GAO Advises Congress of Tax Abuses Associated With Offshore Insurance Products

A U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) team is telling Congress that taxpayers can abuse private placement variable life insurance.

The GAO team looked at the product for Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. The team focused on two types of offshore insurance: 

• Micro-Captive Insurers controlled by U.S. businesses, and 
• Private Placement Variable Life Insurance.

Jessica Lucas-Judy, a GAO director, wrote in a report on the GAO team’s findings that there are many legitimate uses for offshore life insurance products. Lucas-Judy wrote in the report: 

“Offshore Variable Life Insurance Products Have Been Used To Conceal Assets From The U.S. Government, Including Undeclared Assets At Risk Of Being Discovered During Investigations Of Foreign Banks.” 

“Further, some taxpayers closely control how their premiums are invested and may direct premium funds toward illiquid assets they currently own in an attempt to convert taxable income to tax-exempt income that is eventually passed on to their beneficiaries tax-free.”

The IRS has been clashing with taxpayers and their tax advisors over offshore insurance arrangements for years. The GAO prepared the report partly to  summarize the history of IRS efforts to police offshore insurance arrangements.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed in May to take up an offshore captive insurance case, CIC Services v. IRS. The case hinges on a question about rules governing legal challenges to regulatory mandates that are not taxes, rather than on insurance tax rules. 

In 2019, Lucas-Judy wrote, prosecutors won a criminal case involving a taxpayer who failed to file reports on a foreign financial account associated with a Swiss private placement variable life insurance policy.

In another case, a Tax Court judge determined “that the taxpayer had significant control over the assets held in the foreign financial account associated with his offshore private placement variable life insurance policies,” according to Lucas-Judy. “As a result, the court held that the taxpayer was the owner of that account for federal income tax purposes, and any income from the assets was includable in the taxpayer’s gross income.”

That taxpayer, an investment manager and the offshore insurer exchanged more than 70,000 emails about the variable life policies’ investment accounts, and the taxpayer directed the assets toward startups and other companies in which he had a financial interest, according to Lucas-Judy.

Have IRS Tax Problem?

 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

Read more at: Tax Times blog