Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Monthly Archives: February 2021

DC Ruled That IRS Could Assess Only A 5% Penalty for an Untimely Filing of Form 3520.

The federal district court struck down the IRS's imposition of a 35% civil penalty for failing to timely file a Form 3520, an information return used to report, among other things, transactions with foreign trusts, and limited the penalty to a 5% penalty.

The court ruled that the penalty must be computed based upon the year-end value of the trust's bank account, which meant that the penalty amount was zero and not $3,221,183, as the IRS asserted. The ruling is a clear taxpayer victory and provides much needed guidance by a federal district court on the application of the civil penalties for unfiled Forms 3520 for foreign trusts.

In Wilson, No. 19-cv-5037 (BMC) (E.D.N.Y. 11/18/19), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that the IRS could assess only a 5% penalty (not both a 5% penalty and a 35% penalty) for an individual's untimely filing of a 2007 Form 3520. Wilson illustrates that practitioners should carefully review IRS penalty computations and not merely take them for granted.

Information return penalty cases, and particularly unfiled Form 3520 cases, are relatively new to IRS field agents, even the most seasoned IRS agents, and there are only a handful of reported cases that agents can look to for guidance. An agent working an offshore trust case may not fully understand the workings of two complex Code sections, Secs. 6677 and 6048, that must be read in conjunction to determine the penalties accurately. When faced with a technically challenging issue, an agent should reach out for technical assistance to, for example, IRS Counsel, for field advice, but this does not always occur. The agent may, in good faith, believe that he or she got it right, assess the penalty, and close the case.

A reasonable cause exception exists for unfiled information returns, such as Form 3520 or even a Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, and this may be a valid defense in most situations. Under Sec. 6677(d), no penalty is imposed "on any failure which is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect."

However, as taxpayers face more and more steep information return penalties, it is prudent to do more than assert that reasonable cause exists for the untimely filed form to mount a strong defense. Practitioners must understand how the IRS computed the penalty, and as in the Wilson case, determine whether the IRS got it right. This could be a golden nugget in the hands of a taxpayer that significantly reduces the penalty amount and provides needed financial relief.

Civil penalties for late-filed Forms 3520 is an evolving area of the law and taxpayers should be prepared that the agent assigned to the case may not be thoroughly familiar with the intricacies of the Code, especially since there are few published cases. The tax professional should be ready to answer the agent's questions on the law and the facts (particularly, the mechanics of the foreign trust). The IRS's mission is to apply the tax law with integrity and fairness to all. In complex cases, the best results are often reached when both sides work together collaboratively.  

A taxpayer who has received an IRS Notice CP 15 for an unfiled Form 3520 involving a foreign trust would be wise to contact a competent tax counsel, who can review the facts of the case, explain the options, and formulate a defensible position.

We Recently Successfully Represented A Taxpayer
In Having Abated $325,178.70 in Late Filed 
Form 3520–A Penalty, On March 30, 2020.

 

The key to successfully having these penalties abated, 
more so today than ever before
, is to hire an 
Experienced Tax Attorney, to develop the facts and distinguish adverse case law, especially when requesting penalty abatement based upon "Reasonable Cause".

Penalties for Late Filing or Failure to File Form 3520

IRC section 6677 provides for stiff penalties if Form 3520 is not timely filed or is incomplete or incorrect. The initial penalty is the greater of $10,000 or—

  • 35% of the gross value of any property transferred to a foreign trust if a U.S. person fails to report the creation of or transfer to a foreign trust;
  • 35% of the gross value of the distributions received from a foreign trust by a U.S. person who fails to report receipt of the distribution; and
  • 5% of the gross value of all of a foreign trust’s assets treated as owned by a U.S. person under the grantor trust rules (IRC sections 671–679) if the U.S. owner fails to report required information. The owner is also subject to an additional 5% penalty if the foreign trust itself fails to file a timely Form 3520-A [“Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner”; see IRC section 6048(b)], does not provide all required information, or provides incorrect information. 

Penalties for Late Filing or Failure to File Form 3520-A

The U.S. owner is subject to an initial penalty equal to the greater of $10,000 or 5% of the gross value of the portion of the trust's assets treated as owned by the U.S. person at the close of that tax year if the foreign trust (a) fails to file a timely Form 3520-A, or (b) does not furnish all of the information required by section 6048(b) or includes incorrect information. Criminal penalties may be imposed under sections 7203, 7206, and 7207 for failure to file on time and for filing a false or fraudulent return. 

Have You Been Assessed a Semi-Automatic Penalty 
for a Late Form  3520 or 3520-A?
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)
 





Sources:

Wilson, No. 19-cv-5037 (BMC) (E.D.N.Y. 11/18/19)

Steven L. Walker

Read more at: Tax Times blog

IRS Audit Rates Increase as Income Rises

man touching cybersecurity features

Few Things Can Generate As Much Taxpayer Concern, Confusion And Controversy As An IRS Audit.


