Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2024

Shall I Stay or Shall I Go? – IRS Reports That US Expatriations Jumped Nearly 24% During The Third Quarter Of 2024!

The Internal Revenue Service said in its notice that the number of people who expatriated from the U.S. increased nearly 24% during the third quarter of 2024 compared with the previous quarter. 

The Number Of People Losing Or Renouncing Their U.S. Citizenship Increased to 2,123 For the 3rd Qtr of 2024.

A 25% Increase From The 2nd Quarter of 2024.


Included on the list are those who lost U.S. citizenship under Internal Revenue Code Section 877(a) and Section 877A, according to the notice, as well as long-term residents who are treated as losing citizenship under Section 877(e)(2).

According to CNBC the top reason why Americans abroad want to dump their U.S. citizenship include:
  • Nearly 1 in 4 American expatriates say they are “seriously considering” or “planning” to ditch their U.S. citizenship, a survey from Greenback Expat Tax Services finds.  
  • About 9 million U.S. citizens are living abroad, the U.S. Department of State estimates.
  • More than 4 in 10 who would renounce citizenship say it’s due to the burden of filing U.S. taxes, the Greenback poll shows.

Should I Stay or Should I Go?


Need Advise on Expatriation?

 


Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   

for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com 
or 
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Adds New Unit to Increase Audit Rates for Partnerships, S-Corporations And Trusts!

In IR-2024-276, dated October 22, 2024 the Internal Revenue Service announced the new pass-through field operations unit announced last fall has officially started work in its Large Business and International (LB&I) division to more efficiently conduct audits of pass-through entities.


The Creation Of A New Unit Specifically Devoted
To Ensuring Compliance Of Pass-Throughs Of
Every Size And Form, Including 
Partnerships, S-Corporations And Trusts,
Reflects The IRS’s Broader Efforts To Focus More
Attention And Resources On An Area That
Has Historically Been Under-Scrutinized.

Previously, pass-through exams were divided between LB&I and the Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) division based on the size of the entity. Going forward, revenue agents in pass-through field operations will be assembled into geographically based teams that are responsible for primary exams of pass-through entity returns. LB&I will be responsible for starting pass-through exams, regardless of entity size. SB/SE will continue to examine pass-through entities as part of a related exam of a tax return.

Consolidating the case-working expertise and removing the entity-size barrier helps the IRS achieve its goal of increased audit rates in this complex area, streamlines workflows and provides a more consistent experience for taxpayers.

"The establishment of pass-through field operations is a significant step in our goal to increase fairness in enforcement while improving service,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. 

A pass-through is a business entity in which the profits “pass through” to the owner(s) of that business and are taxed at the individual tax rate. They are frequently used by higher-income groups and can be complex tax arrangements.

"This combination of LB&I and SB/SE’s diverse expertise is an important milestone,” said Holly Paz, LB&I Commissioner. "This group will undoubtedly have a lasting impact as we continue building a modern pass-through compliance structure that is passionate about taxpayer service and fair enforcement.”

The IRS has also embarked on other important changes to help dedicate resources and support to this complex compliance space.

  • The IRS launched examinations of 76 of the largest partnerships with average assets over $10 billion that includes hedge funds, real estate investment partnerships, publicly traded partnerships, large law firms and many other industries. These audits can take years depending on the size and complexity of the partnerships.
  • IRS Chief Counsel announced the creation of a new associate office that will focus exclusively on partnerships, S-corporations, trusts and estates. This office will be drawn from the current Passthroughs and Special Industries (PSI) Office.

The stand-up of pass-through field operations meets one of the priorities of the Strategic Operating Plan under Objective Three: Fairness in Enforcement. 


It is also a significant part of the overall expanded enforcement efforts that focus on high-income and high-wealth individuals, partnerships and large corporations that have seen sharp drops in audit rates during the past decade.


Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)


Read more at: Tax Times blog

Automatic Foreign Gift Reporting Penalty For Late Filed Form 3520, Part IV Ending

According to Law360, the Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Danny Werfel told the UCLA Tax Controversy Conference audience on October 24, 2024 that the agency will no longer automatically assess penalties for the late reporting of large foreign gifts, with the announcement eliciting applause from the audience of several hundred tax attorneys and tax professionals.

Werfel appeared for the second year in a row as a keynote speaker for the event at the Beverly Hills Hotel in Beverly Hills, California, and credited the policy change to the lobbying of National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins, who was sitting in the audience near the front.

Failure to disclose large foreign gifts can result in penalties of up to 25% of the gift under Internal Revenue Code Section 6039F, with the penalty being automatically assessed even though the gift is likely not a taxable event. The penalty can be challenged in court and overturned, but only if it is paid first. 

