Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2016

IRS corrects Notice Notice 2016-8 Regarding Changes to Withholding and FATCA Regs.

IRS has made several corrections in Notice 2016-8, Timing of Submitting Preexisting Accounts and Periodic Certifications; Reporting of Accounts of Nonparticipating FFIs; Reliance on Electronically Furnished Forms W–8 and W–9 .  

IRS has now made the following corrections to Notice 2016-8

1. Preexisting Account Certifications

Participating FFIs and reporting Model 2 FFIs are required to certify to IRS that, within the applicable timeframe for preexisting accounts, they have complied with the required procedures. This preexisting account certification must be made no later than 60 days following the date that is two years after the effective date of the FFI agreement.

In the revised version, IRS has now indicated that participating FFIs and reporting Model 2 FFIs must not only certify to IRS that they have complied with the due diligence procedures for preexisting accounts within the applicable timeframe, they must also certify that they did not have practices and procedures to assist account holders in the avoidance of chapter 4.

    2. Accounts of nonparticipating FFIs.
    A participating FFI or registered deemed-compliant FFI that maintains an account of a     nonparticipating FFI must provide transitional reporting to IRS of all foreign reportable amounts paid to or with respect to the account for each calendar year 2015 and 2016. A foreign reportable amount means foreign source payments described in Reg. § 1.1471-4(d)(4)(iv). Alternatively, a participating FFI or registered deemed-compliant FFI may report all income, gross proceeds, and redemptions paid to or with respect to an account held by a nonparticipating FFI, instead of reporting only foreign reportable amounts. (Reg. § 1.1471-4(d)(2)(ii)(F)) Similar transitional reporting rules apply to reporting Model 2 FFIs for accounts of nonparticipating FFIs for calendar years 2015 and 2016. (Notice 2016-8, Sec. III.A).
    In the revised version, IRS has deleted the reference to a registered deemed-compliant FFI and now only states that under Reg. § 1.1471-4(d)(2)(ii)(F), a participating FFI that maintains an account of a nonparticipating FFI (including a limited branch and limited FFI treated as a nonparticipating FFI) must provide transitional reporting to IRS of all foreign reportable amounts paid to or with respect to the account for each calendar year 2015 and 2016.

    Do You Have Undeclared Income from a Foreign Bank ?
     
     
    Is Your Name Being Handed Over to the IRS?
     
    Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You?
     
    Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
    Marini& Associates, P.A.  
     
    for a FREE Tax Consultation
    Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
     

    Sources:

    Thomson Reuters Checkpoint

    Bloomberg DTR

    Kluwer International Tax Blog

     

    Read more at: Tax Times blog

    Foreign Tax Credits Are Allowed Again on Income Earned In Cuba!

    According to Law360, the Internal Revenue Service in guidance released Tuesday March 1, 2015, removed restrictions on claiming credits for taxes on income earned in Cuba, removing a limitation that had been in place since 1987.
     
    The IRS said in the revenue ruling that the restrictions are removed as of December 21, 2015. The move is in line with President Barack Obama’s vow to begin normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba and lift restrictions on interstate money exchange, travel, trade, telecommunications and third-country financial transactions with the country.

    The U.S. Department of the Treasury maintains a list of countries in Revenue Ruling 2005-3 for which U.S. taxpayers cannot claim a credit for taxes paid on income earned in those countries. Other countries on the list include Iran, North Korea and Syria.

    Revenue Ruling 2016-08 removes certain restrictions on income earned in Cuba.  The previously applicable restrictions denied a foreign tax credit for income taxes paid to Cuba and disallowed deferral on income earned in Cuba through a controlled foreign corporation.

    Need Tax Advise on Investing in Cuba?
     
     
     
    Contact the Tax Lawyers at
    Marini & Associates, P.A.
    for a FREE Tax Consultation
    Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
     
     

    Read more at: Tax Times blog

    IRS Wins $3.5B ‘Guidant' Case Holding That The IRS Can Make §482 Adjustments on an Aggregate Basis

    A medical technology company and its subsidiaries lost their bid to challenge the Internal Revenue Service’s adjustments that increased their income by about $3.5 billion when the U.S. Tax Court ruled Monday, February 29. 2016 that the IRS acted well within its authority.
    The deficiencies and the accuracy-related penalty flow from respondent's transfer pricing adjustments under section 482 that increased the income of Guidant Corp. and its U.S. subsidiaries (collectively, Guidant group) by approximately $3.5 billion. The Guidant group filed consolidated Federal income tax returns, and respondent's adjustments stem from transactions that the Guidant group engaged in with the group's affiliated foreign entities.

