Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2018

IRS Offers Penalty Relief to Many Subject to New Transition Tax

The Internal Revenue Service today June 4, 2018 announced in IR-2018-131 that it will waive certain late-payment penalties relating to the section 965 transition tax, and provided additional information for individuals subject to the section 965 transition tax regarding the due date for relevant elections.

The IRS explained the relief in three new FAQs, posted today on the agency’s tax reform page. These supplement 14 existing questions and answers that provide detailed guidance to taxpayers on reporting and paying the tax.

Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted in December 2017, imposes a transition tax on untaxed foreign earnings of foreign corporations owned by U.S. shareholders by deeming those earnings to be repatriated. Foreign earnings held in the form of cash and cash equivalents are taxed at a 15.5 percent rate, and the remaining earnings are taxed at an 8 percent rate. The transition tax generally may be paid in installments over an eight-year period when a taxpayer files a timely election under section 965(h).

In general, the questions and answers indicate that:

  • In some instances, the IRS will waive the estimated tax penalty for taxpayers subject to the transition tax who improperly attempted to apply a 2017 calculated overpayment to their 2018 estimated tax, as long as they make all required estimated tax payments by June 15, 2018.  
  • For individual taxpayers who missed the April 18, 2018, deadline for making the first of the eight annual installment payments, the IRS will waive the late-payment penalty if the installment is paid in full by April 15, 2019. Absent this relief, a taxpayer’s remaining installments over the eight-year period would have become due immediately. This relief is only available if the individual’s total transition tax liability is less than $1 million. Interest will still be due. Later deadlines apply to certain individuals who live and work outside the U.S. 
  • Individuals who have already filed a 2017 return without electing to pay the transition tax in eight annual installments can still make the election by filing a 2017 Form 1040X with the IRS. The amended Form 1040 generally must be filed by Oct. 15, 2018. 
  • See the FAQs for details.
Have an International Tax Problem?

  

 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.  

for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact Us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


  


Read more at: Tax Times blog

US Expats Having Their Accounts Frozen by US Banks

US banks are freezing accounts and investments for American expats to avoid the cost of money laundering and tax avoidance laws.
 
Hundreds of expats have had letters from Fidelity, Wells Fargo, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and other Us financial institutions to notify them that Their Accounts are Closed.
 
The banks say strict US know-your-customer rules and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) are too expensive to meet – even for customers with millions of dollars in their accounts.
The know-your-customer rules demand the financial institutions separate transactions that are not ‘normal’ and may indicate money laundering.
FATCA requires banks to tell the US Internal Revenue Service about account balances and investments held by American customers.

What the Letters Say

US financial institutions generally have a reciprocal duty to report the account details of foreign nationals (Individuals) to the IRS, which then transmits the data on to foreign tax authorities.
 
They also must monitor their customers who live overseas to ensure they are keeping to the local regulator’s rules as well and they may be different from those in the US, creating a dual compliance burden.
 
The time and cost involved in compliance has led many financial institutions to ditch non-profitable customers by letter and email.
 
The Merrill Lynch letters say:
 
“We have conducted an extensive review of our non-US resident client business to determine whether we had the ability to continue to effectively serve your wealth and investment needs under increasing business requirements and regulatory restrictions."
 
“Having completed this analysis, we believe you would be better served by a firm or firms that can meet your comprehensive wealth and investment management needs. Therefore, we will no longer be servicing your Merrill Lynch Wealth Management account(s) and/or credit facilities effective _DATE_”
 

Dilemma for American Expats

Customers are then asked to choose to transfer their accounts elsewhere or to have the money sent to them.
Taking the first option means investments are transferred without tax consequences or early drawdown penalties, but few financial institutions are willing to take on American customers because of the compliance consequences.
 
Why Now?

The rules were finalized two years ago, under the Obama administration, after almost two years of consultation. But implementation was deferred until now, to give the banks time to implement the new system.

A beneficial owner is defined as anyone who owns 25 per cent or more of a legal entity, and any individual who controls the legal entity, but several questions remain. In particular, the rules are not easy to understand when applied to complicated ownership structures, according to US law firm Sullivan and Worcester.

The banking agencies have not published any advice, so clients and practitioners have to rely on guidance from the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which released a frequently asked questions document last month.


This at least clarified that the customer due diligence (CDD) requirement applies whether the 25 per cent equity interests is held either directly or indirectly, no matter how complex its corporate structure or how many layers of ownership there are.

