Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Blog

CCA Finds That Information Reporting Penalties Are Divisable Taxes For The “Full Payment Rule” for a Refund Suit.

In Chief Counsel Advice 201315017, the IRS has determined that the penalties under Code Sec. 6721 for failure to file an information return and Code Sec. 6722 for failure to furnish a correct payee statement are divisible taxes for purposes of establishing refund suit jurisdiction.
 
The penalties are calculated on a per-transaction basis, and the penalties are waived on an individual basis if the failure at issue is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect.
 
To meet the jurisdictional requirements of a refund suit, a taxpayer must generally make full payment of assessed taxes due before the matter may be adjudicated. See Flora, 362 U.S. at 177. In general, the partial payment of assessed taxes or a proposed deficiency is insufficient to support refund suit jurisdiction. Id. 
 
The majority opinion in Flora, however, noted that one possible exception to the full payment rule might exist where certain “tax assessments may be divisible into a tax on each transaction or event, so that the full-payment rule would probably require no more than payment of a small amount.” Flora, 362 U.S. at 175-78, n.38. The Court was referring at that time to excise taxes. The Court’s analysis, however, hinged divisibility on a tax being levied on each transaction or event.
 
The CCA found that the Code Sec. 6721 and Code Sec. 6722 penalties are divisible penalties. Therefore, Taxpayer was only required to pay the divisible amount of the penalty attributable to a single failure before filing a refund claim and instituting a refund suit under Code Sec. 7422.

Disagree with the IRS' Assessment of an Exercise or Withholding Tax?

Want to Pay for 1Incident or 1 Transaction and Sue in Court Of Claims for Refund?

Contact the Tax Lawyers of Marini & Associates, P.A.

for a FREE Tax Consultation at: www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

More Unbelievable FBAR Penalties Cases!

A 1500% penalty rate on the taxes avoided/FBAR penalty, is imposed in a California case.

  • Is a 1500% penalty constitutionally permissible?
  • Of course the Defendant knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty, but should the IRS CID even be able to have the leverage to force someone to this type of penalty?


 

FBAR: Isreal & Luxemborg a warning for unreported foreign accounts

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Cayman and BVI to Agree to FATCA with US & Bahamas will Decide on FATCA by June.

We originally posted UK mini-FATCA Agreements Spells The End for UK Tax Haven Territories! on Monday, November 26, 2012. The UK and some other European countries have negotiating FATCA agreements with the US.

 

The British Virgin Islands plan to sign a Model 1 FATCA agreement with the US, in the BVI's case a non-reciprocal one. On 4 April 2013 the BVI Government announced that it would pursue a Model I B FATCA agreement.

This closely followed the announcement on 15 March 2012 by Cayman Islands Ministry for Financial Services that the Cayman Islands would pursue a Model I Agreement.

Both announcements had been widely anticipated and both jurisdictions also intend to sign a similar arrangement for automatic provision of bank information to the UK.

Bahamas to decide on FATCA by June

The Bahamas government will decide by 1 June whether to negotiate an agreement with the US over implementation of the US Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

 
 


Are you a US Taxpayer 
with Un-Reported Income?
Do you Value your Personal Freedom?
Contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. 
for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Sources:

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help