Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Category Archives: From Live Blog

Seven Facts You Should Know About Tax Expatriation

  • Has the passage of ObamaCare made you think about leaving the country?

  • Has the 2017 TCJA changes on international reporting, pushed you over the edge?
  • Or maybe you are a naturalized U.S. citizen or permanent resident who has prospered here, but would now like to move back the old country for retirement?

Whatever your motives, just because you leave the United States and renounce your citizenship, don't assume you can leave U.S. taxes or filing or U.S. tax forms and its complexity behind. 

If you expatriated on or after June 3, 2004, but before June 17, 2008, certain expatriation tax rules apply under Internal Revenue Code 877. If you are subject to expatriation tax, you must file a Form 1040NR (a U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return) for each year in the 10-year period following expatriation. The expatriation tax for these filers applies to U.S.-source gross income and gains on a net basis.

What if you leave now? For those who expatriate after June 16, 2008, the rules are different, since Internal Revenue Code Section 877A applies instead of Section 877. You are subject to an immediate exit tax, which deems you (for tax purposes) to have sold all of your worldwide property for its fair market value the day before your departure from the U.S.
In 1994 a Forbescover story described how such wealthy Americans as Campbell Soup heir John (Ippy) Dorrance III, the late Carnival founder Ted Arison and Dart Container heir Kenneth Dart had given up their U.S. citizenship and avoided U.S. income or estate tax. Perhaps the most clever was Dart, who managed to come back "home" as the Belize ambassador to the U.S., manning a newly opened Belize embassy in Sarasota, Fla., right where he had previously lived! Since that time, Congress has repeatedly tightened the screws on tax-motivated expatriation and below are 10 things you need to know about expatriation:

1. Expatriating Means Really Leaving.
To even think about putting himself beyond the reach of the Internal Revenue Service, a citizen must give up U.S. citizenship and (in the case of citizens subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 877) severely limit the time spend in the U.S. to not more than 30 days a year. Under that section, a person who attempts to renounce U.S. citizenship but then spends more than 30 days a year in the U.S. will be treated as a U.S. citizen or resident for that year. You may think no one has ever done this, but many have. Permanent U.S. residents (holding green cards) also pay U.S. tax on their worldwide income. They may find it easier to take the expatriation plunge, particularly if family or business opportunities beckon in their country of origin.

2. Tax Avoidance is Now Irrelevant.
In 2004 (in the American Jobs Creation Act), Congress threw out the tax avoidance motive test altogether, imposing 10 years of U.S. tax on U.S. source gross income and gains on a net basis if you left the country for any reason. However, Congress increased the threshold for determining who was subject to this expatriation tax. An individual was only subject to the expatriation tax if he had an average net annual income tax for the five years preceding expatriation of $124,000, or if he had a net worth of $2 million or more on the date of expatriation. If you expatriated on or after June 17, 2008, under the new Section 877A, there is a higher net worth threshold, currently $145,000 of annual net income tax for 2010.
In some cases, even if you're below these thresholds, you'll get taxed. For example, expatriates must certify their past U.S. tax compliance by filing an IRS Form 8854. Any expatriate who fails to certify compliance with U.S. federal income tax laws for the five taxable years preceding expatriating is subject to the expatriate income tax even if he didn't meet the income tax liability or net worth tests.
Plus, later U.S. visits can be expensive if you expatriated before June 17, 2008 (and Internal Revenue Code Section 877 applies). In that case if an expatriate comes back to the U.S. for more than 30 days in any year during the 10 years following expatriation, that person is considered a resident of the U.S. for that whole tax year. That means the person would again be subject to U.S. tax on his worldwide income, not just his U.S.-source income.

This 30-day rule does, however, have an exception for any days (up to a 30-day limit) that the individual performed personal services in the U.S. for an employer (who is not related). This exception only applies if that individual either had certain ties with other countries or was physically present in the U.S. for 30 days or less for each year in the 10-year period on the date of expatriation or termination of residency.

3. There are Special Rules for Long-Term Residents.
It's easy to define who is or is not a U.S. citizen, but the term "long-term resident" isn't quite so clear. A long-term resident is a non-U.S. citizen who is a lawful permanent resident of the U.S. in at least eight years during the 15-year period before that person's residency ends. A "lawful permanent resident" means a green card holder. However, a person is not treated as a lawful permanent resident for purposes of this eight-year test in a year in which that person is treated as a resident of a foreign country under a tax treaty, and does not waive the treaty benefits applicable to the residents of that country. Caution: holding a green card for even one day during a year will taint the whole year.

