Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2025

An Off-the-Books Payroll Scheme For Illegal Aliens Forces Florida Man to Plead Guilty

text, whiteboard

According to DoJA Florida man pleaded guilty on August 18, 2025 before Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek for the Middle District of Florida to conspiring to defraud the United States by operating an off-the-books payroll scheme. The plea must be accepted by a U.S. district court judge.

The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: Alexis Garcia conspired with others to operate an illegal, off-the-books cash payroll system for construction workers to avoid paying employment taxes to the IRS and to defraud workers’ compensation insurance companies. Between 2017 and 2019, Garcia managed and directed the operations of Tape Drywall Services Inc., located in Naples, Florida. Contractors entered into agreements with Tape Drywall to provide workers for various construction contracts and provided checks in the name of Tape Drywall for payment. Garcia and his co-conspirator would cash the checks and retain a small percentage as a fee. Garcia and his co-conspirator provided cash to the foremen who used the cash to pay the workers. In total, Garcia and his co-conspirator cashed over 3,600 checks totaling approximately $28 million. 

Garcia and his co-conspirator did not report the wages to the IRS and did not withhold Social Security, Medicare, and federal income taxes from those wage and pay them over to the IRS, as required by law. As a result, Garcia caused a loss to the United States of more than $4.2 million.

In addition, Garcia and his co-conspirator defrauded workers’ compensation companies by substantially misrepresenting the amount of Tape Drywall’s payroll. The misrepresentations resulted in substantially lower insurance payments.

The timely payment of these taxes is critical to the functioning of the U.S. government because, for example, they are the primary source of funding for Social Security and Medicare. 

The Federal Income Taxes That Are Withheld From 
Employees’ Wages Also Account For A Significant Portion 
Of All Federal Income Taxes Collected Each Year. 

Garcia is scheduled to be sentenced at a later date. He faces a maximum penalty of five (5) years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.


 Have Payroll Tax Problems?

word

 

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact Us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888-882-9243) 




 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Second Circuit Opens the Door to Equitable Tolling for Late Tax Court Petitions: Buller et al. v. Comm.

The Second Circuit’s recent decision in Buller et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 24-1557 (2d Cir. 2025), is a game-changer for taxpayers who miss the critical ninety-day deadline to petition the Tax Court after receiving an IRS notice of deficiency.

The Backstory

Mark Buller and Sarah Beatty received a notice of deficiency from the IRS regarding their 2018 income tax return. Under the Internal Revenue Code, they had ninety days to file a petition in Tax Court challenging the IRS’s findings. Unfortunately, their attorney filed the petition nine days late. As is routine, the Tax Court, following its longstanding precedents, found the lateness stripped it of jurisdiction and dismissed the case.

The Appeal and a Shift in the Law

Buller and Beatty didn’t give up. They appealed to the Second Circuit, arguing that the ninety-day deadline shouldn’t be a hard jurisdictional line but rather a procedural rule that, in some cases, could allow for flexibility if there’s a good reason, what’s known as “equitable tolling.”

In a ruling with far-reaching implications, the Second Circuit agreed. The court reasoned that recent Supreme Court decisions have drawn a sharp line between rules that truly limit a court’s power (“jurisdictional” rules) and those that just set up ordinary filing requirements (so-called “claim-processing rules”). The latter can sometimes be bent for equity’s sake.

The court specifically referenced the Supreme Court’s determination in Boechler P.C. v. Commissioner and other cases that deadlines like this one shouldn’t be treated as jurisdictional unless Congress clearly said so, which wasn’t the case here.

What This Means

The Second Circuit held that the ninety-day deadline in section 6213(a) is not jurisdictional, and is instead a claim-processing rule that can be subject to equitable tolling if circumstances justify it. This means the Tax Court can hear late petitions in rare cases where, for instance, the taxpayer was prevented from filing on time due to extraordinary circumstances, though taxpayers will still need to convince the court they meet these criteria.