FinCEN also suggests that levels of ownership lower than 25 per cent might justify CDD in some cases, though legally the 25 per cent level is all that is required. But it says customer identification programmes should be risk-based, and a customer that presents many risks could justify going below the 25 per cent level.
Besides American expats, thousands of so-called ‘Accidental Americans’ have been caught in the compliance net because their parents were US citizens, even if they have never set foot in the country. 

Have an International Tax Problem?
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact Us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

 

Sources:

   

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Taxpayer Not in TorB of Flipping Houses & Could Not Take Associated Expenses

The Tax Court in Samadi, TC Summary Opinion 2018-27, has determined that a taxpayer who decided to flip houses with a group of friends and family and obtained his real estate license wasn't entitled to mileage deductions for taking members of the group to see potential properties.

The Court found that the taxpayer's real estate activity didn't rise to the level of a trade or business, where the group never actually purchased any properties and the taxpayer never earned any real estate commissions. 

Ya Think?
 
 
Have an IRS Tax Problem?  

     

     Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

    Marini & Associates, P.A. 

     

     
    for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact us at:
    or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

The US is Now the 2nd Largest Tax Haven and is Scheduled to be Blacklisted by the EU!

The U.S. is the world’s second-largest tax haven, behind Switzerland and just ahead of the Cayman Islands, according to a report released May 15, 2018.
 
The Financial Secrecy Index, an assessment of global financial centers compiled by the Tax Justice Network, a left-leaning research and advocacy group, bumped up the U.S. from its No. 3 spot in 2015, the last time the study was conducted, following its increased share of the global market for offshore financial services.

The US Now Accounts for about 22% of the Global Market in Offshore Services, up from 14%, According to the Report.

“While the United States has pioneered powerful ways to defend itself against foreign tax havens, it has not seriously addressed its own role in attracting illicit financial flows and supporting tax evasion,” the report said. The authors criticized the U.S. for its “independent-minded approach” to cracking down on tax evasion, money laundering and financial crime.

Delaware, Nevada and Wyoming were highlighted as hot spots for secretive “shell” companies, with nominee officers and directors who serve as a front for the actual, hidden owners.

Hong Kong ranks as the fourth most secretive financial jurisdiction, followed by Singapore at No. 5. Taiwan was included for the first time and ranks No. 8.

The index, which is published every two years, ranks countries on their laws regarding the transparency of ownership structures, bank secrecy rules and financial reporting and disclosure requirements. Scores are weighted for size. This 2018 report also used a new criteria including whether countries provide public registers of ownership and annual accounts for limited partnerships. 

This fact about the US being considered a Tax Haven, is also backed up by the European Parliament's report released on March 7, 2017 stated that although the U.S. has a robust legal framework to fight the financing of terrorism and to address money laundering, there are a number of shortcomings such as a “generally unsatisfactory” system for exchanging information on the true beneficial owners of companies and challenges with enforcing internal controls, according to the report from the European Parliamentary Research Service.

“By resisting new global disclosure standards, it provides an array of secrecy and tax-free facilities for nonresidents at federal and state levels, notably in Nevada, Delaware, Wyoming and South Dakota,”

The report expressed concerns about the future direction of U.S. economic policy under President Donald Trump and the consequent impacts on Europe. Trump’s demonstrated preference for bilateral relations with individual European Union members rather than with the bloc as a whole could lead to “a potential U.S. disengagement with EU integration,”

The completion of a framework for regulatory cooperation on financial services in an ambitious EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership could also be under jeopardy in the changing U.S. economic environment, the report said. 

“U.S. International Tax Rules are Disharmonious
with the Rest of the World,” the report said.  



Now as a result of the US being a tax haven, it may be placed on the European Union's blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions next June, if it fails to amend its Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act transparency rules to meet EU standards, according to tax accountants EY. The US Tax Cuts & Jobs Act 2017 has already been referred to the OECD Forum for Harmful Tax Practices.

The US May Be Placed on the European Union’s Blacklist of Noncooperative Jurisdictions Next June 2019 If It Fails to Amend Its Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act Transparency Rules to Meet EU Standards.
The U.S. is on the clock as the 2019 deadline nears for adopting and applying the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s common reporting standard, Valere Moutarlier, the EU’s head of direct taxation, told a new European Parliament tax investigative committee May 15. 
 
Have an International Tax Problem?
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact Us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).


Sources:

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help