Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2012

Tax amnesty offered to Americans in Canada

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service said it will waive potentially massive penalties for certain “low compliance risk” tax payers who opt to come clean.

Shulman announced the IRS will provide a new option to help some U.S. citizens and others residing abroad who haven’t been filing tax returns and provide them a chance to catch up with their tax filing obligations if they owe little or no back taxes. The newprocedure will go into effect on Sept. 1, 2012.

To qualify, individuals must submit three years of back taxes, six years of bank reporting forms – so-called Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, or FBARs – and a signed letter explaining why they haven’t filed.

The IRS defines low risk as people who have “simple” returns and owe less than $1,500 a year in taxes, based on the past three tax years. To owe less than $1,500 in US Tax, assuming a Single Filing Status and 1 Personal Exemption, your combined income would have to be less than $22,650.

Estimated Tax Analysis
Gross income $22,650
Qualified plan contributions - $0
Adjusted gross income = $22,650
Standard/Itemized deductions - $5,950
Personal exemptions - $3,800
Taxable income = $12,900
Tax liability before credits $1,500
Child tax credits - $0
Estimated tax liability = $1,500

This really only helps americans who retire in Canada and Canadians who pay Canadian Taxes on their World Wide Income and who use a US "Foreign Tax Credit" to reduce their US Tax to $1500.
Example: A US Citizen can earn interest of between 1% – 3%, on principle of between $755,000 – $2,265,000 and still qualify for this US amnesty (see chart below); even where this income may not have be subject to Canadian taxation.

Rate of Interest Principle Income
0.01 $2,265,000 $22,650
0.015 $1,510,000 $22,650
0.02 $1,132,500 $22,650
0.025 $906,000 $22,650
0.03 $755,000 $22,650

The United States is unique among developed countries in requiring all citizens, including dual Canadian-Americans, to file taxes with the IRS every year, regardless of where they live.

There are roughly a million Americans in Canada – many with little or no ties to the United States. An increasingly onerous U.S. crackdown on Americans who hide money offshore is forcing many of them out of the shadows.

Canadian Tax experts said the measures go a long way to resolving an issue that has caused a wave of angst among Americans in Canada and a flood of business for lawyers and accountants.

It’s a good start and it’s particularly good for about 90 per cent of Americans in Canada, most of whom will fall into the low risk category.

But individuals who don’t owe much tax, but have closely held partnerships, investment companies or trusts aren’t likely to benefit.

The IRS initially promised details of the amnesty late last year. But U.S. officials have struggled internally over whether people who haven’t filed for years deserve any special leniency.

The IRS also announced special “streamlined” procedures for reporting certain foreign retirement accountant, mentioning specifically Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Accounts. Individuals will be allowed to retroactively elect to defer income in those accounts.

Without the amnesty, Americans who haven’t filed their taxes and other IRS forms face penalties totalling tens of thousands of dollars per year and risk criminal prosecution. See IR-2012-64 for more details.

If you would like to avail yourself of this new Amnesty, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).


Read more at: Tax Times blog

Fiduciaries Held Liable For Estate & Gift Tax under Federal Priority Statute

Fiduciaries (trustees, executors, personal representatives) normally are not personally liable for the obligations of the trusts and estates they administer. As mentioned here previously, a major exception to this is the federal priority statute (a/k/a the federal claims statute) under 31 USC §3713(b)/Code § 6901(a)(1)(B). This little gem can create personal liability for a fiduciary that pays out estate or trust assets (including by reason of a distribution to beneficiaries) with knowledge that there are existing federal liabilities (such as taxes) that are unpaid, if the estate or trust is unable to later satisfy those liabilities.
This is not an abstract risk, but a very real liability for fiduciaries, as two fiduciaries learned in a recent case in Texas. In that case, the IRS asserted that a decedent did not pay gift taxes during lifetime, attributable to gifts indirectly made to the decedent. That is, the original donor did not pay the gift taxes on gifts to the decedent, so the decedent was liable for the gift taxes as a transferee. Both the executor of the decedent’s estate, and the trustee of his revocable trust, were knowledgeable of the IRS’ claim but nonetheless paid out funds without making provision for the payment of the gift taxes.
The case is illustrative of various aspects of the statute.
A. The executor was liable for personal property that was distributed to beneficiaries.
B. The executor was liable for rent payments made by the estate. Such payments are subordinate in priority to the federal claim for taxes.
C. The executor was NOT liable for funeral and last illness expenses.
D. The trustee of a revocable trust got caught up in the statute because the trustee was deemed to be the equivalent of a representative of the estate due to the obligation of the trust to pay the decedents debts.
E. The fiduciaries had taken income tax charitable deductions for over $1.1 million that had been set aside to fund charitable bequests. Such bequests were subordinate to the federal claim, so the fiduciaries were held personally liable for those set-aside amounts because the court found that the funds were beyond the reach of the IRS.
F. The fiduciaries were liable for legal and other expenses they paid for the charities.
G. The fiduciaries do not have to receive formal notice or a claim from the IRS, to be on notice for purpose of the statute.
H. The fact that the fiduciaries did not believe the IRS’ claim was valid, or that they relied on their professionals, did not relieve them of liability.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Inter-agency cooperation against tax crimes and other financial crimes is the future.

A report by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has concluded that International co-operation is essential in the fight against tax and other financial crimes.

This report which, was release on June 14, 2012, aims at improving the understanding and use of international co-operation mechanisms. After describing the different agencies involved in the fight against financial crimes, the report provides an overview of the international instruments available and summarises current initiatives to improve inter-agency co-operation.

The core of the report is a catalogue describing the basic features of the main instruments for international co-operation in combating financial crimes.

If you have an International Tax Problem, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Targets Israeli Banks and Their US Client

On June 14, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment against three American tax preparers for helping clients avoid taxes by moving money to Israel.
The transgressions detailed in the indictment were relatively small. The indictment said the father and son David and Nadav Kalai and their colleague David Almog at a firm called United Revenue Service helped several clients duck taxes by moving money to two Israeli banks, identified only as “Bank A” and “Bank B.”

The indictment revealed the existence of a grand jury that is almost surely going after much bigger fish. And the details provided in it appear to suggest that “Bank A” is Bank Leumi, whose private banking operation is headquartered in Tel Aviv, and“Bank B” is Bank Hapoalim, which also maintains its global private banking center in Israel’s second-biggest city.”

Because tax evasion is a felony in Israel and because the US has a treaty with Israel; this offense is an extraditable offense in Israel. Now will Israel refuse to hand over a dual citizen? The state of Israel was certainly not created to protect Jews from crimes of international tax evasion. More importantly, the US is Israel’s only real ally in the world. So do not be surprized if Israel hands over those dual citizens that the Department of Justice (DOJ) suspects of tax evasion.

If you have an undisclosed account in Israel, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A. for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Remember, the FBAR Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Process (OVDI)program is most likely available — Even if your bank, even if your personal banker is under investigation, the program is still available as long as YOU are not personally under audit or investigation by the IRS.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help