Fluent in English, Spanish & Italian | 888-882-9243

call us toll free: 888-8TAXAID

Category Archives: From Live Blog

Attorney Ronald A. Marini of Marini & Associates, P.A. has Achieved the AV Preeminent® Rating – the Highest Possible Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®.

Ronald A. Marini, a lawyer based in Miami, FL whose primary area of practice is International Tax Law & Tax Litigation Representation, has earned the AV Preeminent® rating from Martindale-Hubbell®

Miami, FL November 9, 2015 - Martindale-Hubbell® has confirmed that attorney Ronald A. Marini still maintains the AV Preeminent Rating, Martindale-Hubbell's highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability, even after first achieving this rating in 2003.

For more than 130 years, lawyers have relied on the Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent® rating while searching for their own expert attorneys. Now anyone can make use of this trusted rating by looking up a lawyer's rating on Lawyers.com or martindale.com. The Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent® rating is the highest possible rating for an attorney for both ethical standards and legal ability. This rating represents the pinnacle of professional excellence. It is achieved only after an attorney has been reviewed and recommended by their peers - members of the bar and the judiciary. Congratulations go to Ronald A. Marini who has achieved the AV Preeminent® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®

To find out more or to contact Ronald A. Marini of Miami, FL, call 305-374-4424, or visit http://www.taxlaw.ms.

 Have A Tax Problem?

 
  

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

for a FREE Tax Consultation

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888)882-9243.





 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

BVI – Proposed Changes to the Eligible Introducer Rules!

On October 15, 2015 the British Virgin Islands announced 2 changes to their compliance regime for BVI companies (see FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY NOTICE below :

1.  Eligible Introducers to Supply Beneficial Ownership Information for All Companies They Have Formed on Behalf of Their Clients.

  • Starting January 1, 2016, Eligible Introducers will need to provide to their registered agent information on the Beneficial Owner of any BVI companies formed on behalf of their clients.
  • The information required will include: Beneficial Owner’s name, date of birth, residential address and nationality.
  • BVI registered agents will have a transition period of 12 months from the implementation date to become compliant with these obligations.
  • The new information requirements for Eligible Introducers are scheduled to be introduced via amendments to the BVI’s existing Anti-Money Laundering legislation before the end of 2015.

2.  Establishment of a Private Register of Directors for all BVI Companies.
  • The BVI Business Companies Act will be amended to require the filing of registers of directors for all companies at a private registry.

One question we are all likely to receive is what happens if we do not provide the required information for existing companies by the end of the transitional period?

While we do not know exactly what penalties will be enforced; it is likely, that such companies may be liable for penalties and/or strike-off and whoever is your BVI corporate agent may also need to resign as registered agent, which would also ultimately lead to strike-off.

Do  You Have Concerns About Disclosing This 
Information About Your BVI Company?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.


 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at 
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY NOTICE

15th October, 2015

TO: Industry Association Heads

PROPOSED ENHANCEMENTS TO THE ELIGIBLE INTRODUCER REGIME

The Government of the British Virgin Islands (BVI) recognises the evolving international standards of transparency as promoted by The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), as well as the aims of the Government of the United Kingdom. As a result, the BVI Government has been in dialogue with the private sector to modify the Eligible Introducer Regime by requiring those registered agents relying on Eligible Introducer Letters to maintain certain prescribed beneficial ownership information.

The Government believes that it is important that the systems utilised to access beneficial ownership information must be effective, efficient and fit for purpose, at the same time acknowledging that across jurisdictions, systems aimed at achieving this end may not be identical. We believe that they should be similarly effective and efficient but focus should be on achieving equivalent outcomes and not necessarily on using identical pathways to the outcome.

It is on this basis that I advise you that after consultation with representatives from the industry, as of 1ST January 2016, beneficial ownership information of BVI companies will be required to be held within the BVI and that relevant information requested by Competent Authorities will be provided expeditiously by a more effective and efficient system.

Service providers in the BVI will be required to become compliant with these requirements for existing companies within twelve (12) months, with a possible extension in specific circumstances. The information required to be held will include company beneficial owners' names, dates of birth, residential addresses and nationalities.

In addition to the introduction of these enhancements to the AML/CFT requirements, the BVI Business Companies Act, amongst other things, will be amended to include a requirement for the private filing of registers of directors for all companies.

The Government will continue to monitor the evolution of global standards and best practices and sustain our engagement with industry to ensure that the BVI remains a pioneering, vibrant and competitive financial center for global business.

I would encourage you to circulate this notice widely to your members.

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Issues Concerning Filing a Form 706NA?


On September 23, 2015, we posted "Some Nonresidents with U.S. Assets Must File Estate Tax Returns" where we discussed that deceased nonresidents who were not American citizens are subject to U.S. estate taxation with respect to their U.S.-situated assets.

Many foreigners owning property or assets in the United States are in violation of 706-NA filing requirements because of a number of misunderstandings. The basic rule is pretty clear-if a foreign decedent has assets in the United States with a gross value in excess of $60,000, the estate is supposed to file a tax return with the Internal Revenue Service. 

Many people think of numerous reasons not to file. The main one relates to mortgages or liens against the US property. Assume that a property in Florida is worth $150,000 and there is a $100,000 mortgage held by Bank of X. The owner of the property dies. Is a 706-NA required? Yes-you are not permitted to net the mortgage against the fair market value of the property. The only way you can do this is if the person who owns the property is a German domiciliary in which case the value can be netted on the tax return. This is a peculiarity of the German- United States estate tax convention. Cyst The deceased German domiciliary must still file the tax return because the gross value of the property, the criteria for filing a tax return, is still met. 