4. There's an Exit Tax for Expatriations on or after June 17, 2008.

If you are a U.S. citizen or long-term resident who expatriates on or after June 17, 2008, you will be deemed (for tax purposes) to have sold all of your worldwide property for its fair market value the day before you leave the U.S. All that gain is subject to U.S. tax at the capital gains rate. Plus, all your gain is taken into account without regard to any other tax provisions in the Internal Revenue Code.

Put differently, you get all of the bad parts of the tax code, and none of the good. That would include, for example, the inability to benefit from the $250,000 per person ($500,000 per couple) exclusion from gain on a principal residence (Section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code) and many other rules.

The exit tax is like an estate tax, in the sense that everything that would be part of your estate will be subject to income tax on unrealized gains as of the day before you expatriate, as if you sold all your assets the day before leaving. In effect this is Congress' way of making sure your assets don't escape the estate tax entirely through expatriation.

5. Some Expatriates Can Escape the Exit Tax.
In general the exit tax is unforgiving and has broad application. Yet if you have less than $600,000 of income from the deemed sale of your assets on expatriation, you pay no tax. This exemption amount is adjusted for inflation and is $627,000 for 2010. If your gain exceeds this amount, you must allocate the gain pro rata among all appreciated property.
However, this exclusion amount must be allocated to each item of property with built-in gain on a proportional basis. This involves a complicated process of multiplying the exclusion amount by the ratio of the built-in gain for each gain asset over the total built-in gain of all gain assets. The exclusion amount allocated to each gain asset may not exceed the amount of that asset's built-in gain.

Moreover, if the total allowable gain of all gain assets is less than the exclusion amount, the exclusion amount that can be allocated to the gain assets will be limited to that amount of gain. For example, in 2010, if the total allowable gain in an expatriate's assets was $500,000, then that $500,000 would be the limit instead of $627,000.

Fortunately not all expatriates face the exit tax; only "covered expatriates" do. Under prior law, you generally had to give notice you were expatriating to trigger the rules. Now if you relinquish your passport or green card, it's generally automatic. But some expatriates, even under the new law, can escape the exit tax. The financial thresholds can still exempt you. Some people born with dual citizenship who haven't had a substantial presence in the U.S. and certain minors who expatriated before the age of 18-and-a-half are also exempt. However, those people must still file an IRS Form 8854 Expatriation Information Statement.

6. You Can Elect to Defer the Exit Tax.
If you do face the exit tax, you can make an irrevocable election (on a property-by-property basis) to defer it until you actually sell the property. This election allows people to leave the U.S. and expatriate without triggering immediate tax as long as the IRS is assured it will collect the tax in the future.

To qualify, a covered expatriate must provide a bond or other adequate security for the tax liability. There are specific requirements for these security bonds. Plus, there is an updating and monitoring of the bond in case it becomes inadequate to cover the tax. The IRS scrutinizes these elections on a case-by-case basis, so hire an expert. There are detailed requirements for filing the deferral election, including documentation, and copies of various documents.
One of these requirements is appointing a U.S. agent for the limited purpose of accepting communications with the IRS. Plus, the taxpayer must waive any tax treaty benefits that might otherwise impact the IRS getting its money. It doesn't appear that many of these deferral elections have been made so far.
There's another reason, other than the bond, not to defer. When you do sell, you'll pay taxes at the rate then in effect, which may be higher.
7. You Will Need Professional Help.
As you might expect, there are forms to file and procedures to follow if you expatriate. In fact, if you are wavering, the paperwork alone may keep you stateside.

You must file IRS Form 8854 and in some cases you must file it for 10 years. Additional special forms (Form W-8CE if you have any deferred compensation items, a specified tax deferred account, certain non-grantor trusts, etc.) are also required.
 
Gone Are The Days When The Taxpayer Could Renounce U.S. Citizenship and Stand A Good Chance Of Avoiding U.S. Tax! 
Since this discussion barely scratches the surface of the various issues associated with expatriation, you should obtain the advice of a Tax Attorney who has experience in expatriation tax issues.
Should I Stay or Should I Go?

 Need Advise on Expatriation …  

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com or 
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)   

Source

Forbes

Read more at: Tax Times blog

TCJA 2017 Just Another Reasons to Expatriate?

On May 8, 2017, we posted Is it Time to Expatriate? Your Neighbors Are, where we discussed that the Treasury Department published the names of individuals who renounced their U.S. citizenship or terminated their long-term U.S. residency “Expatriated” during the fourth quarter of 2016. 

