Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Yearly Archives: 2016

Numerous US Taxpayers Are Receiving Automated $10,000 Penalty Assessments For Late Filed Form 5472's – We Can Help!

We have been receiving a lot of calls from businesses who have recently received penalty notices regarding late filed or non-filed Form 5472's. 

The reason that US taxpayers are currently receiving these automatic assessments is that the IRS updated its IRM 20.1.9, Penalty Handbook, International Penalties on March 21, 2013 to now include and Automatic Assessment of this $10,000 Penalty for Form 5472, Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business.

The Form 5472, Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business (Under Sections 6038A and 6038C of the Internal Revenue Code), is filed as an attachment to the U.S. income tax return by the due date of that return, including extensions. If the reporting corporation’s income tax return is not timely filed, Form 5472 nonetheless must be timely filed at the campus where the return is due. When the income tax return is ultimately filed, a copy of Form 5472 must be attached.

The IRM 20.1.9, Penalty Handbook, International Penalties also provides:

  1. Pattern Letter for Failure to File Form 5472 ( Form Letter) See Exhibit 20.1.9-8     
  2. Penalty Assertion   (20.1.9.5.3) (03-21-2013) An initial penalty is asserted on Form 8278 using PRN 625 when the examiner determines that a U.S. corporation that is 25 percent foreign-owned during a taxable year has had transaction(s) with a related party and:   
    • Has failed to timely file Form 5472,
    • Has filed a Form 5472 which is inaccurate or incomplete, or
    • Has failed to maintain records of transactions with related parties.
  3. Penalty Computation (20.1.9.5.4) (03-21-2013) Initial Penalty—The initial penalty is $10,000 for each failure during a taxable year of a reporting corporation to:                    
    • Timely file a separate Form 5472 with respect to each related party with which it had a reportable transaction during such taxable year,
    • Maintain the required records relating to a reportable transaction, or
    • In the case of records maintained outside the U.S., meet the non-U.S. record maintenance requirements.
  4. Continuation Penalty—If any failure continues more than 90 days after the day on which the notice of such failure was mailed to the taxpayer (90-day period), additional penalties will apply. The continuation penalty is $10,000 for each 30-day period (or fraction thereof) during which such failure continues after the expiration of the 90-day period. These additional penalties are also asserted on Form 8278 using PRN 701 (prior to January 2013, PRN 619 was used for this continuation penalty).       

Reasonable Cause     

Our Experienced Tax Attorneys at M&A have extensive experience with obtaining waivers of penalty based upon "Reasonable Cause" and have been able to get such automatic assessments of the $10,000 Penalty for Form 5471's, waived after their assessment; either by the issuing IRS Service Center or at Appeals!
 
Other Defenses
 
Depending on the facts in your case, there are other defenses, both legal and factual, which also will result in the taxpayer obtaining a waiver of this $10,000 form 5472 late filing penalty.
 
Has  Your Company  Been Assessed an
Automatic $10,000 Penalty for a Late Form 5472?
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)
 
 
 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

2015 Tax Filings Are Due on April 18, 2016 or April 18, 2016, not April 15th!

As originally announced by IRS in May 2015, in Rev Rul 2015-13, 2015-22 IRB, the due date for returns for which the due date would otherwise be April 15, 2016 will instead be April 18, 2016 or April 19, 2016 for residents of Maine and Massachusetts.

Based on the reasoning in an example in Rev Rul 2015-13 and on the instructions to 2016 Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals, the due date for the first 2016 estimate for individual taxpayers will be Monday, April 18, 2016, regardless of your state of residence.

 Have a Tax Problem?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at 
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

President Obama and Treasury Update Their Plan for Business & International Tax Reform

The Administration and Treasury Department released a joint report titled “The President's Framework for Business Tax Reform: An Update,” which is an updated version of their 2012 proposal. In addition to providing the President's vision for tax reform, the report includes recent figures to demonstrate the urgent need for such reform, including statutory vs. effective tax rates, effective rates broken down by industry, and global corporate tax rate trends.

This updated report emphasizes that “...the urgency of closing loopholes and reforming the tax system more broadly has grown” significantly since 2012, pointing to:
  • the increased number of corporate inversions occurring over the past couple years
  • the global problem of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), currently being tackled by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

The report states that “[i]n the face of these challenges, inaction is not an option.”

Statutory vs. Effective Tax Rates. The U.S. has the highest statutory corporate tax rate among G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom (U.K.), and U.S.) at 39%, with the average among the other six countries being 29.6%.
However, the report cautions that effective tax rates don't “give a complete picture of how the tax code affects decision making and the competitiveness of the U.S. economy and U.S. firms in world markets.”
The effective marginal tax rate in the U.S. is 18.1%, which is significantly closer to the 19.4% average marginal tax rate among the other six G-7 countries. The difference between the statutory and effective rates in the U.S. suggests that corporate tax reform should lower the statutory rate while broadening the base to maintain the same level of revenue. Eliminating loopholes and subsidies would “level the effective marginal tax rates,” and encourage decisions to be made for business and investment reasons instead of tax. 