Other people look to tax treaties to avoid filing the tax returns even when the assets exceed $60,000. What most people do not realize is that in order to take advantage of a tax treaty, one needs to file a federal estate tax return and include a form 8833 with the return explaining the application of the treaty to this particular estate. If you fail to file the 706-NA, you would still technically owe tax on any US situs asset with a gross value in excess of $60,000.

 

Let's make it very simple for everyone- if you represent a foreign client with assets in the United States  with a gross value exceeding $60,000, you are required to file a federal estate tax.

Without the filing of the tax return, you are unable to take advantage of deductions, credits, and treaties benefits which might aid you in reducing the gross federal tax to a point of zero. Additionally, I might add, your client's estate is not in compliance with federal estate tax laws if no 706-NA is filed

 Have a US Estate Tax Problem?
 

Estate Tax Problems Require
an Experienced Estate Tax Attorney

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Robert S. Blumenfeld  - 
 Estate Tax Counsel

Mr. Blumenfeld concentrates his practice in the areas of International Tax and Estate Planning, Probate Law, and Representation of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens before the IRS.

Prior to joining Marini & Associates, P.A., he spent 32 years as the Senior Attorney with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Deputy Commissioner, International.

While with the IRS, he examined approximately 2,000 Estate Tax Returns and litigated various international and tax issues associated with these returns.As a result of his experience, he has extensive knowledge of the issues associated with and the preparation of U.S. Estate Tax Returns for Resident and Non-Resident Aliens, Gift Tax Returns, Form 706QDT and Qualified Domestic Trusts.




 

 
 



 

Read more at: Tax Times blog

With Growing Number of Partnerships, IRS Has NOW Been Given the Power to Improve its Partnership Audit Efficiency!


The Government Accounting Office (GAO) released it's report GAO-14-732: on September 18, 2014 indicating that the IRS needs to improve its audit and efficiency of partnerships.

What GAO Found

The number of large partnerships has more than tripled to 10,099 from tax year 2002 to 2011. Almost two-thirds of large partnerships had more than 1,000 direct and indirect partners, had six or more tiers and/or self reported being in the finance and insurance sector, with many being investment funds.

Historically the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audited few large partnerships. Most audits resulted in no change to the partnership's return and the aggregate change was small. the study also found that the IRS audited just 0.8% of large partnerships, those with at least 100 partners and $100 million in assets, as compared to a 27.1% audit rate for corporations with at least $100 million in assets. Most of those partnership audits resulted in no additional taxes, and the GAO said it wasn’t sure whether that was because of high compliance or the agency’s inability to find noncompliance.

According to IRS auditors, the audit results may be due to challenges such as finding the sources of income within multiple tiers while meeting the administrative tasks required by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) within specified time frames.

For example, IRS auditors said that it can sometimes take months to identify the partner that represents the partnership in the audit, reducing time available to conduct the audit. TEFRA does not require large partnerships to identify this partner on tax returns.

Also under TEFRA, unless the partnership elects to be taxed at the entity level (which few do), IRS must pass audit adjustments through to the ultimate partners. IRS officials stated that the process of determining each partner's share of the adjustment is paper and labor intensive. When hundreds of partners' returns have to be adjusted, the costs involved limit the number of audits IRS can conduct. Adjusting the partnership return instead of the partners' returns would reduce these costs but, without legislative action, IRS's ability to do so is limited.

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) Audit Timeline

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) Audit Timeline

A 3-year statute of limitations governs the time IRS has to conduct partnership audits, which is about equally split between the time from when a return is received until the audit begins and the time to do the audit. IRS then has a year to assess the partners their portion of the audit adjustment. 

What GAO Recommended

Congress should consider requiring large partnerships to identify a partner to represent them during audits and to pay taxes on audit adjustments at the partnership level. IRS should take multiple actions, including: define large partnerships, track audit results using revised audit codes, and implement project planning principles for the audit procedure projects. IRS agreed with all the recommendations, but noted that revision of the audit codes is dependent upon future funding.

Now the Congress & the President Have Responded

The Internal Revenue Service will now have an easier time auditing large partnerships, including private-equity firms and hedge funds, under a recently passed legislation. Budget legislation (H.R. 1314) signed by President Barack Obama on November 2, 2015, simplifies the procedures for the IRS to audit and collect adjustments from complex partnerships.

Under the bill, the IRS would apply changes in audits to the partnership itself, not individual partners. Small partnerships with fewer than 100 partners could exempt themselves from the new regime, which would begin in 2018. This new auditnext hit program could however subject partners to pay tax for years they didn't have an ownership interest. Furthermore, it is expected to have the biggest impact on partnerships where there is high turnover, such as master limited partnerships and hedge funds.


The new previous hitauditnext hit process doesn't require the previous hitIRSnext hit to notify every partner about an previous hitauditnext hit. All communication will go through a point person selected by the partnership, which is similar to current IRS audits ofnext hit C corporations, where the actual shareholders are not notified the tax audit and the audit is handled by the officers of the C Corporation.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this measure and one other item, would raise $11.2 billion over the next decade.

The new audit program would be effective for previous hitpartnershipnext hit taxable years beginning in 2018, which allows advisers 2 years to review previous hitpartnershipnext hit agreements for their clients and possibly for their own firms, as many professional firms are structured as pass-through entities. previous hit

  

Is the IRS Auditing Your Partnership or Hedge Fund?

 


Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.


 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at 

or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Sources

GAO

The WallStreet Journal

Yahoo News

Read more at: Tax Times blog

Live Help