Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2020

Manufacturing in Mexico by Luxembourg CFC is Subpart F Income

The Tax Court has held in Whirlpool Financial Corporation, (2020) 154 TC No. 9, that a domestic manufacturer/distributor corporation had to include in income, as Subpart F foreign base company sale income (FBCSI), amounts earned by its Luxembourg controlled foreign corporation (CFC) from appliances manufactured in the CFC’s Mexican branch and sold to the domestic corporation.
U.S. shareholders of a foreign corporation are not subject to U.S. taxation on the income of the foreign corporation until an actual dividend is remitted by the foreign corporation to the U.S. shareholders. However, the U.S. shareholders of a CFC (as defined in Code Sec. 957(a)) must generally include in gross income their pro rata share of the CFC's subpart F income as a deemed dividend inclusion. (Code Sec. 951)
One category of subpart F income is foreign base company income. (Code Sec. 952) Foreign base company income includes FBCSI, among other things. (Code Sec. 954(a), Code Sec. 954(d))
For purposes of determining FBCSI in situations in which the carrying on of activities by a CFC through a branch or similar establishment outside the CFC's country of incorporation has substantially the same effect as if such branch or similar establishment were a wholly owned subsidiary corporation deriving such income, then, under regs, the income attributable to the carrying on of such activities of such branch or similar establishment is treated as income derived by a wholly owned subsidiary of the CFC and constitutes FBCSI of the CFC. (Code Sec. 954(d)(2))
Whirlpool was a domestic corporation that manufactured and distributed household appliances through domestic and foreign subsidiaries. The foreign subsidiaries were CFCs. In 2009, through a branch in Mexico (WIN), Whirlpool’s Luxembourg CFC acted as the nominal manufacturer of appliances in Mexico, using a structure that qualified for Mexican tax and trade incentives. Whirlpool Luxembourg sold these appliances to Whirlpool, which distributed the appliances for sale to consumers.
The Court concluded that the income earned by Whirlpool Luxembourg from its sales of WIN-manufactured products to Whirlpool was FBCSI because that income met the requirements in Code Sec. 954(d)(2).
The Court noted that Code Sec. 954(d)(2) establishes two preconditions for its application:
  1. The CFC must be carrying on activities “through a branch or similar establishment” outside its country of incorporation, and
  2. The conduct of activities in this manner must have “substantially the same effect” as if the branch were a wholly owned subsidiary of the CFC.
The Court said that the first precondition was "clearly met" here: Whirlpool Luxembourg was incorporated in Luxembourg, and it carried on its manufacturing activities “through a branch or similar establishment” in Mexico. 
The statute then requires that this mode of operation had “substantially the same effect” as if the Mexican branch were a wholly owned subsidiary of Whirlpool Luxembourg. The Court concluded that it did.
Luxembourg in 2009 employed a territorial system of taxation. Luxembourg exempted from current taxation income earned by a foreign branch of a Luxembourg corporation, provided that the branch constituted a permanent establishment (PE) of the Luxembourg corporation in that foreign country. Whirlpool Luxembourg represented to Luxembourg tax authorities that it had a PE in Mexico. And it received a ruling from them that it had a PE in Mexico and that all income earned from its sales to Whirlpool was attributable to that PE. Whirlpool Luxembourg thus paid no tax to Luxembourg on its sales income.
Under the Mexican tax regime, Mexico taxed WIN on the income it earned from supplying manufacturing services to Whirlpool Luxembourg. But Mexico treated Whirlpool Luxembourg as a “foreign principal” that was deemed, under Mexican law, to have no PE in Mexico. As a result, Whirlpool Luxembourg paid no tax to Mexico on its sales income. 
By carrying on its activities “through a branch or similar establishment” in Mexico, Whirlpool Luxembourg avoided any current taxation of its sales income. It thus achieved “substantially the same effect”—deferral of tax on its sales income—that it would have achieved under U.S. tax rules if its Mexican branch were a wholly owned non-CFC subsidiary deriving such income. The Court said, "That is precisely the situation that the statute covers."
Have an International Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)


Read more at: Tax Times blog

The IRS Relieves U.S. Persons Temporarily Doing Business Abroad due to COVID-19 Travel Disruptions.

In a Revenue Procedure 2020-30, 2020-22 IRB, the IRS has provided relief to U.S. persons that temporarily did business in foreign countries due to "COVID-19 Emergency Travel Disruptions." 

