Monthly Archives: December 2016

Dave's take on this recent case is that taxpayers and some practitioners may believe that the era of IRS investigating offshore tax evasion has run its course.  He thinks this case does just the opposite.

The Court’s decision demonstrates that much of IRS’s data on offshore tax evasion is dated, possibly even too old to be of any value, but he also suspect that IRS has come to the same conclusion. 

Rather than moving on to other areas of non-compliance though, he suspects that the IRS at this moment is developing more tools to secure the next wave of current information on offshore tax evasion.  This does not bode well for taxpayers who so far have avoided IRS’s inquiry into their offshore holdings. To Read More...

According to Law 360 a California federal court Thursday authorized a John Doe summons by the IRS to obtain information from virtual currency exchanger Coinbase Inc. so it can investigate whether the company’s customers avoided paying taxes on transactions made through the company.

San Francisco-based Coinbase itself has not been accused by the IRS of engaging in nefarious activity, but the agency believes records of transactions made via the company’s currency exchange business could reveal the identities of individuals who have failed to pay taxes on transactions made via encrypted digital currencies between 2013 and 2015.

“Transactions in virtual currency are taxable just like those in any other property,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in a statement. “The John Doe summons is a step designed to help the IRS ensure people doing business in the emerging economy are following the tax laws and meeting their responsibilities.”

Unlike traditional cash or banking transactions, exchanges made via cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are anonymous and free of third-party reporting.

According to the IRS’s petition for the John Doe summons, the agency has identified at least one individual and two corporations that held Coinbase accounts and used bitcoin transactions to conceal taxable activities including repatriation of untaxed offshore assets.

The IRS also notes that because exchange rates of virtual currency against traditional currencies are fluid, gains made through the purchase or sale of cryptocurrency are taxable under U.S. law.

The summons will allow the IRS to gain access to Coinbase’s database of customers in order to establish whether those customers have paid their tax liabilities.

In granting the summons U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley found there is a reasonable basis for the government to believe virtual currency users may not be in compliance with federal tax laws.

Gerard Ryle, director of the ICIJ, said at the time, that the documents covered the day-to-day business at Mossack Fonseca over the past 40 years.

While no reference was initially made regarding U.S. clients; we correctly speculated that U.S. persons will probably show up, given that Mossack Fonseca apparently maintained a branch in Las Vegas, Nevada, under the name of M.F. Company Services and Mossack Fonseca Company Services was currently attempting to fight a subpoena brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada seeking information on at least 123 companies that it created.

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini& Associates, P.A.  

 

for a FREE Tax Consultation

at: www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com or

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243