The court sent Buller and Beatty’s case back to the Tax Court to decide whether their situation met the standard for equitable tolling.

Tax Practitioners And Affected Litigants Should Take
Note: While Deadlines Still Matter, For Some Late Filers,
The Courthouse Doors Are Not Forever Barred.

Why This Matters

Before this decision, missing the ninety-day filing deadline almost always spelled doom for a taxpayer’s Tax Court challenge, no matter the reason for the delay. Going forward, at least in the Second Circuit, taxpayers whose late filings result from circumstances beyond their control now have a shot at getting their day in court.

This aligns the Tax Court’s approach with modern Supreme Court doctrine and signals a more flexible, humanity-driven reading of procedural requirements, at least in cases where equity calls for a second look.

 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)





Sources:

1.       https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/24-1557/24-1557-2025-08-14.html

2.      https://kpmg.com/us/en/taxnewsflash/news/2025/08/second-circuit-90-day-time-limit-equitable-tolling.html

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Unveils New Guidance to Streamline Corporate Audits

On July 11, 2025, the IRS released a memo targeting audits of large corporate taxpayers, marking a significant modernization in how the agency approaches complex corporate tax examinations. This update, addressed to employees in the IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) Division, aims to reduce administrative burdens, improve efficiency, and make dispute resolution more accessible for taxpayers.

Phasing Out the “Acknowledgment of Facts” Process

One of the headline changes is the planned elimination of the “acknowledgment of facts” (AOF) information request starting in 2026. The AOF was him him him him him him while the group of him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him him to establish agreement on important facts between the IRS and taxpayers prior to issuing a notice of proposed adjustment. However, as the agency acknowledges in its new memo, participation from taxpayers in this process has been minimal. Many have found AOF to be cumbersome and of little value, arguing that the factual summaries provided are hard to evaluate without knowing how the IRS intends to apply the law. Bowing to this feedback, the IRS will phase out the AOF, hoping to foster a more streamlined and transparent audit process.

Expanding Accelerated Issue Resolution

The amended guidance also clarifies how the accelerated issue resolution (AIR) process applies, particularly in large corporate cases. The AIR procedure allows issues resolved during one audit cycle to be applied to other tax years for the same taxpayer. By making it clear that this process extends to substantial corporate cases, the IRS hopes to resolve recurring issues more efficiently and reduce redundant disputes in future audits.

Updates to Fast Track Settlement Procedures

Finally, the IRS has updated its fast track settlement program procedures. This program is designed to help taxpayers resolve disputes with the IRS quickly, ideally avoiding litigation. Under the new guidance, if IRS directors wish to deny a taxpayer’s request to participate in the fast track program, they must first notify the division’s deputy commissioner, adding an extra layer of oversight to ensure fairer access to alternative dispute resolution.

What This Means for Corporate Taxpayers

For large businesses, these changes are welcome news, promising shorter audits and improved opportunities to settle tax disputes amicably. Corporate taxpayers should consult with their advisors about how these changes might impact ongoing and future IRS examinations, as the agency seems committed to a more responsive and less adversarial audit environment.

The IRS's latest guidance demonstrates a willingness to adapt based on taxpayer feedback. By eliminating outdated processes and expanding successful programs, the agency is taking meaningful steps toward a more efficient tax system for large businesses.


 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)


Read more at: Tax Times blog

All That You Wanted to Know About Form 706NA – Part I

 On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 we posted Issues Concerning Filing a Form 706NA? where we discussed that deceased nonresidents who were not American citizens are subject to U.S. estate taxation with respect to their U.S.-situated assets. We also discussed that Many foreigners owning property or assets in the United States are in violation of 706-NA filing requirements because of a number of misunderstandings. The basic rule is pretty clear-if a foreign decedent has assets in the United States with a gross value in excess of $60,000, the estate is supposed to file a tax return with the Internal Revenue Service. 