The global outbreak of the COVID-19 virus (the COVID-19 Emergency) has significantly limited the ability of many individuals to enter the U.S. Regardless of whether they are infected with the COVID-19 virus, individuals may have become severely restricted in their movements, including by order of government authorities. (COVID-19 Emergency Travel Disruptions). 
Form 8858, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Foreign Disregarded Entities and Foreign Branches (FBs), is filed by certain U.S. persons that directly or indirectly operate a “foreign branch.” (Form 8858, Instructions) 

Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, must be filed by certain U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs), or certain other interests in foreign corporations that are not CFCs. (Form 5471, Instructions) 

Generally, a foreign branch separate unit (FBSU) is a business operation outside the U.S. that, if carried on by a U.S. person, constitutes a foreign branch as defined in Reg §1.367(a)-6T(g)(1). (Reg §1.1503(d)-1(b)(4)(i)(A)) 
Form 8865, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Partnerships, must be filed by a U.S. person that controls a foreign partnership (controlled foreign partnership). (Reg § 1.6038-3(a)(2))  
Reg §1.989(a)-1(b)(2)(ii) generally provides that the foreign activities of a U.S. person are a qualified business unit (QBU) if those activities constitute a trade or business and a separate set of books and records is maintained with respect to those activities. QBUs are required to file Form 8858. (Form 8858, Instructions)
The IRS has provided relief to U.S. persons that temporarily did business in foreign countries due to COVID-19 Emergency Travel Disruptions. When determining whether a FBSU or a QBU has an obligation to file Form 8858, the IRS will not consider “temporary activities” in foreign countries that would not have been conducted there but for COVID-19 travel restrictions. 
Accordingly, temporary activities will not give rise to a U.S. person’s obligation to file (1) Form 8858, including an obligation to file a Form 8858 by attaching the Form 8858 to a Form 5471, with respect to a controlled foreign corporation, or (2) Form 8865 with respect to a controlled foreign partnership. (Rev Proc 2020-30, Sec. 3.01)
 Do You Have a Tax Problem ?
 

 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
 
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Addresses NOL Carrybacks for Taxpayers With Outstanding IRC § 965 Net Tax Liabilities

The IRS, on its website Frequently asked questions about net operating loss carrybacks and Sec. 965 inclusions, has provided frequently asked questions (FAQs) about net operating loss (NOL) carrybacks for taxpayers with outstanding IRC § 965 net tax liabilities.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act, PL 116-136) amended Code Sec. 172(b)(1) to allow a taxpayer with an NOL arising in a 2018, 2019, or 2020 tax year to carry back that loss to each of the 5 preceding years (carryback period). (Section 2303 of the CARES Act). 
Under Code Sec. 172(b)(3), taxpayers may elect not to carryback NOLs arising in a 2018, 2019 or 2020 tax year. 
Under Code Sec. 172(b)(1)(D)(v)(I), taxpayers may elect not to carryback an NOL to a tax year in which they have “section 965(a) inclusions.” 
Generally, Code Sec. 965(a) requires: (a) a deferred foreign income corporation (DFIC) to increase its income for its last tax year that begins before January 1, 2018 (section 965(a) inclusions), by the greater of the accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income of such corporation as of either November 2, 2017 or December 31, 2017; and (b) certain taxpayers to include in gross income their pro rata share of the increase in the income of the deferred foreign income corporation (Code Sec. 965 years). 
Under Code Sec. 965(c), a U.S. shareholder of a DFIC is allowed a statutorily defined deduction (section 965 deduction) for the tax year in which these rules apply. (Code Sec. 965(c)(1)) 
Code Sec. 965(h) allows a U.S. shareholder of a DFIC taxpayer to pay its "section 965 net tax liability" in installments (section 965(h) election). 
A U.S. shareholder's "section 965 net tax liability" is the excess of (1) the taxpayer's net income tax for the tax year in which an amount is included in the shareholder's gross income under Code Sec. 951(a)(1), over (2) the taxpayer's net income tax for such tax year determined without regard to any income or deduction properly attributable to a dividend received by such U.S. shareholder from any deferred foreign income corporation and without regard to Code Sec. 965(h).
Code Sec. 965(n) and Reg §1.965-7(e) allow a taxpayer to make an election to not take into account Code Sec. 965(a) inclusions when determining the taxpayer’s (1) NOL deduction under Code Sec. 172 for the tax year, or (2) taxable income for the tax year that may be reduced by NOL carryovers or carrybacks to the tax year under Code Sec. 172.
In Rev Proc 2020-24, 2020-17 IRB, the IRS provided procedures for taxpayers with NOLs arising in tax years beginning in a 2018, 2019 or 2020 tax year on how to (1) waive the 5-year carryback period, (2) elect to exclude section 965 years from the carryback period, and (3) apply to waive a carryback period, reduce a carryback period, or revoke an election to waive a carryback period for a tax year that began before January 1, 2018 and ended after December 31, 2017.
The IRS also issued temporary procedures, in the form of FAQs, for faxing certain Forms 1139, Corporation Application for a Tentative Refund, and 1045, Application for Tentative Refund (for Individuals, estates or trusts), to the IRS. In FAQ #5, the IRS indicated that it would issue additional instructions on filing requests for tentative refunds for taxpayers with outstanding section 965(h) net tax liabilities. See IRS temporarily allows fax filing of Form 1139 and Form 1045 and IRS adds to guidance on fax filing of Forms 1139 and 1045 refund claims (04/20/2020).
In FAQ #5 of the temporary procedures, the IRS has now answered frequently asked questions about NOL carrybacks for taxpayers with outstanding section 965(h) net tax liabilities. 
  • Q1. Taxpayer has an NOL arising in a tax year beginning in 2018, 2019, or 2020, and one or more of the tax years in the carryback period for that NOL is a section 965 year. May the taxpayer make an election either under Code Sec. 172(b)(3) to waive the entire carryback period (i.e. for both section 965 years and non-section 965 years) or under Code Sec. 172(b)(1)(D)(v)(I) to waive the carryback only for section 965 years?
  • A1. Yes. The taxpayer may file an election to either (1) waive the entire 5-year carryback period or (2) to exclude all section 965 years from the carryback period. Guidance regarding when and how to file these elections is provided in Rev Proc 2020-24, Sec. 4.01, and in Q&A 2 below.
  • Q2. Taxpayer has an NOL arising in a tax year beginning in 2018, 2019, or 2020, and also has one or more section 965 years in the carryback period, how does the taxpayer elect to exclude only the section 965 years from the carryback period?
  • A2. A taxpayer may make the election to exclude all section 965 years from the carryback period by attaching an election statement to the earliest filed of the following:
    • The Federal income tax return for the tax year in which the NOL arises;
    • A Form 1139 or Form 1045, as applicable, applying the NOL to a tax year in the carryback period, or 

