Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Blog

Success of Florida Boat Sales/Use Tax Cap

Florida took in nearly 10 times as much sales tax revenue on sales of tax-capped boats as the state projected in the first year of implementation of the Maritime Full Employment Act, which was signed in 2010.

That’s according to a study released by the Florida Yacht Brokers Association and the Marine Industries Association of South Florida.

The new law puts an $18,000 sales-and-use tax cap on boats purchased or brought into Florida. The new sales-and-use tax cap generated in excess of $13.46 million in direct sales tax revenue for the state, compared with a $1.5 million first-year loss that a Florida legislative staff analysis had projected.

Thomas J. Murray and Associates Inc. conducted the initial research and subsequent survey.
Prior to July 1, 2010, all boats sold and or delivered in Florida were subject to a 6 percent sales-and-use tax unless they were specifically exempt. A new 34-foot powerboat that cost $400,000, for example, would cost $24,000 more in taxes.

Among the survey’s findings:

• The average sales price for post-cap transactions in Florida was $907,002 — nearly double the pretax value of closings that took place in Florida prior to the cap.

• In the post-cap era, transactions for which either no sales tax was paid or the closing was conducted out of state dropped from 21.5 percent in the pre-cap era to an estimated 12.8 percent after the sales tax cap was implemented.

“The results of our survey research demonstrate beyond a doubt that setting a reasonable tax basis for high dollar purchases provides an incentive for more boats to be purchased, provisioned and kept plying the waters of Florida,” FYBA spokesman Jeff Erdmann, owner of Bollman Yachts of Fort Lauderdale, said in a statement. “More boats sold and registered in Florida means more business and jobs for Floridians.”

A little over a year ago, there was no caps on sales tax and rather than pay the tax, people would offshore register their yachts rather than pay Florida Sales Tax on them. With a cap, Florida is receiving badly need income they did not receive prior to the cap being put into effect. It was a good move and long overdue.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

FBAR Non-Filers Beware: Either Tax Fraud OR Filing a False Tax Return Can Result in Deportation

Recently the Supreme Court held in Kawashima v. Holder (Feb. 21, 2012) that filing a false tax return in violation of IRC Section 7206(1) as well as other criminal tax offenses are aggravated felonies which can result in deportation of a resident alien.

Background, Mr. and Mrs. Kawashima were legal residents of the United States having moved to Los Angeles from Japan in 1984. According to an article in the Los Angeles Times they opened several sushi restaurants in the West San Fernando Valley area of Southern California. They were accused of violating various criminal tax laws, and in 1997 Mr. Kawashima pled guilty to a single count of violating Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 7206(1) (filing a false tax return). Mrs. Kawashima pled guilty to IRC Section 7206(2) (aiding and assisting in the filing of a false tax return). The tax loss was around $245,000. This would have included interest and penalties so the actual tax would have been much lower. It is possible that the Kawashimas pled guilty to charges under IRC Section 7206 to avoid the IRS bringing tax evasion charges under IRC Section 7201. Tax evasion carries a maximum penalty of 5 years, and a $250,000 fine; whereas filing a false tax return "only" has a penalty of $100,000 and 3 years in prison.

Neither the 9th Circuit opinion, nor the Supreme Court opinion stated whether they served any jail time, but according to the Los Angeles Times they repaid the full amount due to the IRS. The Kawashimas probably assumed that their tax problems ended there, but in 2001 the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), as it was then known, brought removal proceedings, against the Kawashimas seeking their deportation alleging that they had committed an "aggravated felony." These proceedings were brought pursuant to 8 USC § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) (stating that "[a]ny alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable"). An aggravated felony is defined in 8 USC Section 1101(a)(43)M)(i) as any offense that "involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000."

The Kawashimas argued that filing a false tax return was not an aggravated felony. They relied on a related section of the law which specifically states that the commission of tax fraud pursuant to IRC Section 7201 is an offense which may lead to deportation. From that the Kawashimas criminal tax lawyers concluded that Congress intended that the only tax crime which would qualify for deportation is tax fraud, and not any other lesser tax crime.

Unfortunately for the Kawashimas in a divided 6-3 opinion the Supreme Court disagreed, clearing the way for the Kawashimas deportation. In her dissent, Justice Ginsburg pointed out that as a policy matter the majority made a bad choice because it would discourage immigrants from pleading guilty to tax crimes since in addition to any jail time they would be exposed to being deported.

Criminal tax lawyers will need to advise their alien clients of this distinct possibility as one of the many factors to take into account when deciding whether or not to plead guilty to any tax crime. The concern for FBAR (foreign bank account report) non-filers is that without regard to whether or not failure to file an FBAR is a deportable offense individuals who do not file FBARs generally have filed false tax returns by checking the "no box" on Schedule B signifying they don't have a foreign bank account when in fact they do.

If you have been contacted by the IRS Criminal Investigation unit, or have any criminal or civil tax problems contact the tax litigation attorneys at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a confidential consultation.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Unique Identification Number Allows IRS to Identify Foreign Entities

A new IRS Webpage on how to file tax forms related to foreign interests using a unique reference identification number (URI) is designed to allow the Internal Revenue Service to more easily identify a taxpayer's foreign entities and compare their activities, or lack of activities, from year to year.

Beginning with U.S. federal tax returns filed for the 2012 tax year, taxpayers who file a Form 5471 (Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations), a Form 8858 (Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Foreign Disregarded Entities), or Form 8865 (Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships), must provide the URI or employer identification number for all foreign entities reported on the forms.

Implementation of URIs could pose varied obstacles for taxpayers who are unprepared.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

FinCEN postpones mandatory FBAR e-filing

The IRS does not permit electronic filing of US income tax returns for preparers living outside the US. It remains to be seen if they will apply the same rule to FBAR forms. For 2011 FBAR forms should be manually filed as in the past. Failure to file FBAR forms on time may result in substantial penalties.

http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&articleID=5580335021484421124&gid=4064315&type=member&item=99086828&articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaccountingtoday%2Ecom%2Fnews%2FFinCEN-Adjusts-Efile-FBAR-Requirements-61877-1%2Ehtml&urlhash=mDdE&goback=%2Egmp_4064315%2Egde_4064315_member_99086828

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help