Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2020

What Are My Chances of Being Audited by the IRS ?

As IRS budgets and audit staff continue to diminish, audit numbers are at an all-time low. But when you file your clients’ returns, the most common question persists: “How likely am I to be audited?”

Taxpayers whose returns stray far away from the norm or have “large, unusual or questionable items” can always be singled out for audit. But overall, as the statistics bear out, the IRS likes to audit taxpayers with certain characteristics.

To start, individuals get more audits than business and specialty taxpayers. In 2017, the IRS reported a 1 in 184 (0.542 percent) chance of being audited for all taxpayers. For taxpayers filing individual returns, the likelihood of audit is 1 in 161 (0.623 percent). Corporations (1120, 1120-S) and partnerships are audited less than individuals – with an audit rate of 1 in 224 (0.445 percent). In 2017, the IRS audited only 1 in every 568 (0.176 percent) employment tax returns (Forms 940/941).

Individual return audit rates Out of the 150 million taxpayers who filed in 2017, here are the IRS statistics on who experienced an audit:

Form 1040 taxpayer types, in descending likelihood of audit

Returns audited

International taxpayers

1 in 19

Taxpayers with gross income before deductions of over $1 million

1 in 23

Sole proprietors with gross income before deductions between $100,000 and $200,000

1 in 48

Sole proprietors with gross income before deductions between $200,000 and $1 million

1 in 64

Taxpayers with self-employment income under $25,000 who claim the EITC

1 in 72

OVERALL INDIVIDUAL AUDIT RATE

1 in 161

Farmers

1 in 228

Wage earners who make under $200,000 and don’t claim the EITC (65% of taxpayers fit this category)

1 in 364

The IRS is focusing its audit resources on areas where it knows taxpayers are traditionally non compliant: small businesses, international taxpayers, high-wealth taxpayers, and possible Earned Income Tax Credit fraud schemes. Traditional wage earners who have traceable income reported on Forms W-2 face much less scrutiny.

Business and specialty tax return audit rates Out of the millions of returns filed by businesses, employers, and specialty taxpayers (estate, gift, trust returns), here are the IRS statistics on who experienced an IRS audit:

Business/specialty taxpayer types, in descending likelihood of audit

Returns audited

Large corporations (Form 1120, assets greater than $5 billion)

1 in 3

Estate tax returns

1 in 12

Large corporations (Form 1120, assets between $10 million and $5 billion)

1 in 23

Excise tax returns

1 in 72

Gift tax returns

1 in 130

Small corporations (Forms 1120, not 1120-S)

1 in 146

OVERALL CORP/PARTNERSHIP AUDIT RATE

1 in 224

Partnership returns (Form 1065)

1 in 260

Estate and trust income tax returns (Forms 1041)

1 in 971

Employment tax returns (Forms 940 and 941)

1 in 568

S corporation returns (Forms 1120-S)

1 in 358

The IRS questions more returns through automated matching notices Audits are not the only way the IRS can question the accuracy of a tax return. Over the past 20 years, the IRS has ramped up more automated return checks in the form of matching programs. For example, in the IRS CP2000 program – the automated underreporter program – the IRS matches income between tax returns and IRS information to look for discrepancies. If there’s a mismatch, the IRS automatically sends out a notice asking for explanation. This program has increased 143 percent since 2000 – and it outnumbered audits 3.1 to 1 in 2017.

Clearly, smaller IRS budgets and personnel over the past seven years have even lowered the number of CP2000 matching notices. But automated notices have become the norm. And although CP2000 notices are not technically IRS audits, they allow the IRS to increase its ability to challenge returns far beyond what it can do through people-intensive audits. Matching notices also feel a lot like an audit for taxpayers. If you add the CP2000 matching program to the IRS “return challenge” rate for individuals, the chances of the IRS challenging an individual taxpayer’s return come out to 1 in 35 instead of 1 in 161.

The cost of an audit can be high Audits are likely to be costly. IRS data shows that over 90 percent of individual audits result in a tax change. The average additional tax owed is $6,014 for a mail audit and $21,918 for a more intrusive IRS field audit. CP2000s can also be costly. The IRS collected $6.7 billion in additional tax on the 3,295,000 matching notices it sent in 2017 – an average of $2,033 per notice issued.

On top of the additional tax for audits and under reporter notices, there are accuracy penalties, which can add 20 percent to the tax bill. Since 2005, the IRS has increased accuracy penalty assessments by 854 percent -- with more than 557,000 taxpayers getting an additional 20 percent penalty on their audit or CP2000 notice.

Do a proactive income review For some taxpayers, like international taxpayers and higher-wealth taxpayers, avoiding an IRS audit can be more difficult because the IRS believes that their returns are more likely to have errors and omissions.

For most taxpayers, avoiding IRS scrutiny means reporting all wage and income documents (Forms W-2, 1099, etc.) to the IRS. Tax pros can’t get IRS information statements from the IRS before the end of filing season, so they need to rely on their client’s ability to provide them all the information.

