Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2019

Program requiring the IRS to hire private debt collection agencies is putting taxpayers at risk

The new program requiring the Internal Revenue Service to hire private debt collection agencies is falling far short of its goals and putting taxpayers at risk of falling prey to scammers, according to a new government report.

The report, from the Government Accountability Office, found that the IRS's private collectors recovered less than 2 percent of over $5 billion in debts. The GAO said the IRS's reports to Congress on the private debt collection program haven’t provided complete financial information either. For example, as of September 2018, the IRS reported program revenue collections of about $89 million and costs of $67 million, suggesting a positive balance of $22 million for the Treasury’s general fund. However, the GAO pointed out the IRS report didn’t clarify that approximately $51 million of the amount collected went to the Treasury and the remaining $38 million was retained by IRS in two special funds to pay for current and future program costs.

“Without this information, Congress has an incomplete picture of the program's true costs and revenues,” said the GAO.

The GAO said the IRS also hasn't fully assessed the potential taxpayer risks in the program. The IRS has documented six risks, including "imposter scams," in which scammers pose as private collectors, but the GAO has identified 10 additional risks.

The current program is the result of legislation passed by Congress in 2015 with a provision requiring the IRS to set up another private debt collection program. The IRS eventually hired three contractors, and began assigning them cases in April 2017.

The GAO found that the IRS hasn’t analyzed the results of the program to identify the types of cases that should not be assigned to collection agencies because they do not result in collections.

The GAO's analysis of IRS data found that between April 2017 and September 2018 about 73,000 of 111,000 cases closed by collection agencies had little or no revenue collected because the collection agencies weren’t able to contact the taxpayer or collect the debt, among other reasons.

“Given the costs associated with managing these cases, without such analyses, the IRS may continue to use resources inefficiently and assign cases with little or no potential for revenue collection, or miss opportunities to assign other cases that could produce more revenue,” said the GAO.

The IRS has identified and taken steps to mitigate some of the program risks that could harm taxpayers, the GAO acknowledged. However, the service hasn’t yet completed the process of identifying and documenting all the risks, and has not fully assessed the risks to taxpayers from the program or its response to these risks.

An IRS official contended that the program has brought in significant revenue since the IRS began assigning cases in April 2017 to private collection agencies.

 “Since that time (through the end of FY 2018) we have assigned over 730,000 cases to PCAs and recovered over $88 million in overdue tax debts for the government,” wrote Kirsten Wielobob, deputy commissioner for services and enforcement at the IRS.
 “The current PDC program has already proven itself to be significantly more effective in the first two years, as compared to its prior iterations.”

She also disagreed with the GAO’s contention that the IRS’s reports to Congress on the program had not provided complete financial information.

A group representing the private tax debt collectors also responded to the report. “The PCA’s welcome effective program oversight, have a strong compliance record, and are always looking for opportunities to improve as the IRS expands the successful Private Debt Collection Program,” said a statement from the Partnership for Tax Compliance. We would look forward to sitting down with GAO staff sometime soon to discuss the program’s proven success.”

 

Have a IRS Tax Problem? 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

 

 

Marini& Associates, P.A. 

 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:
orToll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

Sources

GAO

accountingTODAY

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Issued Guidance on Disclosure to Spouses Who Filed Joint Returns & Then Divorce or Separate

IRS's Small Business/Self-Employed Division has issued guidance to its employees IRS Memo SBSE-05-0419-0010 regarding what collection activity information can and cannot be disclosed with respect to a couple's joint return, where the couple has subsequently divorced or are separated and no longer reside in the same household.

If any tax deficiency with respect to a joint return is assessed, the couple are no longer married or no longer reside in the same household, and either joint filer makes a request in writing, IRS must disclose in writing to the individual making the request whether it has tried to collect the deficiency from the other filer, the general nature of those collection activities, and the amount collected. (Code Sec. 6103(e)(8))

Upon receipt of either a verbal or written request from a taxpayer or his authorized representative, IRS may disclose limited information related to the collection of the tax from the other individual with whom the taxpayer filed a joint return when the taxpayer and the other individual are no longer married or are separated and no longer reside in the same household. Verbal requests will be honored if received from either spouse or his/her authorized representative, after verifying the identity of the person making the request to determine his/her right to the information. Disclosures made pursuant to Code Sec. 6103(e)(8) are limited to the specific tax period associated with the requester's joint deficiency, and the information should not be disclosed if its release will seriously impair federal tax administration.

Information that may be disclosed verbally upon receipt of a verbal or written request from a spouse who has been assessed the joint tax include:

  1. Whether IRS has attempted to collect the deficiency from the other spouse,
  2. The amount collected, if any, and the current collection status (e.g., notice, taxpayer delinquent account (TDA), installment agreement, offer in compromise, suspended), and 
  3. If suspended, the reason for suspension. (e.g., unable to locate, hardship, etc.)

Information which IRS employees cannot disclose includes:

  1. The other spouse's location or telephone number,
  2. Any information about the other spouse’s employment, income, or assets, and/or
  3. The income level at which a currently not collectible account will be reactivated.