Tax audits are a critical compliance tool to help ensure fairness in the tax system, and the IRS works hard to ensure the agency's audit selection process is fair and impartial. Decisions to conduct audits are based on the financial information that's on – or not on – the tax return. There's an extensive set of checks and balances to ensure fairness with individual audits, and there are important protections and appeals for taxpayers during the administrative process as well.

But before an audit of a taxpayer takes place, the IRS career leadership team must make higher-level decisions on where to focus our limited audit resources across the agency. Given the breadth of our economy and the types of income people have, the IRS takes steps to ensure audits are spread across income categories – to ensure fairness and support voluntary compliance with the nation's tax laws.

Like many things involving taxes, there are complexities behind audit rates. On the surface, these can be easy to misinterpret. A Closer Look at audit rates provides insight into which income groups are more likely to be audited.

Higher - Income Taxpayers Face Greater Chance of Audit

Despite common misperceptions about IRS examination rates, the reality is that the likelihood of an audit significantly increases as income grows.

Taxpayers with incomes of $10 million and above had substantially higher audit rates than taxpayers in every other income category for each calendar year from 2010 through 2015. Those with incomes above $1 million also had higher exam rates than all other groups earning less.

Tax Year 2015 provides a good historical overview of where IRS compliance priorities are focused. The exam coverage rate of taxpayers with incomes of $10 million or more is 8.16%. The rate for those between $1 million and $10 million is 2.53%. And other income categories are far below that – generally less than 1%.

Tax Year 2015 is the last year for which we know the actual audit rates, because the IRS can still open audits for more recent years, so the data for more recent years is not yet complete.

The IRS normally has three years to assess tax from when a return was filed. For example, the IRS would normally have until at least October 15, 2021 to assess additional tax on a tax return filed October 15, 2018, for the 2017 tax year.

Higher-income tax returns are more complex, and they can take much more time to complete – frequently several years after the tax return is filed. Therefore, to get the complete picture of the audit rate for a specific tax year, audits in process as well as completed audits must be included.

On the other hand, audits of low- and moderate-income tax returns take less time to resolve. Each year, approximately 25 million lower-income taxpayers seek a refundable EITC which on their return involves a single issue that can be quickly resolved, sometimes within a month or so of filing the return. The IRS prioritizes a prompt review of these returns in order to quickly issue the EITC refund to people in need, most frequently within 21 days following the filing of the return, without any further audit of such returns. The average time to complete an EITC audit is five hours per return.

The IRS averages approximately 300,000 EITC audits per year out of the universe of 25 million. The total universe of tax year 2015 returns in income categories of $1 to $5 million, $5 million to $10 million and $10 million and over was 478,772. It is important to look at the percentage of filers audited in each income category rather than merely the number of audits in each income category.

The chart below shows that higher-income taxpayers were audited at much higher rates in 2013-2015. Data is not yet complete for the more recent years, particularly for high-income taxpayers for the 2016 through 2018 tax years, where many examinations are in the process or have yet to even begin.

IRS Audit Rates by Income Category: 2013-2015
Shows More Exams For Higher Income Over Time

Total positive income Total returns filed in TY2013 Returns examined* Percent covered
No total positive income** 619,694 78,573 12.68
$1 under $25,000 56,181,555     464,856    0.83   
$25,000 under $50,000 34,753,396 121,841    0.35   
$50,000 under $75,000 19,532,032 63,700    0.33   
$75,000 under $100,000 12,787,903 52,852    0.41   
$100,000 under $200,000 17,451,788 90,236    0.52   
$200,000 under $500,000 4,844,782 40,290    0.83   
$500,000 under $1,000,000 800,121 11,802    1.48   
$1,000,000 under $5,000,000 342,605 10,782    3.15   
$5,000,000 under $10,000,000 23,413 1,499    6.40   
$10,000,000 and above 14,009 1,689 12.06
Total positive income Total returns filed in TY2014 Returns examined* Percent covered
No total positive income** 662,876    49,829    7.52   
$1 under $25,000 54,956,300    390,799    0.71   
$25,000 under $50,000 35,090,262    147,805    0.42   
$50,000 under $75,000 19,676,659    82,822    0.42   
$75,000 under $100,000 13,130,657    49,717    0.38   
$100,000 under $200,000 18,405,264    73,729    0.40   
$200,000 under $500,000 5,324,980    29,884    0.56   
$500,000 under $1,000,000 910,977    10,362    1.14   
$1,000,000 under $5,000,000 401,634    10,651    2.65   
$5,000,000 under $10,000,000 28,847    1,512    5.24   
$10,000,000 and above 18,122    1,572    8.67   
Total positive income Total returns filed in TY2015 Returns examined* Percent covered
No total positive income** 701,594    31,329    4.47   
$1 under $25,000 54,135,898    357,410    0.66   
$25,000 under $50,000 35,589,401    141,727    0.40   
$50,000 under $75,000 20,312,858    108,219    0.53   
$75,000 under $100,000 13,063,770    64,324    0.49   
$100,000 under $200,000 19,459,846    92,124    0.47   
$200,000 under $500,000 5,788,644    31,804    0.55   
$500,000 under $1,000,000 962,481    10,898    1.13   
$1,000,000 under $5,000,000 428,082    10,244    2.39   
$5,000,000 under $10,000,000 31,159    1,367    4.39   
$10,000,000 and above 19,531    1,593    8.16   