Tax pros can do their best tax season due diligence by looking at last year’s return and IRS wage and income transcripts for sources of income. They can also do a post-filing review by obtaining their client’s current-year wage and income transcripts that are available during the summer, before the IRS issues the first CP2000 notices later in November. 

This post-filing review is still proactive before the IRS issues any notices. If tax pros find unreported income, they can file an amended return to avoid any potential accuracy penalty that could be associated with a notice or audit. Clients who don’t avoid an audit or CP2000 notice will look to tax professionals for help. 

This is when tax professionals, especially experienced Tax Attorneys, can show their ultimate value to clients, by helping Fearlessly representing them before the IRS and penalty abatement request.

Have a Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


Source: 

AccountingTODAY

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Crypto 'Staking' May Generate ‘Rental’ Income

In things are continuously changing with cryptocurrency including the creation of Proof of Stake (PoS), which is a relatively new concept that has steadily been gaining popularity in the crypto community as a better alternative to Proof of Work(PoW) system on which the most popular cryptocurrency, bitcoin, operates. 

But what Is Staking? Before we consider the tax implications of staking, let’s discuss what staking is. Staking is very similar to having an interest bearing bank savings account. Dash, Neo, OKcash, Tezos (XTZ) are some cryptocurrencies you can stake. You can leave these coins in your wallet and/or an exchange that supports staking, and receive periodic payouts based on the amount of funds you stake. The above snippet shows how staking rewards appear on a dashboard of a major US crypto exchange. 
Staking rewards are taxable. However, the exact tax treatment for staking rewards isn’t as clear as one would think. Here is why. 
Taxed as Interest Income? 

Staking rewards resemble interest income, in that the process is quite similar to depositing funds into a bank account and receiving interest based on an annual interest rate. If you apply this theory, staking rewards may look similar to interest income. Interest income is generally reported on IRS Form Schedule B Part I. However, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) defines “interest income” to see if staking rewards are actually interest income for tax purposes. According to Reg §1.61-7, “Interest income includes interest on savings or other bank deposits; interest on coupon bonds; interest on an open account, a promissory note, a mortgage, or a corporate bond or debenture; the interest portion of a condemnation award; usurious interest (unless by State law it is automatically converted to a payment on the principal); interest on legacies; interest on life insurance proceeds held under an agreement to pay interest thereon; and interest on refunds of Federal taxes”. 

Clearly this definition of “interest income” does not have anything that describes income derived from staking cryptocurrencies. Additionally, per Deputy v. Du Pont, 308 U.S. 488 (1940), “Interest in its usual import is the amount which one has contracted to pay for the use of borrowed money. In the business world, interest in indebtedness means compensation for the use or forbearance of money”. Now, the key here is that the interest is derived from having money as principal. Coins you stake are not treated as “money” for tax purposes. 
According to Notice 2014-21, cryptocurrencies are treated as property. Therefore, it could be argued that staking rewards are not interest income for tax purposes although it may share many characteristics of interest income in the real world. If staking rewards are not interest income, how should it be treated for tax purposes? 
Taxed as Rental Income? 

According to Reg § 1.61-8, “gross income includes rentals received or accrued for the occupancy of real estate or the use of personal property”. Personal property is any property that is not real property like land and building. According to Notice 2014- 21, virtual currencies are treated as property, and all general rules applicable to property are applicable to virtual currencies. 

If we view crypto currencies you are staking as “property”, you could easily argue that you are renting a property and receiving rental income. Income received from renting an asset or property is not clearly interest income. If this is the case, staking rewards could constitute rental income and may also be subject to passive/nonpassive income categories depending on your level of participation in the staking. Rental income is typically reported on Schedule E of Form 1040. 
One thing to keep in mind is that, all communications issued by the IRS related to cryptocurrency taxation have been “general guidance” (Notice2014-21, 45 FAQs & Rev.Rul. 2019-24). These should not be viewed as the tax law. The guidance describes how the IRS believes existing tax laws are applied to crypto transactions. They are intended to help taxpayers with tax filings and improve compliance. Since these guidance are not law, in the court of law, you may argue against certain positions taken by the IRS. 
In the absence of clear laws, it is extremely important that you treat staking income consistently every tax year, until clear guidance are issued. Clearly, staking income is taxable and you should definitely report that on your taxes irrespective of the interest income vs. rental income argument. It’s also a good practice to use Form 8275 when you take controversial tax positions on your return. 
Also remember that if you receive staking rewards, make sure you check “yes” for the crypto question on Schedule 1. 

Have a Crypto Currency Staking Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A. 
 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com 
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid

Sources:

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Says That the Tax Filing and Payment Deadline of July 15 Will NOT Be Postponed!


The Department of the Treasury and IRS on June 29, 2020 announced in IR-2020-134 that the tax filing and payment deadline of July 15 will not be postponed. Individual taxpayers unable to meet the July 15 due date can request an automatic extension of time to file until Oct. 15.