  • The number of published expatriates for the quarter was 2,365, bringing the total number of published expatriates in 2016 to 5,411.   
  • The number of expatriates for 2016 is a 26% increase over 2015 and a 58% increase over 2014 (3,415).  


Since then, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed many, many parts of the Internal Revenue Code. The international tax rules, in particular, have been massively changed. But Congress did not touch Sections 877A or 2801 of the Internal Revenue Code. Those are the two special-purpose statutes that impose tax on people who renounce US citizenship or abandon their green cards.Therefore, someone who expatriates in 2018 will face the same tax laws that applied to someone expatriating in 2017, 2016, or before.
 But for a certain group of Americans (mostly living abroad), the TCJA tax law radically increased the cost of keeping US citizenship. The economic incentives for renouncing citizenship or abandoning a green card, have tilted further in favor expatriation. It is now more expensive for these people to retain US citizenship. 

The people who may want to rethink their citizenship, will be Americans, who own or invest in foreign businesses. Basically a US taxpayer with a US passport (or green card) and a business outside the United States. This group of people, entrepreneurs, investors, are the people we work with day in and day out. They face two new disincentives, created byof the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: 

  1. Tax. Corporate profit that previously would not be taxed in the United States may now be taxed in the United States (GILTI Tax); and
  2. Professional Fees. The new tax laws add complexity and uncertainty.
 
Consider as an example a US citizen living abroad and to owns 100% of a foreign corporation. The foreign corporation has a business income, including anything from retail sales to professional service. Before the 2017 TCJA, the US citizen could reasonably expect that corporate profits would be taxable in the foreign country, but not in the United States. The US citizen would only pay US income tax on salary and dividends received.
 
The new laws create new methods by which the United States can tax a US shareholder on profits earned by a foreign corporation. (e.g. GILTI Tax).

 
The new tax laws created potential tax breaks for foreign corporations owned by US corporations. In many instances foreign profits flow upstream to the US parent corporation without further US tax.  

These tax breaks do not apply to foreign corporations owned by US individuals. The new tax rules force profits upstream to be taxed in the hands of the US shareholders, the tax breaks available to US corporations are available for US persons, unless they make a section 936 election to be tax is a corporation, solely for their CFC income.
 
Because of the additional complexity, there will be heavy legal and accounting fees for the American entrepreneur abroad to navigate the new tax law's impact. Furthermore, legal and accounting fees will be more expensive in the future. Form 5471 is now going to be more complicated than before, and that means more money to prepare that tax form.
 

American business owners just had to deal with the transition tax"Section 965," which required them to be taxable on their deferred CFC income as of December 31, 2017, which takes all of the retained earnings of foreign corporation and report this as taxable income in 2017".
 For Americans who own foreign businesses which have been operating for 20 years, they might have  million of dollars in retained earnings in their controlled foreign corporations.

They face of hundreds of thousands of dollars in US tax liability on prior years retained earnings, payable over eight years, starting with their 2017 tax return.


These changes in the 2017 TCJA in the final straw for Americans and we have received emails and calls from US taxpayers asking requesting information about expatriation.

Feel Overwhelmed by IRS 
International Income Tax Law?

 

Need Advise on Expatriation ... 

 

 
Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)

 

 

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

According to TIGTA – The IRS Systematically Loses and Destroys Important Taxpayer Records

According to a report (TIGTA Report) dated July 13 2017, by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) systematically loses and destroys important taxpayer records due to carelessness and negligence.

1 Freedom of Information Act Responses Were Found Lacking. Even when taxpayers request files from the IRS under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the IRS work has been somewhat careless and one is left with little confidence that the agency will make a serious attempt to find the requested documents. FOIA enables the public to request access to Federal records and information. The IRS’ ability to adequately respond to FOIA requests is essential in maintaining the public’s trust and ensuring transparency in this government agency.   

Yet, the TIGTA Report found numerous problems with the FOIA requests including these: “the search methods used were not properly documented in accordance with IRS policies, did not identify all potential custodians, and erroneously concluded that records associated with separated employees had been destroyed when potentially responsive records were available.

Federal laws governing FOIA searches, IRS policies for responding to congressional requests, and court procedures all include specific guidance that requires adequate searches of records in response to external requests. However, in some of the cases reviewed, documentation of IRS search efforts in response to requests for records was not adequate.”
 In addition, federal law mandates that FOIA requests have explicit response deadlines specifically, Federal agencies are required to respond to requests within 20 business days of receipt, and can request an extension of 10 working days.

