Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2022

Courts Confirm IRS Ability to Revoke or Not Renew Passports for Taxpayers with Serious Delinquent Debt

According to Law360, Federal courts have upheld the U.S. government's ability to deny or revoke a citizen's passport over a certified tax debt in what some tax advisers have considered a draconian enforcement mechanism: prohibiting international travel to collect unpaid taxes.

Courts over the past year have uniformly rejected challenges to Internal Revenue Code Section 7345, passed in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act of 2015, which effectively allows the Internal Revenue Service to deny citizens with delinquent taxes of more than $50,000 the right to travel outside the country. The IRS can certify a taxpayer's debt over that amount, indexed for inflation to $52,000, as "seriously delinquent" and transmit that determination to the State Department, which can choose then to revoke or deny a passport.

The statute gives taxpayers several avenues to negotiate with the IRS on a compromise or installment plan to pay the debt before it is certified and sent to the State Department. The IRS' website details the options taxpayers have to resolve certified tax debts, and it includes information on situations where a debt will not be certified, such as when a taxpayer is negotiating in good faith with the agency or is in bankruptcy.

Jerry August of Fox Rothschild LLP said that though there are ways to avoid the prohibition on travel, the law has left little room to raise a successful challenge in federal district courts or the U.S. Tax Court.

The Tax Court recently rejected a constitutional challenge to the program, saying in March that the law doesn't violate the Fifth Amendment. Robert Rowen's tax debt was properly certified by the IRS as seriously delinquent under Section 7345, Tax Court Judge Emin Toro said in the opinion. Rowen failed to pay federal income taxes for more than 20 years, accumulating a debt of nearly $500,000, the opinion said.

Although the State Department didn't take action to revoke Rowen's passport, he filed a petition in the Tax Court and asked the court to find the IRS' certification of his tax debt was erroneous, according to court documents.

Judge Toro said Section 7345 doesn't include any language that would prevent international travel in violation of the Fifth Amendment, as Rowen contested, and merely provides a process for the IRS to follow and transmit the certified tax debt to the State Department, which can determine whether to revoke or deny a passport.

A Georgia federal court also has found that Section 7345 doesn't violate the due process clause or other language in the Constitution. The U.S. government correctly denied Craig Thomas Jones' application to renew his passport over his tax debts, the court said in March.

When Jones tried to renew his passport in November 2019, the State Department said he was ineligible to do so because of the IRS' certification of his seriously delinquent tax debt, which stood at about $405,000, according to Jones' complaint.

Jones sued the government the next month. He argued in June 2020 that Section 7345 is unconstitutional because it violates an implied right.

U.S. District Judge J. Randal Hall disagreed. Section 7345 provides taxpayers with due process that satisfies requirements under the Fifth Amendment in the form of adequate notice by the IRS of their delinquency and the right to timely request a hearing, he said.

Jones' case is now pending before the Eleventh Circuit, where he has submitted his opening brief.

Taxpayers have so far had no more success in federal appeals courts, where they have argued the right to travel abroad as a U.S. citizen is a fundamental right protected by the Fifth Amendment.

Recently, a Tenth Circuit panel denied the appeal of a man who raised a constitutional challenge to the tax debt certification passport revocation process. However, a concurring opinion in the case offered some hope to challengers in suggesting a higher level of scrutiny should apply when a citizen's passport could be revoked.

U.S. Circuit Judge Carlos Lucero said a stricter standard of review may apply in cases that deal with the right to international travel, although the taxpayer in the case, Jeffrey T. Maehr, failed to raise that argument on appeal.

For U.S. taxpayers who have dual citizenship, the U.S.'s ability to revoke or deny passports can prove to be a nuisance even if they're living abroad.

Matthew Ledvina of Helm Advisors told Law360 that sometimes, traveling with a U.S. certified tax debt requires coordination between tax and immigration lawyers to make sure clients can prove their U.S. identity without a requisite passport and travel internationally. U.S. dual citizens can't hold themselves as foreign nationals, which can cause additional administrative burdens for clients with certified tax debts traveling back to the U.S., Ledvina said.

"I think when Congress passed this law, they never envisaged all these problems of people that are dual nationals," Ledvina said.


    If You Have Serious Delinquent IRS Debt, You Should Consult with Experienced Tax Attorneys, As There Are Several Ways Taxpayers Can Avoid Having the IRS Request That the State Department Revoke Your Passport. 
  Want To Keep Your US Passport?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

 

for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888)882-9243.



