Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: February 2021

Maryland Now The First To Tax Big Tech’s Ad Revenue

According to The New York Times, State politicians, struggling with yawning budget gaps from the pandemic, have made no secret about their interest in getting a bigger piece of the tech industry’s riches.

Now, Maryland’s lawmakers are taking a new slice, with the nation’s first tax on the revenue from digital advertisements sold by companies like Facebook, Google and Amazon.

The State Senate voted on February 12, 2021 to override the governor’s veto of the measure, following in the footsteps of the state’s House of Delegates, which gave its approval on Thursday. The tax will generate as much as an estimated $250 million in the first year after enactment, with the money going to schools.

The Approval Signals The Arrival In The United States Of a Policy Pioneered By European Countries, and It Is Likely To Set Off A Fierce Legal Fight Over How Far Communities Can Go To Tax The Tech Companies.

Other states are pursuing similar efforts. Lawmakers in Connecticut and Indiana, for example, have already introduced bills to tax the social media giants. Several other states, like West Virginia and New York, fell short of passing new taxes on the tech giants last year, but their proponents may renew their push after Maryland’s success.

The moves are part of an escalating debate about the economic power of the tech giants. In the United States, law enforcement agencies brought multiple antitrust cases against Google and Facebook last year. Members of Congress have proposed laws to check their market power, encourage them to moderate speech more carefully and protect their users’ privacy.

Maryland’s tax also reflects the collision of two economic trends during the pandemic: 

  1. The largest tech companies have had milestone financial performances as social distancing moved work, play and commerce further online. 
  2. But cities and states saw their tax revenues plummet as the need for their social services grew.

“They’re really getting squeezed,” said Ruth Mason, a professor at the University of Virginia’s law school. “And this is a huge way to target a tax to the winners of the pandemic.”

The Maryland Tax, Which Applies To Revenue From Digital Ads That Are Displayed Inside The State,
Is Based On The Ad Sales A Company Generates.

A company that makes at least $100 million a year in global revenue but no more than $1 billion a year will face a 2.5 percent tax on its ads. Companies that make more than $15 billion a year will pay a 10 percent tax. Facebook’s and Google’s global revenues far exceed $15 billion.

While some states apply a sales tax to some digital goods and services when they are bought by customers, the Maryland tax is the first to be applied solely to the revenue a company got from digital advertising in the United States, experts said. The state’s lawmakers are expected to approve a second bill in the coming days making clear that the tax does not apply to media companies and that the cost cannot be directly passed along to businesses that buy ads, although critics say the tax will still lead to higher prices for ads.

European policymakers have turned to digital taxes in recent years as part of a larger regulatory push against the American tech giants. France has imposed a 3 percent tax on some digital revenue. Austria taxes income from digital advertising at 5 percent. The European efforts were condemned by the Trump administration, which threatened to impose tariffs on French goods over the issue.

Opponents may argue that because the largest tech companies are not based in Maryland, the law will tax activity that originated outside the state, violating the Constitution. They may also argue that the law runs afoul of a federal law that says taxes on digital goods or services must also apply to equivalent physical products.

But the law’s backers said they believed they were on solid ground to start taxing the giants.

Have an IRS or State Tax Problem?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

LB&I Adds 2 & Removes 4 Compliance Campaigns Resulting in 58 Active Tax Audit Campaigns

 

On September 25, 2020, we posted LB&I Adds Four Compliance Campaigns To 57 Active Campaign List, where we discussed that the IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) division has added four new compliance campaigns to its active campaigns list of 57 campaigns in total.

Now on its Active Campaigns website, the IRS Large Business and International Division (LB&I) has added two new compliance campaigns to its list of active campaigns and has removed four from that list, bring its list to 58 campaigns.

In January 2017, the IRS announced a new audit strategy for its Large Business and International Division (LB&I) known as " compliance campaigns." With the compliance campaigns, LB&I essentially shifted to examinations based on compliance issues that LB&I determined presented greater levels of compliance risk, thereby improving return selection. 