    In consolidated cases, the Tax Court, denied taxpayers' summary judgment motion, and concluded that, when making transfer pricing adjustments under Code Sec. 482, IRS isn't required,
    contemporaneously with such adjustments, to determine the true separate taxable income (STI) of each controlled taxpayer in a consolidated group. Further, IRS is allowed to aggregate one or more related transactions instead of making specific adjustments under Code Sec. 482 with respect to each type of transaction.

    Respondent determined for purposes of ascertaining the Guidant group's consolidated taxable income (CTI) that all of the adjusted income was the separate taxable income (STI) of Guidant Corp. Respondent did not determine that any of the adjusted income was the STI of one or more of the Guidant group's U.S. subsidiaries. Respondent also did not determine the specific amount of the adjustments that related to tangibles, to intangibles, or to services.

    Petitioners moved for partial summary judgment, asserting that respondent's adjustments are arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable as a matter of law. Such is so, petitioners argue, because:
    1. Respondent did not determine the “true separate taxable income” of each controlled taxpayer in the Guidant group as required by section 1.482-1(f)(1)(iv), Income Tax Regs., and
    2. Respondent did not make specific adjustments with respect to each transaction involving an intangible, a purchase and sale of property, or a provision of services.
    Petitioners filed a memorandum in support of their motion and set forth their factual and legal positions in the memorandum. The parties argued their respective positions at a hearing held in New York, New York.  

    Judge David Laro denied Guidant’s motion for partial summary judgment, saying that the IRS has broad discretion to allocate income among controlled enterprises to either reflect income clearly or prevent tax evasion, and is not statutorily required to determine the true separate taxable income of each controlled taxpayer in a consolidated group while making transfer pricing adjustments.

    Judge David Laro also stated that the IRS is also allowed to aggregate one or more related transactions instead of making specific adjustments for each transaction type.

    In addition, the petitioners did not maintain financial records in a way that would have allowed them to readily track income and expenses by the place of manufacture and they were not able to tie income and expenses in a business unit’s financial statements to particular product lines, the judge said.

    Have A Tax Reporting Problem?  
     

    Contact the Tax Lawyers at
    Marini & Associates, P.A.
    for a FREE Tax Consultation
    Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

     

    Sources:

    Law360

    BNA DTR



     
     
     
     

     

     

     

    IRS Wins Major Decision in $3.5B ‘Guidant' Case

    The IRS scores a major victory as the U.S. Tax Court rules that the agency isn't obligated to determine the separate taxable income of each taxpayer in a consolidated group when making a transfer pricing adjustment.

    The court denies a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Guidant LLC in its $3.5 billion transfer pricing dispute. Guidant maintained that the IRS abused its discretion when it failed to determine the separate taxable income for each controlled taxpayer in the group, even though the company admitted that it had refused to produce critical financial data the IRS requested.

     

    Read more at: Tax Times blog

    US The New Tax Haven?

    A feature article in the Bloomberg suggests that some international families are moving their assets out of traditional offshore jurisdictions and into trusts in certain states of the US.
     
    It notes that some level of secrecy is still available in the US because Washington has not signed up to the OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for international information exchange, preferring instead its own Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
     

     

    By resisting new Global Disclosure Standards,
    the U.S. is creating a Hot New Market,
    becoming the Go-To Place to
    Stash Foreign Wealth.

     

    Everyone from London lawyers to Swiss trust companies are getting in on the act, helping the world's rich move accounts from places like the Bahamas and the British Virgin Islands to Nevada, Wyoming, and South Dakota.

     
    Some advisors discuss what type of trust can avoid both FATCA and GATCA reporting, including

    GATCA reporting if the US is treated as a Participating Jurisdiction and the assets do not even have to be located in the US. Since this structure requires a US-resident trustee, the trust could also be structured to avoid US taxation.

    The Economist adds that America seems not to feel bound by the global rules being crafted as a result of its own war on tax-dodging. It is also failing to tackle the anonymous shell companies often used to hide money. The Tax Justice Network, a lobby group, calls the United States one of the world’s top three “secrecy jurisdictions”, behind Switzerland and Hong Kong.

    No one knows how much undeclared money is stashed offshore. Estimates range from a couple of trillion dollars to $30 trillion. What is clear is that America’s share is growing.

    Need Legal Advise? 

     

    Contact the Tax Lawyers at
    Marini & Associates, P.A.

    for a FREE Tax Consultation
    Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
     

     
     
     
     
    Sources: 



      

     

    Read more at: Tax Times blog

    Live Help