Yearly Archives: 2019

Why Do Expats Care About Citizenship Renunciation?

Every quarter, the Federal Register publishes an update of American citizens who have renounced their citizenship. Citizenship renunciation is an issue that especially affects expat since they are faced with the lifelong burden of reporting American expatriate taxes (and sometimes, depending on the amount of income the expat generates, a tax paying burden as well!). Currently, the only way to rid themselves of this requirement is to renounce citizenship – a very permanent decision.

For a long time, expats have wanted to have a bigger say in the political sphere about tax fairness, but have felt ignored by politicians and are stuck with a requirement to pay or report American expatriate taxes.

The stakes are particularly high for expats, who are often unaware of the lingering filing requirements and can have their passports revoked if they are too far behind on filing American expatriate taxes.

Recently, the Tax Fairness for Americans Abroad Act was proposed, which would exempt expats’ foreign earned income from US taxation. Though this is good news, the bill is still far from becoming law, and for now, renunciation is the only recourse to what many feel are unfair taxation and financial reporting requirements.

A Brief History of Citizenship Renunciation Numbers

In 2017, the breakdown of the 5,132 renunciation numbers was as follows:

• Q1: 1,313
• Q2: 1,758
• Q3: 1,376
• Q4: 685

In 2018, the 4,050 renunciation numbers were:

• Q1: 1,168
• Q2: 1,093
• Q3: 1,104
• Q4: 685

Overall, in 2018 the numbers were lower than 2017 by around 20 percent, so it seems that, in general, we’re experiencing a return to more normal renunciation rates.

However, the fourth quarter drop off occurred again, suggesting that expats and American residents in general don’t renounce as often in the fourth quarter, whatever their reasons may be.

Perhaps the last three months of the year are so holiday-laden that Americans worldwide find their wallets light and the expense to renounce too much to bear. The cost to renounce is $2,350 after having undergone a 422% increase in 2015, which is the highest fee in the world. Plus, if you meet certain thresholds, you may also have to pay the exit tax, which can be extremely costly. The thresholds are met if any of the following are true:

• Your average annual net income tax for the five years before the date you renounce exceeds a certain amount that is adjusted for inflation each year (in 2018, the amount is $165,000).
• Your net worth is $2 million or more on the date of your expatriation.
• You did not certify on Form 8854 that you are fully compliant with your US tax obligations for the five years prior to your expatriation.

The way the exit tax is calculated is by deeming all your assets sold on the day before you expatriate; you would then be taxed on the associated capital gain, which can be taxed at a rate as high as 23.8%. But for some, this is still the best option in order to bypass the reporting and financial headaches that come along with American expatriate taxes.

Former U.S. citizens also will face difficulty in even coming back into the United States for visits.

And it's a choice you can't change. The State Department's website page devoted to renunciation of U.S. citizenship elaborates on the rules and process of surrendering your American persona. The final section notes: 

"Finally, those contemplating a renunciation of U.S. citizenship should understand that the act is irrevocable, except as provided in section 351 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1483), and cannot be canceled or set aside absent successful administrative or judicial appeal. (Section 351(b) of the INA provides that an applicant who renounced his or her U.S. citizenship before the age of eighteen can have that citizenship reinstated if he or she makes that desire known to the Department of State within six months after attaining the age of eighteen. See also Title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, section 50.20).
 

Renunciation is the most unequivocal way in which a person can manifest an intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Please consider the effects of renouncing U.S. citizenship, described above, before taking this serious and irrevocable action.

 

 

So you better make sure you know all the costs, tax and otherwise, of no longer being a citizen of the United States."

"Should I Stay or Should I Go?"

 

Need Advise on Expatriation?

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

  

For a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:

www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDP.com or

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ( 888 882-9243)

• Has the passage of ObamaCare with its associated additional 3.8% Obama Care Tax make you feel like leaving the country?

• Or perhaps you're so sick of liberal Democrats trying to socialize the United States by taxing wealthy people?

• Or maybe you're a naturalized U.S. citizen or permanent resident who has prospered here, but would now like to move back the old country for retirement or to start a new venture?

Whatever your motives, just because you leave the United States and renounce your citizenship, don't assume you can leave U.S. taxes (or U.S. tax forms and complexity) behind, particularly if you are financially well-off.