The LB&I, on its Active Campaigns website, has added the following two new campaigns to its active campaigns list:

  1. Puerto Rico Act 22, Individual Investors Act. This campaign addresses taxpayers who have claimed benefits through Puerto Rico Act 22, “Act to Promote the Relocation of Individual Investors to Puerto Rico,” without meeting the requirements of Code Sec. 937 (i.e., without being bona fide residents of Puerto Rico). As a result, these individuals may be excluding income subject to U.S. tax on a filed U.S. income tax return or failing to file and report income subject to U.S. tax.

        This campaign will also address those individuals who have met the requirements of Code Sec.                 937 but who may be erroneously reporting U.S. source income as Puerto Rico source income to             avoid U.S. tax. This campaign will address noncompliance in this area through examinations,                 outreach, and "soft letters." 

 

     2. Taxable asset transactions - matching buyers and sellers. Parties that participate in certain                     taxable asset transactions must report those transactions on either Form 8594 or Form 8883,                     which must be attached to their tax return. This campaign addresses business entities under the                 jurisdiction of LB&I that either (1) did not report a transaction on Form 8594 or Form 8883, or                 (2) reported the transaction in a manner inconsistent with the other party’s reporting of the                     transaction.

The Active Campaigns website doesn't say how LB&I will address noncompliance in this area. 

LB&I has removed the following campaigns from its “Active Campaigns” website:

  1. Basket transactions. This campaign addressed structured financial transactions where the taxpayer treats an option or other derivative as open until a barrier event occurs and, therefore, does not recognize or report current period gains. The gains are deferred until the contract terminates; at which time the overall net gain is reported as a long-term capital gain. LB&I used issue-based examinations, "soft letters" to material advisors, and practitioner outreach to address noncompliance during this campaign.
  2. Interest capitalization for self-constructed assets. When a taxpayer engages in certain production activities, they are required to capitalize interest expense under Code Sec. 263A. Interest capitalization applies to interest a taxpayer pays or incurs during the production period when producing property that meets the definition of designated property. The goal of this campaign was to ensure taxpayer compliance by verifying that interest is properly capitalized for designated property and the computation to capitalize that interest was accurate. LB&I used issue-based examinations, education soft letters, and educating taxpayers and practitioners to encourage voluntary compliance during this campaign.
  3. Partnership stop filer.  Partners report income, losses, and other items passed through from their partnership. Some partnerships stop filing tax returns for various reasons yet still have economic transactions that are not being reported to their partners. That activity is likely not being reported by the partners. LB&I used issue-based examinations, soft letters encouraging voluntary self-correction, and stakeholder outreach to address noncompliance during this campaign.
  4. Related-party transaction campaign. This campaign focused on transactions between commonly controlled entities that provide taxpayers a means to transfer funds from the corporation to related passthrough entities or shareholders. LB&I used issue-based examinations to address noncompliance during this campaign.

As an IRS Tax Defense Law Firm, outside of:

  1. Form3520/3520-A Compliance and Penalties,
  2. Micro-Captive Insurance Campaign,
  3. Post OVDP Compliance
  4. Swiss Bank Program Campaign and
  5. Syndicated Conservation Easement Transactions
we have not seen nor heard of any action in the remaining 53 listed campaign areas?
Have an IRS Tax Problem?
 

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

 
for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Revises Virtual Currency Transaction List in Final 1040 Instructions.

The final version of the instructions to Forms 1040 and 1040-SR has revised the non-exhaustive list of transactions involving virtual currency by removing the purchase of virtual currency and the acquisition of a financial interest in virtual currency from the list. The list is used by taxpayers to determine how they answer the question on Form 1040 and 1040-SR on whether they have received, sold, sent, exchanged, or otherwise acquired any financial interest in virtual currency during the year.