Distortions in Location of Production & Allocation of Products.Under the current rules, U.S. companies can reduce their tax by shifting their reported profits to lower-tax jurisdictions and/or engaging in corporate inversions (i.e., changing their tax residence to a low-tax country by merging with a foreign corporation). This causes economic distortions both from encouraging firms to invest and grow business activities abroad and by causing firms to spend their money on tax planning instead of productive investment. 

The President's framework for business tax reform is intended to reduce tax distortions, including those discussed above, and to address problems with the current international tax system. include:
  • Reduce the top corporate tax rate from 35% to 28%.
  • Eliminate the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT).
  • Revise current depreciation schedules that generally overstate the true economic depreciation of assets. (The report notes that many other large countries have scaled back depreciation allowances as a way of paying for rate-lowering corporate tax reform.)
  • Limit the deductibility of interest.
  • Cut the top corporate tax rate on manufacturing income to 25% and to an even lower rate for income from advanced manufacturing activities. This would be accomplished by reforming the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction to: focus more on manufacturing activity; increase the credit to 10.7%; and increase it even more for advanced manufacturing.
  • Eliminate tax breaks for specific industries “with the few exceptions that are critical to broader growth or address certain externalities.” Specifically, the President's framework would: eliminate last-in, first out (LIFO) accounting; eliminate tax breaks for the oil and gas industry; reform the treatment of the insurance industry and products; and reform the measurement and character of gains, including modifications to the rules for like-kind exchanges.
  • Provide reforms specific to the financial sector, including imposition of a financial fee (i.e., a tax on large financial institutions based on the amount of their liabilities), increase certain transaction fees, close the “carried interest” loophole, and modernize the taxation of certain financial products to prevent tax arbitrage.
  • Promote innovation by expanding and simplifying the now-permanent research credit.
  • Consolidate, enhance, and permanently extend key tax incentives to encourage investment in clean energy while repealing fossil fuel subsidies.
  • Effectively cut the top corporate tax rate on manufacturing income to 25% by reforming the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction and increasing the credit to 10.7%.
  • Establish a new per-country minimum tax (19%, less a foreign tax credit equal to 85% of the per-country average foreign effective tax rate) on foreign earnings that would reduce firms' ability to avoid U.S. tax by shifting profits overseas, reduce the incentive to shift production overseas, and increase the global competitiveness of U.S. corporations.
  • Impose a one-time 14% tax on unrepatriated earnings, which could then be repatriated without any further U.S. tax.
  • Limit U.S. interest expense deductions to curb “earnings stripping.”
  • Limit inversions by preventing firms from acquiring smaller foreign firms and changing the tax residence as a result, and from changing their tax residence to any country where they do not have substantial economic activities if their operations in the U.S. are more valuable than their operations in the other country and they continue to be managed and controlled in the U.S.
  • Close loopholes and stop strategies that facilitate BEPS, including tightening rules governing cross-border transfers of intangible property, closing loopholes by expanding the scope of the existing Subpart F rules, and restricting the use of “hybrid” arrangements that take advantages of differences in tax rules. The report notes that these reforms are consistent with the cooperative efforts being made by the OECD's BEPS project, which were endorsed by President Obama and other world leaders at the 2015 G-20 Summit.
  • Allow small businesses to expense up to $1 million in investments.
  • Allow cash accounting for businesses with up to $25 million in gross receipts.
  • Simplify additional accounting rules for small business and harmonize eligibility.
  • Quadruple the deduction for start-up costs (from $5,000 to $20,000).
  • Reform and expand the health insurance tax credit for small businesses.

For more detail go to “The President's Framework for Business Tax Reform: An Update.

Want to Know How To Benefit From
This Tax Reform Proposal?  
 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).


 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Huge Leak From the Panamanian Law Firm Mossack Fonseca!

According to Forbes, the offshore planning world was set on fire this weekend with the news that 11 million documents were leaked from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. According to a BBC article found.

They show how Mossack Fonseca has helped clients launder money, dodge sanctions and evade tax. The company says it has operated beyond reproach for 40 years and has never been charged with criminal wrong-doing.

The documents show links to 72 current or former heads of state in the data, including dictators accused of looting their own countries.

Gerard Ryle, director of the ICIJ, said the documents covered the day-to-day business at Mossack Fonseca over the past 40 years.

While the neither the BBC article, nor a more detailed series of articles from the International Consortium of International Journalists, reference any U.S. client;, U.S. persons will probably show up, given that Mossack Fonseca apparently maintained a branch in Las Vegas, Nevada, under the name of M.F. Company Services and Mossack Fonseca Company Services is currently attempting to fight a subpoena brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada seeking information on at least 123 companies that it created.

Do You Have Undeclared Income 
From A Foreign Company
Formed By Mossack Fonseca ?
 

 
 
 Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You?

 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini& Associates, P.A.  
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

 

 

 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help