For those who expatriate after June 16, 2008, the rules are different, since Internal Revenue Code Section 877A applies instead of Section 877. You are subject to an immediate exit tax, which deems you (for tax purposes) to have sold all of your worldwide property for its fair market value the day before your departure from the U.S.

In 1994 a Forbes cover story described how such wealthy Americans as Campbell Soup heir John (Ippy) Dorrance III, the late Carnival founder Ted Arison and Dart Container heir Kenneth Dart had given up their U.S. citizenship and avoided U.S. income or estate tax. Perhaps the most clever was Dart, who managed to come back "home" as the Belize ambassador to the U.S., manning a newly opened Belize embassy in Sarasota, Fla., right where he had previously lived! Since that time, Congress has repeatedly tightened the screws on tax-motivated expatriation.

1. Uncle Sam taxes income worldwide.
The U.S. is unusual in that it asserts the right to tax the worldwide income (and at death assets) of its citizens and those who have become permanent residents. It doesn't matter where you live, where the income is earned, or where else you might pay tax. Yes, you may receive foreign tax credits on your U.S. Form 1040 for taxes you pay elsewhere and those credits will offset some (but typically not all) of the financial burden of paying tax in multiple jurisdictions. But the key point is that if you are a U.S. citizen or a permanent U.S. resident, no matter where you move, Uncle Sam will assert a claim on your wealth. So being a U.S. citizen can be expensive.

2. Expatriating means really leaving.
To even think about putting himself beyond the reach of the Internal Revenue Service, a citizen must give up U.S. citizenship and (in the case of citizens subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 877) severely limit the time spendy in the U.S. to not more than 30 days a year. Under that section, a person who attempts to renounce U.S. citizenship but then spends more than 30 days a year in the U.S. will be treated as a U.S. citizen or resident for that year. You may think no one has ever done this, but many have. Permanent U.S. residents (holding green cards) also pay U.S. tax on their worldwide income. They may find it easier to take the expatriation plunge, particularly if family or business opportunities beckon in their country of origin.

3. The old 10-year window is closed.
Back in 1966 Congress enacted the Foreign Investors Tax Act of 1966, signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson. Essentially expatriates were subject to U.S. tax on their U.S.-source income at normal U.S. tax rates for a full 10 years following their expatriation. Significantly, though, a person could avoid this tax entirely if he did not have as one of his principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. federal income, estate or gift taxes. Of course few people would admit they had a principal purpose of tax evasion, and the government had a hard time proving it. Suffice it to say that there were lots of people (with good lawyers) marrying foreigners, returning to the country of their birth, etc. The system didn't work very well, and little tax was collected.

 

Need Advise on Expatriation? 
 

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

 

For a FREE Tax Consultation at:

www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ( 888 882-9243)  

 

According to International Investment, the number of expats hits a record high of 258 million, this increasing global movement of people is driving significant demand for international tax advice. 

According to Law360, a recent U.S. Tax Court decision may open up a new avenue to challenge a tax code provision that prohibits deductions and credits for marijuana businesses, as several court judges said the provision may amount to an unconstitutional excessive penalty.

Earlier this month, the Tax Court in an opinion with multiple partial dissents, upheld a $1.2 million tax deficiency for a California medical marijuana company, rejecting its arguments that Internal Revenue Code Section 280E is a penalty and an unconstitutional excessive fine that violated the Eighth Amendment.

Section 280E, which forbids a business to take credits or deductions when trafficking in a controlled substances, was enacted under Congress’ “unquestionable authority” pursuant to the 16th Amendment , which grants Congress the power to collect taxes on income, the majority opinion said. Section 280E does not violate the Eighth Amendment , which prohibits excessive fines, because the disallowance of deductions is a matter of “legislative grace,” not a penalty, the opinion said.

However, in an opinion dissenting in part, Judge David Gustafson said he would have held Section 280E unconstitutional because the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax “income,” which is a gain or profit, but the disallowance of all deductions under Section 280E results in a tax on something that is different from someone's “income” within the meaning of the 16th Amendment.

Since then, 10 states have legalized marijuana, Illinois is slated to legalize cannabis beginning Jan. 1, 2020, and 33 other states and Washington, D.C., have permitted the use of medical marijuana. As marijuana use becomes more mainstream, Section 280E is effectively penalizing businesses trying to legally operate at the state level, according to Rachel K. Gillette, who is chair of the cannabis law group at Greenspoon Marder LLP.