for the purpose of allowing discounts. The proposed regulation would enable the IRS to attack any entity created prior to October 8, 1990.

What this regulation will look like when it is finalized is somewhat conjectural but be prepared to take a hit on the use of heavily discounted entities within intrafamily transfer transactions. It will be equally interesting to see what steps the estate tax planning community will take to try to blunt the thrust of these new regulations.

 Have a US Estate Tax Problem?

 

 


Estate Tax Problems Require
an Experienced Estate Tax Attorney
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 
Robert S. Blumenfeld  - 
 Estate Tax Counsel
Mr. Blumenfeld concentrates his practice in the areas of International Tax and Estate Planning, Probate Law, and Representation of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens before the IRS.

Prior to joining Marini & Associates, P.A., he spent 32 years as the Senior Attorney with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Deputy Commissioner, International.

While with the IRS, he examined approximately 2,000 Estate Tax Returns and litigated various international and tax issues associated with these returns.As a result of his experience, he has extensive knowledge of the issues associated with and the preparation of U.S. Estate Tax Returns for Resident and Non-Resident Aliens, Gift Tax Returns, Form 706QDT and Qualified Domestic Trusts.

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

FDR Held in Contempt for Intercepting an Approved Chapter 13 Bkcy Payment

Fla. Tax Agency In Contempt For Collection, 11th Circ. Says preview imageAccording to Law360, The Florida Department of Revenue must be held in contempt of a bankruptcy court after intercepting a payment to a federal employee whose Chapter 13 plan was already confirmed, the Eleventh Circuit ruled Thursday in upholding lower courts in the dispute.

  Have a Tax Problem?
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at 
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help