The guidance provides several examples, including the following:

Illustration 1: Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer filed a joint return for tax year 2016. They are now divorced and have mirrored assessments under MFT 31 for the year 2016. "Mirrored assessments" is the process of duplicating a joint account into two "MFT 31" accounts, one for each spouse. Mr. Taxpayer recently submitted an accepted offer in compromise (OIC). Mrs. Taxpayer calls in and asks if IRS has tried contacting her husband as he has told her that he owes no more monies for the 2016 tax year. An IRS employee determines that there IRS records show a TC 480, Offer in Compromise Pending and TC 780, Master File Account Compromised posted to her MFT 31 module. While speaking with Mrs. Taxpayer, the employee can tell her that the account does reflect an OIC submission (TC 480) and acceptance (TC 780). He can relay what payments/refund offsets have credited to her MFT 31 and her current outstanding balance.

Illustration 2. Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer filed a joint return for tax year 2016. They are now divorced and have mirrored assessments under MFT 31 for tax year 2016. Mrs. Taxpayer has a continuous wage levy, and the payments have credited to Mr. Taxpayer’s MFT 31 module. Mr. Taxpayer calls in to ask if IRS is receiving regular payments from his ex-spouse. While speaking with Mr. Taxpayer, an IRS employee can tell him that IRS is collecting monies from Mrs. Taxpayer; each month IRS is receiving $475.00 that is being credited to his 2016 module. The source of payment however, is not shareable. The employee also can relay what payments have credited to his MFT 31 module. The employee can relay his current outstanding balance. He cannot disclose any information about the other spouse's employment, income, or assets.

IRS noted that this guidance supersedes the current instructions found in IRM 5.1.22.3.1.


Have an IRS Tax Problem

With a Former Spouse? 


Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini& Associates, P.A. 
 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:
Call Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243 
 



 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Reports Tax refunds down $4.4B for 2018 Tax Filings

The Internal Revenue Service reported a $4.4 billion decline in total tax refunds as of April 19, the first tax season under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with the average size of tax refunds down about 2 percent.

The total number of tax refunds increased slightly, from 95,434,000 to 95,737,000, a 0.3 percent increase. The total amount of tax refunds declined 1.7 percent, though, from $265.326 billion to $260.919 billion.

The average amount of the refund also dipped 2.0 percent, from $2,780 to $2,725.


At the same time, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also eliminated the personal and dependent exemptions. The IRS recommended last year that taxpayers adjust their withholdings with a "paycheck checkup" using its online withholding calculator to avoid withholding too little this year. Nevertheless, relatively few taxpayers actually

The 2017 tax overhaul eliminated or sharply limited a host of tax deductions, including widely used ones like the state and local tax deduction. Taxpayers can write off only $10,000 in state and local taxes from their federal taxes now. That provision has been attacked by lawmakers in so-called "blue states" that traditionally vote for Democrats. In exchange, the tax law doubled the size of the standard deduction and lowered tax rates overall, prompting more taxpayers to skip itemizing this year.  

2019 FILING SEASON STATISTICS

Cumulative statistics comparing 4/20/2018 and 4/19/2019
 

Individual Income Tax Returns:   

2018

2019

% Change

Total Returns Received  136,919,000 137,233,000 0.2
Total Returns Processed   130,477,000 130,775,000 0.2
       

E-filing Receipts:

     
TOTAL              124,515,000 126,264,000 1.4
Tax Professionals  70,983,000 70,476,000 -0.7
Self-prepared   53,532,000 55,788,000 4.2
       

Web Usage:

     
Visits to IRS.gov  386,895,000 421,514,000 8.9
       

Total Refunds:

     
Number  95,434,000 95,737,000 0.3
Amount  $265.326 Billion  $260.919 Billion -1.7
Average refund  $2,780 $2,725 -2.0
       

Direct Deposit Refunds: 

     
Number  80,491,000 83,249,000 3.4
Amount  $236.851 Billion  $238.381 Billion  0.6
Average refund  $2,943 $2,863 -2.7


The vast majority of taxpayers saw their taxes reduced over the course of last year, but many of them didn't notice the difference in their paychecks. The IRS faced complaints from many taxpayers who ended up owing far more money than they expected or getting a lower tax refund than anticipated. In response, the IRS lowered the threshold for imposing tax penalties on taxpayers who underwithheld or paid too little in estimated taxes last year. The IRS is again urging taxpayers to check their withholdings now that tax season is over.

However, the IRS is also planning to roll out a newly revised Form W-4 next month that will again require many taxpayers to adjust their withholdings. They will likely need to get help from tax professionals because it is expected to be even more complicated to use than last year's form. An early draft of the form provoked complaints last year from accounting and tax professional groups because it asked for much more information than usual about outside sources of income from spouses and others.

Have a IRS Tax Problem? 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini& Associates, P.A. 
 
 
for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:
orToll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243 
 





Sources:
IRS
accountingTODAY
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Zurich Life Insurance Rolls Over on Their US Clients

According to DoJ, Zurich Life Insurance Company Ltd (Zurich Life), headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, and Zurich International Life Limited (Zurich International Life), headquartered in the Isle of Man (collectively Zurich) reached a resolution with the United States Department of Justice on April 24, 2019. As part of the agreement, Zurich will pay a penalty of $5,115,000 to the United States.