Source: Table 17a, Internal Revenue Data Book, 2019
*Returns examined is total of columns “Closed” and “in process”.
** Returns that show no total positive income report zero or negative income. The negative income could be negative business income and/or capital losses. Returns with no TPI are filed by taxpayers in any of the income categories, and there is no prevalence of one over the other. These returns account for less than 0.5% of the individual filing population.


The typical audits for higher-income taxpayers involve at least three different tax years, often include related entities, and routinely take years to resolve. The highest income taxpayers face the most significant chance of an examination, and they face the most highly trained and experienced IRS agents and teams utilizing our most sophisticated tools and techniques.

At the end of the day, the IRS strives to properly serve compliant taxpayers and uphold the nation’s tax laws, ranging from civil side audits and notices to criminal investigations in the most egregious cases. We face tough choices each year as far as where to deploy resources given the breadth of our responsibilities, but our choices are guided by fair and impartial audit plans throughout the process.

Source: Comments from Deputy Commissioner Sunita Lough, October 20, 2020 


Have an IRS Tax Problem?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



Read more at: Tax Times blog

Former Florida Resident Indicted for Tax Evasion and Failing to Report Foreign Bank Accounts

According to the DoJ, a federal grand jury returned an indictment today charging Lucia Andrea Gatta, a former resident of Palm Beach County, Florida, with tax evasion and failing to file Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs), among other offenses, announced Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Stuart M. Goldberg of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida. 

According to the indictment, Gatta was born in Chile and became a naturalized U.S. Citizen in 2012. The indictment alleges that, for calendar years 2012 through 2014, Gatta failed to disclose her interest in a Swiss bank account on annual FBARs as required by law. Gatta also allegedly evaded assessment of income taxes on the interest and dividend income she earned in her Swiss bank account and failed to file tax returns with the IRS for tax years 2011 through 2014. 

The indictment also charges Gatta with naturalization fraud. According to the indictment, Gatta did not disclose to the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that she had failed to report foreign dividend and interest income during her citizenship application process, and she allegedly presented misleading documents to USCIS to substantiate the false statements she made during her naturalization interview. 

If convicted, Gatta faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison for each count relating to her failure to file an FBAR and tax evasion. She also faces a maximum sentence of one year in prison for each of the counts concerning the failure to file tax returns. 

If Convicted Of Naturalization Fraud,
Gatta Faces A Maximum Sentence Of Ten Years In Prison
And Automatic Denaturalization.

An indictment is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Do You Have Undeclared Offshore Income?

 
Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You? 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Argentina & US to Exchange Country-By-Country Reports Annually


The US and Argentina have said they will begin to exchange, on an annual basis, country-by-country reports (CbC Reports) that each country receives regarding multinational enterprise groups (MNE Groups). The countries intend to first exchange CbC reports that they received regarding MNE Group fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. According to the IRS, the reports will help the governments assess high-level transfer pricing risks and other base erosion and profit shifting risks.

Certain US persons that are the ultimate parent entity of an MNE Group must produce CbC Reports on an annual basis. The CbC Report is submitted to the IRS on Form 8975, Country-by-Country Report. (Reg §1.6038-4(a)) A US person that must produce a CbC Report is hereinafter referred to as a Reporting Entity.

CbC Reports are designed and established as part of an international effort to standardize transfer pricing documentation. This standardized documentation is intended to provide an efficient and effective means for tax administrations from different countries to conduct high-level transfer pricing risk assessment. (Preamble to TD 9773)

In an arrangement, that was signed and became operative on January 27, 2021, the US and Argentina say that the Competent Authority of each country intends to exchange with the other Competent Authority annually, on an automatic basis, the CbC Reports received from each Reporting Entity that is resident for tax purposes in that Competent Authority's jurisdiction.

The arrangement says that CbC Reports are first intended to be exchanged with respect to fiscal years of MNE Groups commencing on or after January 1, 2018.

Have an International or IRS Tax Problem?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


 


Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help