Due to COVID-19, the original filing deadline and tax payment due date for 2019 was postponed from April 15 to July 15.

The IRS Reminds Taxpayers Filing Form 1040 That They Must File Form 4868 By July 15 To Obtain The Automatic Extension To Oct. 15 and The Extension Provides Additional Time To File The Tax Return – It Is Not An Extension To Pay Any Taxes Due.

The IRS urges people who owe taxes, even if they have a filing extension, to carefully review their situation and pay what they can by July 15 to avoid penalties and interest. 

Taxpayers can also get an extension by paying all or part of their tax due and indicate that the payment is for an extension using Direct Pay, the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), or a credit or debit card

When Getting An Extension By Making A Payment, Taxpayers Do Not Have To File A Separate Extension Form And Will Receive A Confirmation Number For Their Records.

Payment options

Taxpayers who owe taxes can choose from the following payment options:

The IRS recommends that taxpayers who are unable to pay their taxes in full should act as quickly as possible. Tax bills can quickly accumulate more interest and penalties the longer they sit. The usual penalty rate of 0.5% per month is reduced to 0.25% For the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2020, the interest rate for underpayment is 3%.

Most taxpayers who cannot pay in full have the following payment options:

  • Installment Agreement — Taxpayers who do not qualify to use the online payment agreement option, or choose not to use it, can also apply for a payment plan. 
  • Temporarily Non-Collectible — You can contact the IRS to request a temporary delay of the collection process. If the IRS determines a taxpayer is unable to pay, it may delay collection until the taxpayer's financial condition improves. Penalties and interest continue to accrue until the full amount is paid.
  • Offer in Compromise — Certain taxpayers qualify to settle their tax bill for less than the amount they owe by submitting an offer in compromise. 
Taxpayers Should File, Even If They Can’t Pay The Full Amount Due. 

By properly filing this form, a taxpayer will avoid the late-filing penalty, normally five percent per month based on the unpaid balance, that applies to returns filed after the deadline. In addition, any payment made with an extension request will reduce or eliminate interest and late-payment penalties that apply to payments made after April 15. The current interest rate is three percent per year, compounded daily, and the late-payment penalty is normally 0.5 percent per month.

Taxpayers who have finished their returns should file by the regular July 15 deadline, even if they can’t pay the full amount due. In many cases, those struggling with unpaid taxes qualify for one of several relief programs, including the following:

  • Most people can set up a payment agreement with the IRS. Those who owe $50,000 or less in combined tax, penalties and interest can use the Streamlined Procedure to set up a monthly payment agreement for up to 72 months. Taxpayers can choose this option even if they have not yet received a bill or notice from the IRS. 
  • Some struggling taxpayers may qualify for an Offer in Compromise  This is an agreement between a taxpayer and the IRS that settles the taxpayer’s tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. The IRS looks at the taxpayer’s income and assets to make a determination regarding the taxpayer’s ability to pay. 
Can't Pay Your Taxes?

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
  
 
for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid

Read more at: Tax Times blog

More Employers Gets Criminally Prosecuting For Failure To Pay Withheld Payroll Taxes!

On October 29, 2019 we posted The IRS is Now Criminally Prosecuting Employers For FailureTo Pay Withheld Payroll Taxes! where we discussed that the IRS is stepping up criminally prosecuting business owners for failing to turn over withheld payroll taxes, on June 4, 2020  we posted Another Employer Gets Criminally Prosecuting For Failure To Pay Withheld Payroll Taxes! and now according to the DoJ, a Greensboro, North Carolina, business owner was sentenced to 18 months in prison for failing to pay employment taxes.


According to documents and information provided to the court, Elizabeth Wood, 40, and her mother Rebecca Adams, 57, operated a temporary staffing businesses in Greensboro under the names A & R Staffing Solutions, Inc., Wood Executive Services Inc., and Adams Staffing Enterprises Inc. 

Wood and her mother withheld federal and state taxes from employees’ paychecks but did not pay those taxes over to the IRS or the State of North Carolina. 

In 2015, Wood pleaded guilty to embezzling employee state tax withholdings and was sentenced to prison. 

After Her Release, Wood Resumed Her Role At The Staffing Business Where She Continued To Withhold Federal Taxes
From Employees’ Paychecks, But Again Did Not Pay Those Taxes Over To The IRS. (Really?)



She Also Did Not File With The IRS The Required Quarterly Payroll Tax Return.

On Feb. 5, 2020, Wood and her mother, Adams, pleaded guilty to failing to pay over employment taxes. Adams is scheduled to be sentenced on July 9, 2020. In addition to the term of imprisonment, U.S. Senior District Judge N. Carlton Tilley Jr., ordered Wood to serve three years of supervised release and to pay approximately $2,338,766 in restitution to the United States.

 
Thinking of Borrowing From Your Company's
Payroll Tax Withholdings?

You Better Thank Again, if You Like Your Freedom!


Have Payroll Tax Problems?
 
 
 Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.  

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:
orToll Free at 888-8TaxAid
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help