According To The Terms Of The Non-Prosecution Agreement, Zurich AFREES To COOPERATE In Any Related Criminal Or Civil Proceedings,
to implement controls to stop misconduct involving undeclared u.s. accounts, and to pay a penalty in return for the department’s agreement not to prosecute the insurance providers for tax-related criminal offenses.
“The Tax Division remains steadfast in its goal of ending the use of offshore banking and insurance products when used to commit tax evasion,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Zuckerman.
“This Resolution With Zurich Should Serve As A Strong Message To Those Who Use Offshore Bank Accounts And Insurance Products To Evade Taxation That The Department Of Justice Is Committed To Stopping Such Fraud.”  
Zurich Life was founded in 1922 and operates in Switzerland as an insurance carrier offering life insurance and investment products. As of 2016, Zurich Life had approximately $21.3 billion in assets under management and over 300,000 policies in force. Zurich International Life is based in the Isle of Man and operates as an insurance carrier offering life insurance and investment products. Zurich International Life focuses its business on the international expatriate market.
As Of 2016, Zurich International Life Had Approximately $10.6 Billion In Assets Under Management And Approximately 300,000 Policies In Force.
Zurich Life and Zurich International Life are indirectly owned subsidiaries of Zurich Insurance Group Ltd, a Swiss holding company headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.
From Jan. 1, 2008, through June 30, 2014, Zurich issued or had certain insurance policies and accounts of U.S. taxpayer customers, who used their policies to evade U.S. taxes and reporting requirements. In particular, Zurich had approximately 420 U.S. related policies, 127 with Zurich Life and 293 with Zurich International Life, with an aggregate maximum value of approximately $102 million, for which the U.S. taxpayer customers did not provide evidence that they had declared their policies to U.S. tax authorities.
To Qualify For Favorable Tax Treatment Under The U.S. Tax Code, Insurance Must Meet Certain Minimal Requirements. The Policies Offered By Zurich Life And Zurich International Life Did Not Meet These Requirements.
The increase of the principal in these policies was therefore subject to taxation, and the policies were required to be disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on FinCEN Form 114 Foreign Bank Account Report, commonly referred to as an FBAR. In issuing or having undeclared U.S. related policies, Zurich knew or should have known that they were helping U.S. taxpayers conceal from the IRS ownership of undeclared assets, maintained as insurance policies or accounts.
Zurich International Life, in particular, sold insurance products to U.S. taxpayers that were “unit linked,” meaning the cash surrender value and death benefit amount were linked to the value of specified investments. With such policies, the U.S. taxpayer had a suite of specialized investment options, allowing them to access potentially higher returns by taking on the market risk associated with the policies.
Some of these unit-linked policies offered a base death benefit that was nearly equivalent to the cost of the policy itself, and in some instances was fully funded by transfers from offshore bank accounts. Upon redemption, the U.S. taxpayer would receive the premium amount plus any investment earnings on the policy less a very small percentage for putative risk and fees.
Despite knowing that some of these policies, which had minimal-to-no risk mitigation function and specialized investment options, were held by U.S. taxpayers, Zurich International Life failed to act appropriately to ensure timely compliance by the policyholders with U.S. tax laws. In at least one instance, uncovered during the course of Zurich Life’s internal review, a former U.S. citizen, who pled guilty to a federal fraud offense after purchasing a Zurich International Life policy, used that insurance policy to hide substantial assets, despite owing approximately $900,000 in restitution to his victims.
Following the commencement of the Department’s Swiss Bank Program, the Zurich Group initiated a global review of the life insurance, savings and pension business sold by all of its non-U.S. operating companies to identify policies or accounts with U.S. indicia. This review prompted an extensive customer outreach to current and former customers with a possible nexus to the United States to confirm the customers’ status as U.S. taxpayers, assess their compliance with applicable U.S. tax and reporting rules, and encourage participation in an IRS voluntary disclosure program.
In July 2015, Zurich contacted the Department to inform it of the initial findings of the self-review. Prior to the self-reporting, Zurich was neither a subject nor a target of any investigation being conducted by the Tax Division.
Since This Self-Disclosure, Zurich Has Conducted A Thorough Investigation And Reported Substantial Findings To The Tax Division, Including Dozens Of Detailed Summaries Of Account Information And Comprehensive Reports For U.S. Policies.
In addition to these efforts, the Companies have worked closely with non-U.S. regulators to ensure full disclosure to the Department. For instance, in 2016, Zurich Life applied to the Swiss Federal Department of Finance and received approval to waive Article 271 of the Swiss Criminal Code, which restricted the disclosures that Zurich Life could make to the Department, thereby facilitating Zurich Life’s production of certain information that would have otherwise been prohibited.
Do You Have Undeclared Income From
An Offshore Bank or Insurance Company?
 
Is Your Name Being Handed Over to the IRS?
  
Want to Know Which Remaining IRS Program
 is Right for You? 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help