Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Blog

European Union Savings Directive (EUSD) – Amendment Is Coming Soon

Banks in EU must report beneficial owner information or implement 35% withholding tax on any interest payment to zero tax offshore entity effectively managed in the EUSD territory.

There is a list of jurisdictions outside the scope of the EUSD and includes Barbados, Panama, Belize, Bermuda and Hong Kong and St.Lucia among others.
Also the list includes places that will have to pass legislation to enact the EUSD amendments including, Cayman, BVI, IOM, Jersey, Monaco, Switzerland

A typical example includes a scenario where a BVI company with a Swiss bank account and Swiss directors pays interest to an EU resident. That transaction will attract either withholding tax at 35% or the automatic reporting of the beneficial owner information. Any interest payment to an untaxed entity or legal arrangement managed within the savings tax territory in another country, even if beneficiary is a non-EU resident.

Life insurance and payments of benefits under certain life insurance policies is also addressed in the amended EUSD.

Even non-EUSD jurisdiction IBCs or zero tax vehicles are roped into the directive if the IBC is effectively managed in the EU for example the trustees or even company nominees are based in the EU. Jurisdictions like Panama, Belize, Barbados, Hong Kong and Singapore all suffer the same fate. Where zero tax entities incorporated in these jurisdictions are effectively managed in the EU and payments are being made to apply the savings directive.

If the banking jurisdiction has banking secrecy but the IBC or offshore trust or foundation is effectively managed in the EU the EUSD applies.

For more information go to: http://cititrust.biz/blog/?p=415

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Julius Baer Financial Advisers in Switzerland Accused of Scheme to Conceal $600 Million

A pair of Swiss bank financial advisers have been charged with conspiring with U.S. clients to hide more than $600 million from the Internal Revenue Service in offshore accounts, prosecutors announced Oct. 11 (United States v. Casadei, S.D.N.Y., No. 11 Crim. 866, indictment unsealed 10/11/11).

In an indictment unsealed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, client advisers Daniela Casadei and Fabio Frazzetto were accused of helping clients evade U.S. taxes by advising them to open undeclared accounts under code names or fictional names. They worked for an institution identified by prosecutors as “Swiss Bank No. 1,” which sources said is Julius Baer Group Ltd.

Casadei and Frazzetto also allegedly advised clients not to worry about U.S. law enforcement authorities because the bank no longer had offices on U.S. soil, the indictment charged. In one case, it said, Frazzetto specifically discouraged a client from making a voluntary disclosure to IRS, telling him not to “panic.” Daniela Casadei and Fabio Frazzetto conspired with more than 180 U.S. clients and others at the bank to hide at least $600 million in assets from the Internal Revenue Service, according to the indictment in federal court in New York and the person, who wasn’t authorized to speak about the matter. The indictment refers to the bank as Swiss Bank No. 1.

“The bank is one of a number of Swiss financial institutions supporting the ongoing tax negotiations between the U.S. and Switzerland and is cooperating with the U.S. government investigation,” Baer said in an e-mailed statement today.

For more information go to http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-11/two-swiss-bankers-accused-of-helping-u-s-clients-evade-taxes?category=%2Fleaders%2F

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Program for Employers who have Misclassified Independant Contractors

Employers have a strong withholding and employment tax incentives to classify their workers as independent contractors instead of employees. Such a course avoids income tax withholdings and FICA, FUTA, and Medicare taxes and withholdings, shifting responsibility of such items to the worker. 

As such, employers may have aggressively or inappropriately classified employees as independent contractors. An IRS settlement program known as the “Voluntary Classification Settlement Program,” or VCSP, provides a semi-painless way for employers to correct their classifications and come into the fold of compliant taxpayers. A recent set of FAQs provides details on the new program. Below is a summary of the key provisions.

WHO CAN USE THE PROGRAM?

Businesses, tax-exempt organizations, and government entities.

BASIC ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

To be able to apply, the employer must:

     (1) have consistently treated the subject workers as nonemployees,

     (2) have filed all required Forms 1099 for the workers for the previous three years, and

     (3) not be under audit by IRS, or currently under audit concerning the classification of the workers by the Department of Labor or a state government agency.


EFFECT OF PROGRAM

The employer will have to pay a relatively small sum to enter the program, but will then receive absolution for its mischaracterizations for past years. More particularly, the employer  will: 

     (1) owe 10% of the employment tax liability that may have been due on compensation paid to the workers for the most recent tax year, applying the special reduced rates of Code Section 3509, and without interest or penalties being imposed on that liability, 

     (2) be safe from an employment tax audit for the worker classification of the subject workers for prior years, and 

      (3) have to agree to extend the period of limitations on assessment of employment taxes for three years for the first, second and third calendar years beginning after the date on which the taxpayer has agreed under the VCSP closing agreement to begin treating the workers as employees. 


Of course, the employer will begin classifying the subject workers as employees and paying appropriate employment and withholding taxes. 

Given the relatively small amount that is due, the program provides an excellent opportunity for taxpayers to put themselves into compliance.

In an example provided in the FAQ, an employer who paid $1,500,000 to workers in the subject tax year owed only $16,020 for the required 10% payment. 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

JK Harris to file for bankruptcy

The JK Harris company once advertised that it could resolve people's tax debts for "pennies on the dollar," but now it could be the company's creditors and disgruntled former clients who will get less than they are owed.

JK Harris & Co. plans to seek bankruptcy protection in Charleston to head off an attempt by the Texas attorney general's office to force the company into receivership, said company founder John K. Harris.

The company, a national tax-debt-resolution service based in Goose Creek, has been dogged by cash-flow problems and the cost of large settlements related to claims that it misled consumers.

The bankruptcy filing is aimed at selling the business quickly while writing off debt. The company would continue operations in the meantime.

 For more information go to http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2011/oct/07/jk-harris-to-file-for-bankruptcy

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help