Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2020

AICPA Has Posted 20 FAQs on Taxpayer Relief During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The AICPAhas identified seven key areas in need of immediate tax relief and has posted
20 FAQs on the latest developments in taxpayer relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. The AICPA has been advocating for more comprehensive relief from Treasury and the IRS and also continues to urge the agencies to develop a contingency plan for the next phase of relief should that be needed.  

So far, the IRS has postponed until July 15 federal income tax returns and payments (including self-employment tax payments) due April 15, 2020, for 2019 tax years, and estimated income tax payments due April 15, 2020, for 2020 tax years. The IRS has expanded that postponement to include gift and generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes and returns. The AICPA has recommended that the IRS should expand relief to all types of returns and payments due between March 3 and July 15.

The AICPA’s FAQs discuss the need for relief regarding correspondence with the IRS, since taxpayers and their advisers may not timely receive or be able to respond to IRS communications and notices.

The FAQs also discuss the IRS’s recent change of policy regarding its acceptance of e-signatures on certain forms, and the lack of clarity around whether this applies to Form 8879, IRS e-file Signature Authorization.

Three of the FAQs cover estimated tax payments because April 15 estimated tax payments were postponed until July 15, but June 15 payments were not.

Other topics in the FAQs include extensions; fiscal-year entities; IRAs and retirement plans; gift and GST taxes; IRS closures; non-income–tax payments; information returns; relief for timely elections; tax-exempt organizations; and U.S. citizens residing abroad.

The AICPA has also developed a state filing relief chart to track state developments, guidance releases, and summaries.   
 
Have a Tax problem?
 
 

Need to Obtain IRS Relief during
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) Epidemic?
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
  

 
for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Another “Quiet” Disclosure Leads to Another Criminal Conviction

It is time for people to wake up and realize that “Quiet” Disclosures really don't make sense in light of the Streamline Voluntary Disclosure Program, which may not be available much longer.

According to DoJ, Lake Worth Businessman Pleads Guilty to Evading Taxes on Millions in Income, Stashing Funds in Secret Accounts Around the World.

 
 

He Tapped Hidden Accounts

To Buy $1.3 Million Yacht And Waterfront Property
and Filed a False “Quiet” Disclosure

A Lake Worth, Florida, businessman pleaded guilty today to tax evasion and willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank or Financial Account, announced Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida.

According to court documents and statements made in court, Dusko Bruer owned and operated a company that bought U.S.-made agricultural machinery and parts and sold them throughout the world. Beginning in 2003, the company did not pay Bruer a salary. Instead, Bruer used millions of dollars from the company’s bank accounts to pay his personal expenses, make investments abroad, and make transfers to an employee and his family.


From 2007 through 2011, Bruer transferred over $5.8 million of the company’s profits to foreign financial accounts. Bruer used the company’s profits to buy a yacht, purchase a waterfront home for his girlfriend and himself, purchase a home for an employee, and buy real property in Serbia. Between 2007 and 2014, Bruer failed to report more than $7.7 million in income and did not pay taxes of more than $2.7 million that were due to the United States.

Although Bruer’s company had a number of employees and reaped millions of dollars in profits, Bruer never filed a corporate tax return for the company nor did the company ever pay taxes on its income. Bruer also never filed employment tax returns during those years reporting wages that the company paid to its employees nor did the company withhold and pay over payroll taxes. From 2007 through 2015, Bruer maintained financial accounts in Croatia, Germany, Serbia, and Switzerland. He did not report his ownership of the accounts to the Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) by filing a Report of Foreign Bank or Financial Account (FBAR), despite knowing he had an obligation to do so. In 2010, an account he held at a subsidiary of Credit Suisse AG in Zurich, Switzerland reached a year-end high value of $6,177,586. Bruer used the assets in his foreign accounts for personal use, including the purchase of a yacht for $1,350,000 and a 3,200 square foot home in Lake Worth, Florida, with 100 feet of waterfront frontage for approximately $1,650,000.

From 1999 to 2014, Bruer never filed a personal tax return nor did he pay tax on his income. In 2015, Credit Suisse closed his account in Switzerland and advised him to enter the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), by which taxpayers could avoid criminal prosecution by making a voluntary disclosure directly to IRS-Criminal Investigation, filing six years of delinquent or amended income tax returns, as well as delinquent or amended FBARs, paying back taxes, interest, and certain penalties on the six tax years in the disclosure period, and paying a penalty on the highest aggregate account balance of their noncompliant offshore assets.

Bruer Did Not Enter Into The OVDP Because He
Determined That The Cost Would Be Too High?
(Really?#*)
Do You Value Your Freedom? 

Instead, Bruer made a “quiet” disclosure that involved filing several delinquent tax returns with the IRS, not flagging the returns in anyway or paying the taxes, penalties and interest that would be paid in OVDP.

The Returns Bruer Filed As Part of His “Quiet” Disclosure Were False Because They Disclosed Only The Funds He Held In The Credit Suisse Account and Not The Funds He Held In The Accounts In Croatia, Germany, Serbia, Nor Did They Report The Income He Earned From His Company.