Now we are supplementing this posting with a discussion regarding Form 706 NA in a 3 part series, which we have titled All That You Wanted to Know About Form 706NA. PART 1: 

In the area of estate tax compliance, many of us have prepared Form 706’s, the estate tax return for US citizens and domiciliaries.  To be sure, this form is quite voluminous and can take a while to fill out but there are very few mysteries beyond schedule E; what percentage of an asset might be includable in an estate, the value of an annuity, what debts and expenses are deductible, the calculation of the marital deduction, and the generation-skipping tax computation. 

The Form 706NA, however, preparation of the tax return for the estate of the nonresident alien owning property in the United States, can present a more daunting task.
Form 706NA is deceptively simple- two pages- how difficult could it be to prepare? For 32 years as a senior attorney at the IRS, our Estate Tax Attorney Robert S. Blumenfeld audited these tax returns, and he can tell you that they are more fraught with more potential mystery than the Sphinx. 
Let's look at line 1 where it requests  the decedent's name. Many foreign decedents come from countries where people have hyphenated names, especially the spouses. So is the correct name Maria Smith or Maria Smith- Gonzalez? It is often best to go back to the country where the decedent lived and use the name which drops the post hyphenated portion. Most of the tax returns that he has seen or prepared, are based it on this concept.
The next box asked for the decedent’s tax identification number. Virtually all American citizens born in the United States are assigned SS#’s at birth so there is no problem. In the case of a nonresident alien (N/A), there is no tax identification number so we enter “N/A-nonresident alien” inbox two. 
This creates the second problem. If the estate has to pay any transfer tax, when the return is filed, there is no module (TIN or SS#) into which the IRS can place the payments. Ergo, the IRS has a fund called “unpostables” where money paid to the IRS lacks an identification number with which to associate it. Therefore, if you file a Form 706NA which shows tax, be certain to keep a copy of the front of the check and photostat the endorsement after the check is negotiated. This is the least difficult way to associate the payment with the tax return. Absent keeping these two identification benchmarks, it could take many months for the IRS to agree that the payment in the unpostable module should be associated with a particular estate.
Decedent’s domicile and citizenship are very critical. The United States currently has circa 20 estate/gift tax treaties with foreign countries, many of which are in Europe. 
A non-resident alien from a non-treaty country receives an estate tax exemption (unified credit) of $13,000 which basically means that the first $60,000 is not taxed. The unified credit for treaty based countries can reach a figure of $5.5 million free of tax. In addition to this, in each instance where one represents a nonresident alien decedent, it is critical to find out whether this is a country which has such a treaty with the United States. 
Next, it is critical to determine the citizenship and domicile of the decedent. When one peruses the individual treaties, one will note that some treaties are based on domicile, others on citizenship.  A German citizen domiciled in say Mexico would not be able to utilize the German treaty because that particular treaty is predicated on domicile. A Mexican citizen however, domiciled in Germany, could enjoy the full benefit of the US/German treaty. Ergo, a German living in Mexico would have a $60,000 exemption from tax while a Mexican domiciled in Germany would have a $5.5 million exemption.

Have a US Estate Tax Problem?


Estate Tax Problems Require

an Experienced Estate Tax Attorney 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Robert S. Blumenfeld  - 
 Estate Tax Counsel
Mr. Blumenfeld concentrates his practice in the areas of International Tax and Estate Planning, Probate Law, and Representation of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens before the IRS.

Prior to joining Marini & Associates, P.A., he spent 32 years as the Senior Attorney with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Deputy Commissioner, International.

While with the IRS, he examined approximately 2,000 Estate Tax Returns and litigated various international and tax issues associated with these returns.As a result of his experience, he has extensive knowledge of the issues associated with and the preparation of U.S. Estate Tax Returns for Resident and Non-Resident Aliens, Gift Tax Returns, Form 706QDT and Qualified Domestic Trusts.

  

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help