Read more at: Tax Times blog

Tighter Controls Over Beneficial Ownership Reporting in Panama

Panama has enacted Law 254, requiring international legal entities to provide their resident agent with accounting records annually. The Law adjusts existing legislation on anti-money laundering (AML) and aims to meet international standards on tax transparency. 

The Law is divided into three main areas, dealing with accounting records, due-diligence and registration of final beneficiaries.
 
Resident agents must obtain know-your-client information, including clients’ financial, transactional and risk profiles. They must also continuously monitor the business relationship with the client and check the clients’ declared activities. Beneficial owners must be checked against European Union, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and United Nations sanctions lists for AML purposes.
 
Legal entities will be obliged to keep a copy of the share certificates and shareholders' registry of the corporations. These must be retained for at least five years and made available on request to the Directorate General of Revenue of Panama.
 
The timeframe for the registration of ultimate beneficial owners of legal entities will be reduced. Changes to beneficial ownership data must be updated within 15 days of a change, instead of the previous 30 days.
 
A range of penalties will be enforced for resident agent non-compliance with any of the new measures and legal entities failing to register or update beneficial ownership information may be suspended from the Public Registry of Panama.

Have an International Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



Sources:
Arias Law (PDF)
Mata & Pitti
HG.org

Read more at: Tax Times blog

What Where The Most Litigated Issues In 2021?

Procedurally Taxing nicely summarized the National Taxpayer Advocate's new approach to calculating the most litigated issues in her annual report.  You can read about her approach starting on page 183 of the report.   

Instead of just looking at the tried cases, which she does capture, she also looks at the cases in which taxpayers filed a Tax Court petition.  It’s all in how you define litigation.  Is it best measured by the relatively small number of cases that get tried and receive an opinion, i.e., looking at the end of the case where about 1% of the filed cases end up, or by looking at the filed cases in which taxpayers started litigation but for a variety of reasons did not follow it to a conclusion by trial and opinion?  Since she gives you both sets of data, it’s hard to complain no matter which set of information you prefer.

Here are the charts, with the first one based on opinions issued and the second one on petitions filed:

Some things come out the same in either measure as the report states:

[Gross income disputes] was the number one issue among those litigated in the Tax Court with 66 substantive opinions issued. It was also the largest category of cases petitioned to the Tax Court. In FY 2021, taxpayers petitioned the Tax Court in 13,558 cases where gross income was an issue during the examination.

In the same vein, trade or business disputes came in second under both methods:

50 opinions where this category of issues was litigated in the Tax Court. Taxpayers petitioned the Tax Court in 2,255 instances where trade or business expenses were an issue during the examination in FY 2021.20 This category is high on our list as the second most prevalent category of opinions issued at the Tax Court and the second most petitioned issue in the Tax Court.

Have an IRS Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

What Happened in Collection During 2021?

Procedurally Taxing nicely summarized the National Taxpayer Advocate's annual report, which reported that collection due process notices and hearing requests continue to fall.  Some of the falloff in the most recent period is no doubt attributable to the pandemic, but the trend was set before Covid arrived.  Here is a graph displaying the trend:

The report gives more details and explanations for those interested.  It also included a chart on the number of family status cases petitioned to the Tax Court.  The number of Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) cases seems low when you read about the number of EITC audits.

This section of the report also contains an analysis of the number of non-Tax Court cases litigated during the past year.  Even more than the CDP filing chart above, a chart showing the number of lien cases referred to the Department of Justice shows a precipitous decline.  

Perhaps, the decline should come as no surprise given the decline in revenue officers over this period.  Without revenue officers to initiate these cases, there can be no referrals to DOJ.  

The number is getting close to approaching zero which is bad news for tax administration.  Again, of course, the pandemic plays a role, but the slide started before the pandemic arrived.

The decline in suits is more than matched by the decline in liens, levies and seizures.  The chart below shows the amazing decline in these activities.  This chart shows not only the recent drop off as a result of the pandemic but also the 10-year decline as the IRS’ resources were squeezed by Congressional budgetary action.

No big surprises that the IRS is struggling in its enforcement efforts, that these efforts have declined significantly over the past decade or that they declined significantly during the pandemic.  Still, a pretty bleak picture of the IRS’ ability to pursue meaningful collection action when needed.

Have an IRS Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help