"So We Have Decided To Stop Assessing Penalties 
Immediately For Late-Filed Forms 3520, Part IV,
Which Deals With Foreign Gifts,"
Werfel Said As The Crowd Applauded.

"And Also, Erin Just Said, 'That's Not All,'
We Also Will Now Review Reasonable Consideration Statements That Are Attached To These Late-Filed Forms Before
We Issue A Penalty. So Those Are The Two Changes."

"So victory for your taxpayer advocate there," Werfel continued. "I think this is an important change for taxpayers and I think this room understands the type of situations this was causing for a person maybe with parents living overseas, a parent dies, now you're dealing with the estate, you're dealing with grief, you're dealing with all the moving pieces, and maybe in the middle of all this you late-file your form, even though it's not a taxable event, and then all of a sudden you get hit with a penalty."

"What we were seeing is a there were a lot of immigrants who had families overseas who were receiving gifts and not knowing about the form, not a big surprise because taxes are complex," Collins said. "Who thinks about filling out a form for a non-taxable event?"

"So victory for your taxpayer advocate there," Werfel continued. "I think this is an important change for taxpayers and I think this room understands the type of situations this was causing for a person maybe with parents living overseas, a parent dies, now you're dealing with the estate, you're dealing with grief, you're dealing with all the moving pieces, and maybe in the middle of all this you late-file your form, even though it's not a taxable event, and then all of a sudden you get hit with a penalty."

Collins was named the taxpayer advocate in February 2020, with the role being the Internal Revenue Service's independent watchdog. Collins spent 20 years as the director of KPMG's western tax controversy services, and before that spent 15 years as an attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel.

Collins said late-filers can explain in an attached form called a reasonable consideration statement why they were late in filing the form and the circumstances that surrounded it. Challenged penalties are overturned about 67% of the time, Collins said, which demonstrates that the IRS is spending a lot of wasted energy on the issue with little to show for the effort. 

Collins said. "Because it's taking a lot of our employees' time and then for taxpayers, it's a really scary thing to open up that piece of paper and see that large penalty. So it's a win-win, I think, for both taxpayers and for the IRS."

"We don't want to penalize people for doing to the right thing and voluntarily coming in and falling on their sword and saying, 'I didn't know,' for whatever reason, and then they get penalized," she continued. "So it really is a good thing for taxpayers."

 On automatic assessment of other foreign information forms, Collins said "I want them all to stop,"

Collins said. "Have the IRS review them before they assess the penalty because of the very high rate of abatement, anywhere from 60% to 80%, depending on the year."

She added that she hoped the IRS "will take additional steps over systemic assessment. Give people an opportunity to say, 'I have reasonable cause and under the law you should not be assessing.'"

In addition to a first-time abatement for Section 6039F penalties, the group recommended a review of reasonable cause prior to penalty assessment. Section 6039F contains exceptions for penalties based on reasonable cause, but over the past several years, the IRS has been assessing penalties without first making this consideration, according to the letter.

Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Appeal of Corporate Transparency Act Reaches the 11th Circuit

On March 5, 2024 we posted Federal Court Rules Corporate Transparency Act Unconstitutional - Do You Still Need to File BOI?  where we discussed that iNational Small Business United v. Janet Yellen, a Northern District of Alabama Federal Judge ruled on March 1, 2024, that the CTA was unconstitutional. Citing privacy concerns, and a myriad of legal reasoning and precedent around the scope of Congress’s power.

Now during the week of Sept 23rd challengers of the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership information reporting requirements argued their position in the first case to reach a federal appellate court, however, it was unclear whether the 11th Circuit panel was receptive. (National Small Business United (NSBU) v. Yellen (No. 24-10736).)

NSBU, however, is not challenging the Corporate Transparency Act as applied in a particular circumstance, but rather has said the law "has no constitutional applications." Prevailing on a facial challenge requires clearing a "very high bar," the government has argued in its briefing and NSBU has failed to do so, said the government, because of the "many valid applications" of the statute as to "companies engaged in interstate commercial activity at the time they file reports."

NSBU has argued that facial challenges should be evaluated under a different standard when enumerated powers are at issue. "If Congress lacks constitutional power to enact a federal statute, then that statute is facially invalid and has no constitutional applications," it said in briefing.

The Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network made its interpretation of the ruling clear in a statement issued by FinCEN stated that the ruling applies (ONLY) to the plaintiffs in NSBU.

Choosing to file means potentially losing a filing fee and any cost incurred for taxpayers who decide to use an advisor. However, filing provides peace of mind, staying in CTA compliance means there's no chance of facing more stringent financial and criminal penalties for failure to file.

Need Help Filing Your BOI Report?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

 


Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help