For the 2020 tax year, a taxpayer will need to answer the question on page 1 of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or 1040-SR, U.S. Tax Return for Seniors, which asks, "At any time during 2020, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?" 

A draft version of the 1040 instructions released in December 2020 included a list of transactions involving virtual currency. The draft 1040 instructions read:

"A transaction involving virtual currency includes, but is not limited to:

  • The receipt or transfer of virtual currency for free (without providing any consideration), including from an airdrop or following a hard fork;

  • An exchange of virtual currency for goods or services;

  • A purchase or sale of virtual currency;

  • An exchange of virtual currency for other property, including for another virtual currency; and

  • An acquisition or disposition of a financial interest in virtual currency."

The final version of the 1040 instructions has revised the list of virtual currency transactions. The final 1040 instructions read:

"A transaction involving virtual currency includes, but is not limited to:

  • The receipt or transfer of virtual currency for free (without providing any consideration), including from an airdrop or hard fork;

  • An exchange of virtual currency for goods or services;

  • A sale of virtual currency;

  • An exchange of virtual currency for other property, including for another virtual currency; and

  • A disposition of a financial interest in virtual currency."

Thus, "a purchase of virtual currency" and "an acquisition of a financial interest in virtual currency" have been removed from the list.

The fact that these two things were removed from the list does not necessarily mean that they are therefore not virtual currency transactions. First, the list is not exhaustive since it "includes, but is not limited to" what is listed. Second, the question on the Form 1040 asks explicitly whether a taxpayer has received or acquired a financial interest in virtual currency. 

It would seem that, regardless of what is on the list in the instructions, if a taxpayer purchased virtual currency, or acquired a financial interest in virtual currency, then the taxpayer would be required to answer yes to the virtual currency question on the Forms.

Have as IRS Tax Problem?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Issues Urgent EFIN Scam Alert to Tax Professionals

The Internal Revenue Service, state tax agencies and tax industry today warned tax professionals of a new scam email that impersonates the IRS and attempts to steal Electronic Filing Identification Numbers (EFINs).

The latest scam email says it is from “IRS Tax E-Filing” and carries the subject line “Verifying your EFIN before e-filing.”

The IRS warns tax pros not to take any of the steps outlined in the email, especially responding to the email. The body of the bogus email states:

    In order to help protect both you and your clients from unauthorized/fraudulent activities, the IRS     requires that you verify all authorized e-file originators prior to transmitting returns through our        system. That means we need your EFIN (e-file identification number) verification and Driver's            license before you e-file.

    Please have a current PDF copy or image of your EFIN acceptance letter (5880C Letter dated            within the last 12 months) or a copy of your IRS EFIN Application Summary, found at your e-           Services account at IRS.gov, and Front and Back of Driver's License emailed in order to complete     the verification process. Email: (fake email address)

    If your EFIN is not verified by our system, your ability to e-file will be disabled until you provide        documentation showing your credentials are in good standing to e-file with the IRS.
 
    © 2021 EFILE. All rights reserved. Trademarks
    2800 E. Commerce Center Place, Tucson, AZ 85706

Tax professionals who received the scam should save the email as a file and then send it as an attachment to [email protected]. They also should notify the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at www.TIGTA.gov to report the IRS impersonation scam. Both TIGTA and the IRS Criminal Investigation division are aware of the scam.

Like all phishing email scams, it attempts to bait the receiver to take action (opening a link or attachment) with a consequence for failing to do so (disabling the account). The links or attachment may be set up to steal information or to download malware onto the tax professional’s computer.

In this case, the tax preparers are being asked to email documents that would disclose their identities and EFINs to the thieves. The thieves can use this information to file fraudulent returns by impersonating the tax professional.

The attachment may contain malware that allows the thief to track keystrokes and eventually steal all passwords or take over control of the computer systems.
  
For additional information and help, tax professionals should review Publication 4557, Safeguarding Taxpayer Data, and Identity Theft Information for Tax Professionals

Have as IRS Tax Problem?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help