    • An amended Federal income tax return applying the NOL to the earliest tax year in the carryback period that is not a section 965 year. 

  • This election statement must include the following: 
    • A statement that the taxpayer is electing to apply Code Sec. 172(b)(1)(D)(v)(I) under Rev Proc 2020-24; 

    • The tax year in which the NOL arose; and 

    • The taxpayer’s section 965 years. 

If a taxpayer claims a refund or credit as a result of the carryback of the NOL by filing amended Federal income tax returns for tax years in the carryback period, the taxpayer must also attach the election statement to each amended return. See Rev Proc 2020-24, Sec. 4.01(2). 
  • Q3. A taxpayer is carrying back an NOL to a section 965 year and is now entitled to a refund for that year because the income tax liability for that section 965 year (including all installment payments) is fully paid. May the taxpayer use Form 1139 or Form 1045, as applicable, to apply for a refund for the section 965 year? 
  • A3. Yes. Taxpayers can disregard the portion of the instructions for Forms 1139 and 1045 that prohibit taxpayers from using these forms to apply for refunds for section 965 years. However, under the CARES Act, Code Sec. 172(b)(1)(D)(iv) provides that a taxpayer who has a carryback to a section 965 year is deemed to have made a Code Sec. 965(n) election that limits the loss that can be carried back to each section 965 year. Because of this, an NOL can be carried back only to reduce income in excess of the amount of the section 965(a) inclusion net of the section 965(c) deduction.
  • Q4. A taxpayer files a Form 1139 or Form 1045 to request a refund resulting from a 5-year carryback of an NOL arising in a tax year beginning in 2018, 2019, or 2020, and the carryback period includes section 965 years, will the taxpayer receive the full carryback refund amount?
  • A4. For a taxpayer who has made a section 965(h) election, a refund will be generated only if the excess credit generated by the NOL deduction in the section 965 year exceeds the entire unpaid income tax liability for the section 965 year. 
  • Q5. Has the IRS extended the due date for filing Forms 1139 and 1045 to apply for a tentative refund based on the carryback of NOLs arising in tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and ending before June 30, 2019? 
  • A5. Yes. The IRS has granted a six-month extension of time for taxpayers to file Form 1139 or Form 1045, as applicable, to apply for a tentative refund from the carryback of an NOL that arose in a tax year that began during calendar year 2018 and that ended on or before June 30, 2019.
This extension of time is limited to requesting a tentative refund to carry back an NOL and does not extend the time to carry back any other item.
  • Q6. What is the due date for filing a Form 1139 or Form 1045 to request a tentative refund from the carryback of an NOL arising in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2018, and ending after December 31, 2017 (2017 fiscal tax year), and to make or revoke an election with respect to an NOL arising in a 2017 fiscal tax year?
  • A6. Taxpayers with an NOL arising in a 2017 fiscal tax year who make an application for a tentative refund on Form 1139 or Form 1045, as applicable, with respect to a carryback of such NOL will be treated as having timely filed if Form 1139 or 1045 with respect to such carryback is filed no later than July 27, 2020.
Similarly, elections for a 2017 fiscal tax year with an NOL to waive any carryback period, to reduce any carryback period, or to revoke any election made under Code Sec. 172(b) to waive any carryback period will be treated as timely filed if filed no later than July 27, 2020.
A taxpayer can file the above elections by attaching a statement containing the taxpayer's name, address, and taxpayer identification number, with "Filed pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2020-24" at the top, to Form 1045, or Form 1139. This statement must indicate the section under which the election is being made and set forth information to identify the election, the period for which it applies, and the taxpayer's basis and entitlement to make the election. See Rev Proc 2020-24, sec. 4.04(1). 
