FACTS:
1. 1. If the fair market value of the notes is less than the fair market value of the property transferred to the grantor trusts, the difference in value is a deemed gift.at Marini & Associates, P.A.
Read more at: Tax Times blog

August 1, 2013
FACTS:
1. 1. If the fair market value of the notes is less than the fair market value of the property transferred to the grantor trusts, the difference in value is a deemed gift.
Read more at: Tax Times blog
July 30, 2013
The court decided Garcia's contract with his sponsor TaylorMade had attributed too much of the money to royalty payments for image rights, which the treaty exempts from US tax.
Mickelson capped a dominant fortnight in Scotland by shooting a final round 66 to come from behind and win The Open Championship. He also won the Scottish Open the previous week. For his two weeks of play, earned £1,445,000, or about $2,167,500.
Read more at: Tax Times blog
July 30, 2013
Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, U.S. partnerships are required to withhold income tax on "effectively connected taxable income" deemed allocable to foreign partners.
The U.S. partnership must file a Form 8805, Foreign Partner's Information Statement of Section 1446 Withholding Tax, to show the amount of effectively connected taxable income and the total tax credit allocable to the foreign partner for the partnership's tax year.
Foreign partners must attach this form to their U.S. income tax returns to claim a withholding credit for their shares of the Section 1446 tax withheld by the partnership.
Read more at: Tax Times blog
July 29, 2013
Petitioner challenged the IRS's determination that the gross income petitioners reported in 2003 and 2004 based on their ownership of a controlled foreign corporation should have been taxed at the rate of petitioners' ordinary income rather than the lower tax rate they had claimed.
At issue was whether amounts included in petitioners' gross income for 2003 and 2004 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 951(a)(1)(B) and 956 (collectively, "section 951 inclusions") constituted qualified dividend income under 26 U.S.C. 1(h)(11).
The court concluded that section 951 inclusions did not constitute actual dividends because actual dividends required a distribution by a corporation and receipt by a shareholder and these section 951 inclusions involved no distribution or change in ownership; Congress clearly did not intend to deem as dividends the section 951 inclusions at issue here; and petitioners' reliance on other non-binding sources were unavailing.
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the tax court. View "Rodriguez, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" on Justia Law
Read more at: Tax Times blog