United States District Court Judge Senior District Judge Kenneth A. Marra scheduled sentencing for June 12, 2020. Bruer faces:

  • a maximum sentence of five (5) years in prison for each charge,
  • three years (3) of supervised release,
  • restitution, and
  • monetary penalties.
 As you can see, the "Quiet" Disclosure really work well for this taxpayer - NOT!
 
Do You Have Undeclared  Offshore Income?
Is Your Name Being Handed Over to the IRS?
  
Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You? 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Answers Questions On Installment Agreement Direct Debit Payments

Following its March 25 announcement of the COVID-19-related suspension of payments due between April 1 and July 15, 2020 by taxpayers who have an agreement with IRS to pay taxes in installments, IRS has answered questions about situations in which those taxpayers have Direct Debit Installment Agreements (DDIAs).

A DDIA is an arrangement to pay federal taxes under an installment agreement via payments that are automatically debited from the taxpayer's bank account. 
On March 25, 2020, IRS issued IR 2020-59, which provided the following: For taxpayers under an existing installment agreement, payments due between April 1 and July 15, 2020 are suspended. Taxpayers who are currently unable to comply with the terms of an Installment Payment Agreement, including a Direct Debit installment agreement, may suspend payments during this period if they prefer. Furthermore, IRS will not default any installment agreements during this period. By law, interest will continue to accrue on any unpaid balances.
IRS has now posted two questions and answers regarding taxpayers with DDIAs:

Q. Will direct debit payments continue to be deducted from my bank for Direct Debit Installment Agreements (DDIAs) during the suspension period?

A. Yes. IRS will continue to debit payments from the bank for Direct Debit Installment Agreements (DDIAs) during the suspension period. However, taxpayers who are unable to comply with terms of their Installment Agreement may suspend payments during this period. Installment agreements will not default due to missing payments during the suspension period through July 15.

Q. If necessary, what is the best way to suspend direct debit payments for a Direct Debit Installment Agreement (DDIA)?

A. Taxpayers should contact their bank directly to stop payments if they prefer to suspend direct debit payments during the suspension period. Banks are required to comply with customer requests to stop recurring payments within a specified timeframe. IRS may be able to suspend certain single DDIA payments upon request, but due to disruptions caused by COVID-19 issues it may be difficult to reach an assistor. Note that if payments are stopped, in order to avoid possible default of the agreement once the suspension period expires on July 15, 2020, taxpayers must inform their bank to allow the debits to resume at least two weeks before their next payment is due.
Have an IRS Tax Collection Problem?

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 
for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)  


Read more at: Tax Times blog

OECD Says Tax Treaty Rules Likely Cover COVID-19 Telework

According to Law360, people working in countries other than their usual ones because of the coronavirus pandemic aren't likely to trigger new taxation requirements for employers under global treaty rules, according to guidance issued Friday by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

In general, workers who are temporarily based in a different country because of cross-border travel restrictions related to the outbreak probably won't incur new tax obligations under international tax treaty rules, according to the guidance. The OECD noted that travel restrictions are among the unprecedented measures governments have taken in response to the global spread of the virus, which causes the respiratory disease COVID-19.

A company's taxable presence in a jurisdiction, its permanent establishment or PE, is determined based on the tax treaty between its home country and the jurisdiction in question. Some businesses may be concerned that employees who are stranded in countries where they don't normally work could create a permanent establishment there, but companies probably won't have to worry based on treaty rules, according to the guidance.

“The Exceptional and Temporary Change of the Location Where Employees Exercise Their Employment Because of the COVID-19 Crisis, Such As Working From Home, Should Not Create New PEs For The Employer,”
According To The OECD.
 


For employees working from home, the guidance cited the OECD's Model Tax Convention, which is meant for countries to use when they write tax treaties. The OECD Model explains that even though part of a company's business may be conducted out of an employee's home office, “that should not lead to the conclusion that that location is at the disposal of that enterprise.”

Teleworking from home because of the COVID-19 crisis wouldn't create a permanent establishment because such activity lacks a sufficient degree of permanency or because the company has no control over that home office, except through that one employee, according to the guidance.  

However, the guidance noted that thresholds for tax registration under domestic law may be lower than those under a tax treaty and may therefore trigger corporate income tax filing requirements. Accordingly, the OECD encouraged tax administrations to provide guidance on domestic law threshold requirements in the context of the COVID-19 crisis.

Some countries have already started issuing guidelines. The Australian Taxation Office recently published guidance that said it will “not apply compliance resources” to determine if a company has a permanent establishment in the country if the business has employees there only because of travel restrictions related to the pandemic.

Employees who are working in a different country from their usual also aren't likely to create a new individual tax residence under global treaty rules, according to the OECD guidance. A new tax residence could change where that person's income is taxed, but under a situation like the current pandemic, treaty residence is likely to remain in the home country, according to the guidance.

“Despite the complexity of the rules, and their application to a wide range of potentially affected individuals, it is unlikely that the COVID-19 situation will affect the treaty residence position,” according to the guidance.

Countries have started issuing guidance on the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the tax residency statuses of individuals who have been forced to relocate. Last month, the U.K. government relaxed its tax residency rules amid the pandemic. Australia also published guidance stating that people won't be considered residents of the country for tax purposes if they're temporarily there because of COVID-19.

Have an International Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)  

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help