  • Q7. May a taxpayer with a farming business or insurance company that previously filed elections to forgo the carryback period for NOLs arising in tax years 2018 and 2019 revoke those elections and claim the 5-year carryback period with respect to such NOLs? 
  • A7. No. The CARES Act does not provide for an election to revoke prior elections to forgo the carryback period for NOLs arising in these years. A taxpayer may, however, revoke a prior election to relinquish the carryback period with respect to an NOL arising in a 2017 fiscal tax year. See Rev Proc 2020-24, sec. 4.04(1). 
  • Q8. What is the due date for filing an election to forgo the entire carryback period or forgo only section 965 years?
  • A8. A taxpayer must make an election either (1) to exclude section 965 years from the carryback period for an NOL arising in a tax year beginning in 2018 or 2019, or (2) to waive the carryback period for such an NOL, by the due date (including extensions) for filing its return for the first tax year ending after March 27, 2020. See Rev Proc 2020-24, sec. 4.01. 
For an NOL arising in a tax year beginning in 2020, these elections must be made by the due date (including extensions) for filing the Federal income tax return for that tax year. See Rev Proc 2020-24, sec. 4.01(2). 
Once made, both elections are irrevocable.
  • Q9. What supporting documentation is required to be attached to a request for refund resulting from the carryback of NOLs to section 965 years?
  • A9. The following documentation must be attached to a request for refund:
    • All supporting documentation for the NOL carryback as described in the Form 1139 or Form 1045 instructions. 

    • An amended Form 965-A or Form 965-B (as applicable) to record the amount of the change in the section 965 net tax liability, if any, caused by the NOL carryback. 

    • A statement of explanation to explain the change in the section 965 net tax liability. 
Additionally, Q&A13 of the temporary procedures provides procedures relating to missing information or IRS questions regarding your filing.
  • Q10. As a result of an NOL carryback to pre-section 965 years (2014, 2015 and 2016) and exclusion of 2017 (a section 965 year), there is a change in a foreign tax credit carryover or charitable contribution carryover (tax attributes) for 2017. This change reduces, but does not eliminate, the taxpayer’s section 965 net tax liability for 2017. Should the taxpayer file an amended return for 2017 to reflect this?
  • A10. Yes. If the taxpayer does not file an amended return, the IRS’s records will not reflect the change in either the total tax liability or the section 965(h) net tax liability for the section 965 year due to the change in tax attributes. Consequently, the taxpayer’s section 965(h) net tax liability and associated installment payments due in the future may not be accurately reflected in IRS systems. This, in turn, could lead to unintentional or erroneous accelerations of section 965(h) installment payments if the taxpayer does not pay the pre-change installment amounts, as well as potential interest and penalty charges, delays in refunds, or other processing complications.
Taxpayers should not use the temporary procedures reserved for submission of certain claims on Form 1139 or Form 1045 (see above) to fax an amended return as such faxed amended returns will not be processed.  
Want a Refund of Your 2017 IRC 965 Transition Tax?
 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.   

for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Revises Form 656-Booklet on “Offer in Compromise”

The 2020 revision of the Form 656-Booklet, Offer in Compromise (OIC) is now available for download on IRS.gov.

The booklet contains current forms and instructions for submitting an OIC, including the $205 OIC application fee.


Using previous versions of the booklet may result in delayed processing of OIC applications.

Use the OIC Pre-Qualifier Tool to confirm your client is eligible and to calculate a preliminary offer amount. 

Can't Pay Your Taxes?
 Contact the Tax Lawyers at 

Marini & Associates, P.A.   
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help