Two Cayman residents are challenging a decision by the Tax Information Authority to comply with a tax information exchange request by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
Their application to file for judicial review claims that the Tax Information Authority was required to notify anyone whose rights would be affected by its decision to comply with the IRS request for information and that the failure to do so had infringed the applicants’ rights to privacy and a fair trial.
On July 22, the Tax information Authority served Cayman companies Tropical Trader Co II Ltd., Sir Turtle Building Co Ltd. and We Five Ltd. with a production notice. The notice did not provide any information about the nature and origin of the underlying tax information exchange request, but it identified the Aronfelds, who are shareholders of the companies, the court application states.
The request sought the production of “all company records including but not limited to all transactions pertaining to [the Aronfelds],” including financial records, account information and other contracts.
The lawsuit claims that the Aronfelds should have been notified and given an opportunity to be heard under the TIA Law “as a matter of fairness.”
The court application claims that recent amendments to the law in 2014 have created a new category of case where a criminal investigation is under way but proceedings have not commenced. In these circumstances, the tax authority is not required to apply to the court or to notify the individuals who are subject to the request.
“In eliminating any requirement for notice or judicial oversight in cases of criminal investigations the Section 8(4) Amendments and Section 17 Amendments were unconstitutional as contravening the rights of the Applicants and/or the [the companies that were served with the production notice] under Articles 7 and 9 of the Bill of Rights,” the application states.
The lawyers for the applicants said the production notices were unlawful, and they have asked Cayman’s tax authority for a copy of the tax information exchange request.
The application for leave to file for judicial review is the latest legal test of Cayman’s tax information exchange framework.
In a judgment released in July following a hearing in April, the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier Cayman Islands Grand Court ruling that the Tax Information Authority had not followed all of its legal obligations before releasing the information to its Australian counterparts, following an application under the relevant Tax Information Exchange Agreement.
In the initial 2013 judgment, Justice Charles Quin ruled that the Cayman Tax Authority had, among other things, failed to notify the parties subject to the information request and thereby infringed their rights to privacy and a fair and public hearing under the Cayman Islands Bill of Rights.
Read more at: Tax Times blog