If an agency grants a FOIA request, the law requires that the agency make responsive records “promptly available” to the requester.  TIGTA examined almost 50,000 closed FOIA cases during its audit period.  The IRS records indicated that over 36,000 FOIA cases were closed in 20 business days or less. For the almost 13,000 remaining cases, the average closing time was 51 business days. In reviewing the remaining cases that had much longer processing times, TIGTA found that 100 cases took between one and two years to close, and three cases took between two and 2.5 years to close.

 

2. Effect on Expatriates. One area of disagreement between the IRS and a taxpayer is as to whether a tax return was ever filed for a particular year.  Any taxpayer facing this problem is confronted with a Herculean task to prove he filed the “missing” return.  This is a serious problem for any taxpayer but it can be particularly harrowing if the taxpayer is an American living and working overseas.  Often times, a taxpayer living Stateside can prove the IRS lost a federal tax return by showing his State tax return that was filed. Many US States have a tax system that mirrors the federal system and may even require the taxpayer to attach a copy of the federal tax return to their State return.  On the contrary, a US taxpayer living and working abroad typically has no need to file any State tax returns since he will have broken residency with the State.
  • Most Americans working abroad know they may be eligible to exclude certain foreign earned income (wages, compensation for services) and housing amounts from US taxable income.  This means that, unlike their counterparts working in the USA, they won’t be taxed on some or all of the amounts paid by their employer when they are living and working in a foreign country. These exclusions are permitted under the rules governing the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) and  Foreign Housing Exclusion (FHE) of Section 911 of the Internal Revenue Code.  A tax return must be filed within certain time limits in order to claim these exclusion benefits by filing an election to take them.
  • What happens if a taxpayer moves abroad and has filed tax returns making the election, but the IRS later asserts that a tax return was never filed for the year(s) in question? Under the relevant tax rules, claiming the exclusions is permitted for any tax year, no matter how far back and no matter when the delinquent returns are filed so long as the IRS has not taken the first step and notified the taxpayer of their failure to make the election and that tax is owed.  On the other hand, if the IRS contacts the taxpayer first, the benefits can be denied; this can happen if the taxpayer owes any amount of federal income tax. If the taxpayer fails to keep a copy of the return and proof of filing it with the IRS, he may be out of luck.  This is particularly troublesome if the “missing” tax return is an earlier tax return claiming the FEIE/FHE election, since once the election is made it carries over to all subsequent tax years if not revoked by the taxpayer. In any event, counting on the IRS to have a copy of the tax return is foolhardy, especially in light of the recent TIGTA Report. 

3. Gifts or Bequest from A Former American?  Can You Prove Five Years of Tax Compliance? The IRS’ lack of good record-keeping should be of great concern to Americans receiving gifts or inheritances from former US citizens or green card holders since these individuals may be called upon to prove that the former American from whom they received the gift or bequest was, among other things, fully tax compliant for the five year period prior to relinquishing US status (i.e., he must prove the individual was not a so-called “covered expatriate”).  Internal Revenue Code Section 2801 imposes a tax on US recipients of certain gifts and bequests received from “covered expatriates”. 

 Such “covered” gifts or bequests may be taxable to the US recipient of that gift or bequest at the highest gift or estate tax rate in effect at the time of receipt. Currently, the highest Gift and Estate Tax rate is 40%. Under recently proposed IRS Regulations implementing Section 2801, the compliance burden is firmly placed on the US recipient of a gift or bequest from a foreign person to determine if the Code Section 2801 tax might apply to the recipient. 

When the US recipient is tasked with determining whether the person from whom he received the gift or bequest was a “covered expatriate”, he or she really needs proof about the status of that foreign person and such proof may entail the necessity to have the former American’s tax returns to hand.  One can imagine that obtaining this proof may be difficult, if not impossible – especially if the gift or bequest is received many years after the expatriation has taken place.  You cannot count on the IRS to have maintained the former American’s tax records!

TIGTA Recommendations

TIGTA made five recommendations related to improving the IRS’ policies for record retention and responding to external requests for records, including recommendations that IRS implement an enterprise e-mail solution  enabling it to comply with Federal records management requirements, and agency-wide dissemination of its newly issued policy on the collection and preservation of Federal records associated with separated employees. Not surprisingly, IRS management agreed with all five of TIGTA’s recommendations.

Will things really improve?  Let’s wait and see, but I am not holding my breath.
 
Have an IRS Tax Problem?
 

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

 
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243). 
 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

New Amendments to Swiss-US Tax Treaty Enter Into Force on Sept. 20

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help